-
Should a husband and wife break down and try to maintain the marriage for the sake of their children? If the relationship between husband and wife breaks down, can they still maintain their marriage for the sake of their children? This is indeed a difficult question to choose, whether to continue to carry it or to learn to let go.
So I'll share my thoughts and make my suggestions. Every happy family.
are all roughly the same, husband and wife love, so that you have me, I have you, mutual tolerance, mutual understanding. Even if there is a mountain in front of you, or the sea in front of you, husband and wife are of the same heart, and their profits and gold can be crossed together. Share joys and sorrows, share weal and woe, and join hands for a hundred years.
In the common life of husband and wife, it is inevitable to encounter such and such problems, and there will be differences of this kind and that, which depends on how the husband and wife face this contradiction and deal with this problem. As long as it's not a matter of principle, take a step back, empathize and think about each other, big things are small, small things are small, and small things are still a pair of harmonious and beautiful partners. If family conflicts are not dealt with, and husbands and wives do not understand and tolerate each other, the conflicts will become more and more intensified.
In the end, even the little love that was left was wiped out, and if we lived together again, it would be like living with a zombie and the walking dead, there was no difference. If you lose the meaning of life, it is better to learn to let go and choose again is wise.
But your situation is different, you have a child, although the husband and wife have no feelings, but they can't give up the child, and they both want to give the child a complete home. If you want me to say, since it is for the sake of the child, for the sake of the child, besides, life is short, and cherish it, then you must give up the contradictions, rebuild the bridge of love, the key is to learn to respect and understand each other, under the bond of this child, you will be reconciled as before. In fact, if you don't want to hurt your child, you should know that what you need to do is not to maintain, but to find a way to improve the relationship between husband and wife, and to communicate and understand more to get love back.
But if you really can't get by, and the child will also affect his growth in your quarrels, then don't force yourself to maintain the marriage, otherwise you will make yourself more tired.
-
No, maintaining a marriage for the sake of the child does not make the child happy, it only makes everyone feel miserable, and the child can feel the breakdown of the relationship between the parents.
-
If the relationship between husband and wife breaks down, the marriage should not be maintained for the sake of the children. Growing up in a family with a discordant family atmosphere has a greater impact on children.
-
I don't think you should maintain your marriage for the sake of your children, because if your children live in an unhappy family, it will have a great impact on them.
-
Although there are many couples whose relationship has broken down in real life, considering that the children are relatively young, they don't want to bring a certain shadow and harm to the children's growth because of the divorce of the two people, so they choose to continue with each other and not divorce, but for me, I can't do this.
After all, for husband and wife, if the relationship between two people has been completely broken, and the daily relationship between husband and wife has been inseparable, then in this case, getting along with each other is obviously a more embarrassing and painful thing, rather than this, it is better for two people to really communicate well, a thorough showdown, and find a life that is really suitable for themselves, although their children are relatively small, but if their children can understand, both parties should explain to their children, If the children can't understand the reasons why they choose to break up and divorce each other, there is no need to sacrifice the happiness of the rest of their lives by respecting the children's ideas completely.
On the other hand, even if the child chooses not to divorce, but the details of the daily relationship between the two people can also make the child realize that the relationship between the two people is more delicate, and more importantly, there is no affection for each other, so the child naturally cannot get happiness and happiness from such a family, so I personally think that since this is the result, it is better to completely choose to let go, maybe the impact on the child will be smaller. And more importantly, it will not make two people in a more sad or depressed state every day, at least let each other really get relieved.
-
If you don't want to fix it, then it's really better to get a divorce.
-
Kiss Hello Is it necessary for the parents to continue to maintain the marriage relationship for the sake of the children when the relationship is broken? : When the marriage exists in name only, and one party wants to let go, but because of the child, it becomes a lot of worries and is not so free and easy, so many people think that they should reluctantly maintain the marriage for the sake of the child, the purpose is to give the child a complete home, but is this kind of kindness, is it good for the child? Not really.
So, should you maintain a failed marriage for the sake of your children? Regarding this issue, I would like to say the following two points: First, you can maintain a marriage for your children, provided that there is still love in the marriage and each other's efforts.
Yes, when there are problems in the marriage, when there are conflicts in the relationship, we should not go for divorce on impulse. Divorce is not a solution to the problem, divorce is a solution that has no choice, it is the last option. Therefore, when there is still room for maneuver, especially when there are children, we should indeed be cautious, for the happiness of the children, we can continue to maintain, but there is a premise here, that is, two people in marriage still love each other, although there are problems, but there are still emotional involvement, and each other has the heart to maintain well.
Although I can't find a solution for a while, and even exclude each other, I can't deceive myself into giving up, and I still feel distressed when the other party has a problem or encounters a setback. But don't expect that, after all, only by finding out the problem and communicating more can you completely solve the problem.
Second, don't want to let go, and don't take the child to kidnap the marriage.
Although, from the perspective of our children, we need to be cautious about marriage, which is the way we should think. However, although one party is reluctant to give up the child, but there is a problem in the marriage, the relationship between the man and the woman is broken, and the party who does not want to let go must not take the child to kidnap the marriage, and cannot use the child to coerce the other party to continue to stick to the marriage. If it is not for the retention of your inner feelings, if you have not realized the problem, if you don't want to change and just want the other party to sacrifice themselves to maintain the marriage, and the contradictions in the marriage still exist, the marriage in which you kidnap the children will eventually hurt the children, and the impact of this injury on the children may be accompanied by life.
Therefore, the superficial integrity of marriage is not happiness, but more likely to be buried in the hidden danger of unhappiness.
Therefore, if the relationship has broken down and completely broken down, even if you have children, don't be reluctant to be together, and the result of swallowing your anger is to suppress yourself and hurt your children. If you are really maintaining for the sake of your children, then you should also adjust yourself, not just to maintain, but also to improve and promote. Since you can't leave, let's live well, so it's really for the sake of the child!
-
Do I need to maintain my marriage for the sake of my children? If it were you, what would you do?
I don't think it's necessary to maintain my unhappy marriage for the sake of my children, and I don't care about several reasons for maintaining my marriage for my children: First, the children are too young, and we must give the children a complete home and let the children grow up in a complete family. Second, the child is going to school, a little older, and thinking that it will not affect the child's test performance.
3. The child gets married, because the divorce will cause the division of property, and if the father is unwilling to buy a house for the child, the child's marriage process will also be frustrated. Basically, I want to maintain the original marriage for these things, but I want to ask if it is really worth it?
When there is a crack in the parents' marriage, and they live together day and night, the child is the most direct bystander, and can clearly feel that the parents' feelings are in trouble, and the most important thing to do at this time is to channel the child's psychology in time. However, parents cover their ears and steal the bell for their children, which will only make children become timid, afraid that they will be abandoned by their parents if they do something wrong, become more and more depressed, and cannot express their emotions. Not only does I become sensitive to my parents, but when I get along with others, I also wonder if I'm not good enough, and other people don't play with me, and the whole person will become more inferior.
Although living in a complete family, it is only a shell, and children in this environment are more likely to have psychological problems.
Many parents will say that I maintain an unhappy marriage for my children, I have paid so much for my children, and my children don't know how to be grateful, but is all this really what my children want? Since the marriage is already unhappy, let go as soon as possible, guide the child in time, and give more care and love, so that the child will be more confident and cheerful.
-
If the marriage really breaks down, then if it is not for the other party to temporarily maintain the marriage for the sake of the children because of something that undermines the principles, because no matter what, divorce is an invisible blow to the children.
-
If you go through your own, you can truly exchange the happiness of your children, and I must give kudos to these parents and praise the selfless dedication. However, after many situations and analyses, the reality is cold. For children, this phenomenon is more like an illusion that we can't see behind the information.
Husband and wife are already broken, or do you want to have a child? If we don't know the experience of others, don't advise others on how to do it. I believe that every family that has always been consistent for their children must have their own priceless cause, even if that reason doesn't seem to be enough.
The consequences of causing oneself will be borne by you. Our discussion now does not imply how others "should", but rather through the content of the discussion, to refer to the person in this situation. The impact on the individual may be different, but I hope it makes people think.
My reason is that I was hurt to the child. This negative impact may affect the development of the child's personal character and the formation of marriage. What state can we recall?
The mother will frown and have a hard time showing a smile, and his father will be depressed and having a hard time showing consideration and care. Children grow up in these families, at least lacking education. Such an outcome will not occur at that time and may be reflected in future treatment and marriage.
When we say "is a child", there are two questions that we need to think about. Adults exert emotions on children. He will cause the husband and wife to lose each other, the equivalent of a child, which is equivalent to the pain given to him.
The so-called child, it is actually a personal issue, that is, he (she) himself can not be in the situation after the divorce. He or she is unable to raise the child after marriage, or the child cannot live happily after losing one of them. These are all expectations of yourself, but they may not be true.
Because even after separation, both parties can still express their care and practice of caring for children, unless you form a serious hostile state and you even hate or even "old death".
From a child's point of view, they would rather see their parents' respective lives than suffer them. How to take better and more dedicated care of your child, solve life, and do not take the problem so that the problem is not clothed.
-
I think that after the marriage breaks down, you should not continue to maintain it for the sake of your children, because this will only cause greater discord, and it will not provide a good environment for your children to grow up.
-
Of course not, after a marriage breaks down, it can't be barely maintained for the sake of the children, and the marriage should be ended.
-
Of course not, after all, the marriage is your own, you can explain the situation to your children, and you don't need to continue to maintain it.
-
If there is a problem between husband and wife, you should find a way to solve it, you should communicate, open the knot, if the relationship is really broken, there is no need to endure it for the sake of the child, after all, the family relationship is not harmonious and it is not good for the child.
-
I don't think so, the child should not be a stumbling block for us, if we sacrifice ourselves for him, the child will also have a very serious mental burden in the future, so I think don't involve the child on the facts.
-
No. If there is an emotional problem between the husband and wife, the first thing should be a good communication between the husband and wife, and if the relationship between the two people is indeed broken, then don't endure it for the sake of the child.
-
I don't think it's necessary, since there is a rift in the relationship between two people, you can't endure it because of the child, because if you endure it, it will explode one day.
-
There is no need to endure it, if the relationship breaks down, you will be very miserable in such a marriage, and you should not ruin your life for the sake of your children.
-
Yes, if you want your children not to grow up in a single-parent family, you must learn to be patient.
-
No, blindly forbearance will make it more painful for children to be caught in the middle, so you must not compromise on everything.
If the relationship is irreparably broken, you should choose to let go, let each other relax, treat each other will, don't just live a life, that will be very tired, will not be happy.
When the relationship between the husband and wife breaks down, you can directly write the divorce agreement that the relationship between the husband and wife has broken down. There is no way to redeem it, and it has reached the point of no return, and it is going to be divorced, so just write it like this, and then write some additional conditions. For example, divorce requires child custody, or property and so on, these can be written.
Indemnify? Now, the premarital property can not be divided after the divorce. >>>More
There will be, because there must be a reason for everything, and a good relationship will not break up when it is broken. Besides, if two people are together and don't feel anything at all, then it is meaningless to be reluctantly together. Therefore, before a relationship breaks down, two people can feel the strangeness of each other's hearts.
Let it go. All your feelings are built on money.
Although it is difficult to maintain a relationship without money, it is also difficult to sustain such a relationship if it is built on money. >>>More