Is there any connection between the uncertainty principle and Schr dinger s cat and observer utilit

Their relationship is a folded relationship, because cats also have a lot of uncertain properties. Just as uncertain mechanics is uncertain, the relationship between them is particularly ridiculous.

Answer: The uncertainty principle of quantum mechanics is the study of the microscopic world, and cats belong to the macroscopic world, and they are not necessarily related to human observation.

There is no connection between them, the uncertainty principle analyzes quantum mechanics, and the observer utility is only the phenomena discovered by human observational experiments, which are independent of each other.

One is micro and one is macroscopic. Then there is not much relevance, after all, the starting point is also different. So it can be said that they are based on different points.

Creatures like cats are actually completely different from some ** in a certain principle, and they have no special relationship, and they are not related.

Although the Xue Mao test is an experiment, the phenomenon it wants to explain is a philosophy. By the time this thought experiment was proposed, it had already achieved its intended purpose, which was to deny the superposition of quanta. So there is no need to continue arguing on this issue now.

Maybe our earth is a box, we humans are cats raised at high latitudes, and life forms at high latitudes want to see if we humans can make ourselves die, and there is not only death in the box, but also eternal life.

Only people who don't understand this ideal experiment will want to do it. Actual experiments don't make sense, because the idea is that what you observe is the result of the outcome, and what you don't observe, whatever it is "in fact", is not meaningful to discuss, because the discussion is only possible for observations (including possible observational hypotheses based on known knowledge). Schrödinger's cat is primarily in a philosophical sense, which, of course, opens up new ideas of physics.

So, in any case, we can't test Schrödinger's cat thought experiment. Although we can't verify it experimentally, in the microscopic field, scientists have found through the study of electrons and photons that quantum superposition states do exist, which is a major feature of quantum mechanics, and quantum superposition states themselves also exist in the life process!

Since the microcosm has a quantum superposition state, and the macrocosm world is composed of a microcosm, does it mean that our macrocosm also has this superposition state? Theoretical analysis, there is, but it is very, very inconspicuous, completely negligible! It doesn't make sense, although the cat is in a superposition of life and death, but I only need to knock on the box to know whether the cat is dead or alive by the cat's meow, as long as I keep knocking on the cat, there is no superposition.

This thought experiment illustrates the paradoxical nature of Gogoban quantum mechanics, where concepts such as uncertainty and superposition do not conform to nature! Of course, this does not mean that I am not a materialist, but I am still somewhat inclined to believe that consciousness itself is a substance, although I don't know how difficult it is to verify.

Because this experiment has already been decided, and it is a thought experiment, there is no need to redo this experiment.

Because the cost of this experiment is too great, and everyone understands this truth, there is no need to verify it.

Because people don't want to do it, they don't think there's any point in doing this experiment.

Quantum mechanics. Schrödinger's cat is a famous thought experiment on the superposition of life and death of cats proposed by the Austrian physicist Schrödinger in 1935, which is a deduction that extends the quantum behavior of the microscopic field to the macroscopic world. Microscopic matter has different forms of existence, i.e., particles and waves.

Normally, microscopic matter exists in a superimposed chaotic state of waves; Once observed, they immediately choose to become particles. The experiment was: a cat in a box, and a small amount of radioactive material.

After that, there is a 50% chance that the radioactive material will decay and release poison gas to kill the cat, and a 50% chance that the radioactive material will not decay and the cat will survive.

According to classical physics, one of these two outcomes is bound to occur inside the box, and an outside observer can only know the result inside if the box is opened. In the quantum world, when the box is closed, the whole system remains in an uncertain wave state, i.e., the superposition of life and death of cats. Whether the cat is alive or dead can only be determined after the box is opened, when the outside observer observes the matter in the form of particles.

The purpose of this experiment is to demonstrate that quantum mechanics has a supernatural knowledge and understanding of the microscopic particle world, but this makes the microscopic uncertainty principle become the macroscopic uncertainty principle, the objective law is not subject to human will, and the cat is both alive and dead against logical thinking.

Studying Schrödinger's cats can lead to one conclusion: everything is possible without what has been proven.

Just like the opposing view that the universe is finite and infinite, we cannot prove it, so the universe can be finite or infinite.

Or do parallel universes exist? Because it cannot be verified, it can exist or it may not exist.

And whether human beings have souls or not, it is also impossible to prove, so souls can be there or not.

To put it simply, it was a thought experiment designed by Schrödinger to represent the imperfection of the "wave function collapse" theory in the quantum theory of his time.

A cat is placed in an opaque box, which is then connected to an experimental setup containing a radioactive nucleus and a container containing toxic gases. Imagine that this radioactive nucleus has a 50% chance of decaying within an hour. If decay occurs, it will emit a particle, which will trigger the experimental device to open the container containing the poisonous gas, killing the cat.

According to quantum mechanics, when not observed, the nucleus is in a superposition of decayed and undecayed, but if the box is opened after an hour, the experimenter can only see "decayed nuclei and dead cats" or "undecayed nuclei and living cats".

According to quantum mechanics, when not observed, the quantum system is in a superposition of decayed and undecayed, which can be described by a wave function, which can be solved by the Schrödinger equation.

When an observation occurs, the system is no longer in a superposition state and becomes a state of one of the two, the so-called "wave function collapse".

Wave function collapse: refers to the phenomenon that the wave function of some quantum mechanical system changes abruptly after some interaction with the outside world to one of the eigenstates or a linear combination of a finite number of eigenstates with the same eigenvalue.

Schrödinger reflects the superposition of quantum systems through the superposition of the cat's life and death at the macroscopic level, and reflects the microscopic observations that cause the collapse of the quantum system by opening the box at the macroscopic level.

Schrödinger's original intention was that quantum mechanics itself would be incomplete without a reasonable explanation for the collapse of the wave function and the state in which the cat was located.

In other words, the theory of "wave function collapse" in quantum mechanics still needs to be completed.

A more general explanation is that the wave function has collapsed before the box is opened, and the cat is already one of the deterministic states of dead or alive. It's not about opening the box and observing the wave function collapse caused by this behavior.

This is the objective collapse theory.

According to the objective collapse theory, superimposed states are spontaneously destroyed when certain objective physical thresholds (time, mass, temperature, irreversibility, etc.) are reached. As a result, the cat will be in an exact state long before the box is opened. This can be said less rigorously as "the cat observes itself" or "the environment observes the cat".

Objective collapse theory requires some modifications to standard quantum mechanics to allow the destruction of superposition states to be allowed in the course of time evolution.

These are all clichés of Schrödinger's time.

In fact, the reality of the wave function collapse has not been completely determined; Scientists have been debating whether wave function collapse is one of the natural phenomena of the world, or whether it is just part of a phenomenon, such as a subsidiary phenomenon of quantum decoherence. In recent years, quantum decoherence has replaced wave function collapse as a more popular theory among quantum physicists.

To put it simply, it means half-dead.

Schrödinger hypothesized an experiment that said that if a cat is kept in a box, there is a device to kill the cat controlled by an unstable factor, because the factor that kills the cat is not stable, so if you open it and look at it, you don't know whether the cat is dead or alive, so the state of the cat can be said to be a superimposed state of death and life.

What is Schrödinger's cat? It tells you about parallel universes and quantum mechanics, and it's actually quite interesting!

I don't think cats are immortal, cats can only be poisoned and live without poison. The so-called immortality is just a subjective uncertainty when people do not open the box, because people do not know whether the cat is dead or alive. This does not determine or change the objective fact that the cat in the box is dead or alive.

It is inappropriate to draw the objective fact that the cat is in a superimposed state of immortality and inactivity based on people's subjective ignorance of the cat's life and death.

Mainly, it's your entry point that is wrong, Schrödinger's cat discussed.

What I understand is that the motion of particles in the microscopic world is close to the speed of light, so the state of the particle is ambiguous, and it must be measured to give it a space-time concept to determine its state, in simple terms, the particle in the nucleus of an atom transforms in multiple space-times, and when you measure it, it catches the ...... in our space-time