Why is the genetics of big cadres stronger than the genes of scientists?

The expressive traits of organisms are influenced by both genes and the external environment. In other words, the impact of the environment cannot be ignored, and the environmental impact in the process of human individual development is even more important.

First of all, in any social background, the biggest advantage of cadres over other professions has always been: the closest to material resources and information**! Therefore, this profession is the most in line with the human instinct of profit-seeking.

Science and scientists only emerged after the development of human society has reached a relatively advanced stage. Scientists themselves play a driving role rather than a leading role in social development and distribution. Therefore, the social and historical influence of scientists is still relatively low compared with that of cadres.

This is precisely why many people are more inclined to choose the social profession of cadre.

Secondly, let's talk about why it is easier for the children of cadres to become cadres. From the perspective of the cadres themselves, the development of their own children is more advantageous for the construction of their own network than the development of other subordinates. From the perspective of the children of cadres, because of the land, cultivation and shading of their parents, they have a greater advantage in the development of their careers than other similar individuals.

This is especially true in China, where the culture of human affection is strong! From the point of view of scientists and their children, these characteristics are absent or have little impact.

So it's not necessarily the genes that are at work, at least most of them aren't!!

The utility gene is stronger than the sullen type.

It is determined by the social soil and social genes.

It's because of their children's choices.

My daughter's words changed my life......

It is said that when my daughter was five years old, the day before Children's Day, my daughter ran home crying, hugged her father and said sadly, Dad, why do you want to marry your mother, why don't you marry such a beautiful mother as a neighbor's aunt. Just because my mother is obese, I am also genetically obese, I can't wear beautiful dresses, and the teacher doesn't let me perform on stage with the children, and I blame you. The husband couldn't cry when he heard it, so he could only comfort the child.

Although I was very angry when I heard it, but if I think about it carefully, the size of the rice, the weight of 150 pounds, is indeed too fat to speak, and then look at my daughter, the delicacy of the obesity heredity, and the cuteness of the whole fat huhu. I've never noticed my appearance before, and I don't think it's okay to be fat. After listening to my daughter's words, I decided to change and not let obesity become a stepping stone for my daughter's future.

I agreed with my daughter that whoever wins will be rewarded with a new dress. In the end, we both succeeded, and my daughter danced in a beautiful dress, and I was very relieved to see how excited my daughter was.

Although genetics are powerful, our power is limitless, and everything can be changed as long as we work hard.

The vector DNA of the gene is very rigorous in the process of replication, but it is inevitable that there will be mistakes, and in the environment of electromagnetism, radiation radiation, and mutagens, the probability of errors is much greater, which will cause changes in the DNA sequence, objectively speaking, the probability of errors in the replication of all DNA in the genome is the same, that is to say, all genes have the same mutation rate, but the selection of these genes by the environment is different, for example, If the two are mutated in two individuals, then people without hair have a much greater chance of surviving than people without eyes, in other words, the probability of inheriting the mutated non-long hair gene to the offspring is also greater than the mutated gene that does not grow eyes, and then we look at it the other way, in the offspring, the consistency of the gene that controls the eye is higher than the consistency of the gene that controls the hair, that is, it is better preserved.

Maybe I'm talking complicated, to put it simply, the greater the contribution to the viability of the offspring, the greater the selection pressure, if there is a change, most of the offspring will be absent, and the selection of the small gene, there will be more and more versions, or even the original version is gone, so the greater the contribution to the survival of the organism, the higher the probability of being retained in the evolutionary process.

The dominant gene is stronger than the recessive gene, but the genetic problem is very deep, and the atavistic phenomenon is possible. It's a pure coincidence, it's a character, and it's almost the same as a two-color ball lottery. But it is precisely because of this that human reproduction will be colorful and interesting.

You don't have to worry too much, there are genetic diseases in the general pregnancy fetal test.

In the process of inheritance, there is no strength or weakness between genes. Only in the natural environment, traits that cannot adapt to the environment will be eliminated, and genes control the expression of species traits, and the survival of the fittest.

All genes have an equal chance of being transmitted, and the so-called excellent gene only means that it is superior to other alleles, and whether it can be successfully passed on to future generations is not certain.

Survival of the fittest, survival of the fittest. Genes that are suitable for the environment will be passed down selectively over time.