Can two people be happy if they get married without a house

If you don't have a house, you can work together and make money together to buy it.

Being with him will make you happy and happy, and if you don't have it, let's go for it.

If you were given a millionaire and he didn't love you, and you didn't love him, would you be happy?

If it were me, I would have chosen to love my poor husband, and the two of us would fight together.

You already have your lover, so don't think about it.

I wish you all the best to have your own big house soon...

I wish you happiness...

Are you happy when you have a house? Now that housing prices are so expensive, buying is not a lifetime to pay off debts, why not buy a chic life. As long as the two of them are happy, make some plans before marriage, and then consider it when the housing price is right, anyway, according to their own ability, it is better to consider it without affecting the quality of life.

If he doesn't have a house, it means that you will have to live with his parents or rent a house after marriage.

If it is the former, you have to clearly judge whether you and his parents can get along, otherwise there will be a headache if there is a conflict.

In the case of the latter, the pressure of renting a life will be greater.

It is better for the two to work together than to take out a loan to buy a house, and what they work together to create is a happy life.

Like my troubles, but the truth is that poor couples mourn everything! There will definitely be contradictions, and it will be too late to regret it. It's better to break up and find a house to have, it's not so stressful.

Two people get married without feelings, and it is unclear whether they will be happy after marriage. Some people will live happily after marriage, and their personality and temper will become deeper and deeper after being honed by practice. For some people, their married life is not very good, they will often quarrel, and finally the relationship breaks down and leads to divorce.

I think if one party cares a lot about the relationship, it really won't be happy, but if both parties are suitable and have similar interests, then how can you say that they won't be happy?

No. Two people still have to have a little emotional foundation when they get married, otherwise it will be difficult to face the dullness of life.

That will definitely not be happy, so you should be cautious about such a marriage.

Marriage without love will not lead to happiness, and love cannot be exchanged for money and material things.

The meaning of this sentence, to sum up, is that the happiness of marriage has nothing to do with money and material things in the end!

Is that really the case?

For a marriage without money and a house, is there no happiness at all? Perhaps, the answer is not absolute. I am afraid that this problem needs to be different from person to person, and it needs to be analyzed on a case-by-case basis.

However, in today's society that advocates material consumption, in an era when everyone is accustomed to taking cars, houses, and tickets as a measure of the advantages and disadvantages of marriage and love conditions, if these practical factors are not considered at all in marriage, two people only live in a vacuum, I am afraid it is not realistic.

To be honest, in marriage, if you don't have money or a house, it will affect the happiness of the marriage to some extent, there is no doubt about it. After all, love is the ideal, marriage is the reality, many times, the ideal is very plump, the reality is very skinny, and even for the sake of life, we have to make compromises and concessions to the reality.

Of course, a truly happy couple must not rely entirely on the consumption of material things, but should allow two people to establish a bond on the spiritual level. Let each other have affection, heart-to-heart, and true feelings, because the husband and wife in distress are the real husband and wife.

It's just that in real life, there are too few people who can completely transcend material marriage and become soul mates, and most people are still easily coerced by secular married life.

This is also something that cannot be helped, even Marx and his old man said that marriage is easy to make people mediocre, because marriage has a worldly side.

In fact, for marriage, especially for a woman, no money and no house in marriage is not the most terrible, the most terrible thing is that there is no love in marriage.

Just like what happened to the woman below, it seems that this is the case in her marriage.

No, getting married and not having a house is tantamount to playing hooligan.

If you are not married and buy a house, you can write the names of two people. If the two parties jointly sign the purchase contract, the names of two people can be registered on the real estate certificate, and the property owner can only write the name of one person in the model travel code, and the number of people in the column of the total town leakage is not limited, and the property can be identified as jointly owned by both parties.

Article 297 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China: Immovable or movable property may be jointly owned by two or more organizations or individuals. Co-ownership includes co-ownership and co-ownership. Article 301 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China The disposition of jointly owned immovable or movable property and the major repair or change of the nature or use of jointly owned immovable or movable property shall be subject to the consent of the co-owners or all co-owners accounting for more than two-thirds of the shares, unless otherwise agreed between the co-owners.