To what extent did biology develop to produce a figure of the level of Newton and Einstein?

Biology is more of a discipline in which experimental observation is more important than theory. The most important achievements in the history of biology, including Darwinian evolution, Mendelian genetics, DNA molecular models, etc., have all summarized observations into theories from the perspective of induction. The "theory" here is the first definition of "theory".

It is not easy to obtain a theory similar to the universal observable universe in physics, but this is precisely why biology has great research potential.

To sum it up, biology is still a relatively young discipline, and there have not yet been "theoretical" masters in strict definitions like Newton and Einstein, but there have been "experimentalists" like Darwin who have far-reaching influence in social sciences.

Do not forget that in Galileo's time, the development of physics was similar to that of modern biology, with a higher qualitative component than a quantitative component. Moreover, because biological observations are more important, even if there are "Newtonian or Einstein" in biology, their position in biology will still not reach the corresponding position in physics.

In any discipline, don't be presumptuous, and don't be indiscriminate. <>

I've always felt that biology and chemistry don't belong to science. I'm always radically skeptical if a subject can't be described in mathematics. ”

If you don't know about systems biology, don't you know physical chemistry? I admit that biology is not very mathematical, but it's not impossible.

The most important factor restricting the development of biology is the lack of technology to study biology quantitatively. If the quantitative study of biology becomes mainstream, then it is natural that biology be further mathematized, and general laws will emerge.

As for the biology Newton Einstein, which the subject has never forgotten, it has appeared, and it is Darwin. To be able to propose the theory of evolution long before the advent of genetics is undoubtedly a discovery beyond its time. And, "nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution".

Epigenetics may seem to present a challenge, but in fact it is only a further addition. Just as Einstein's photons were not Newton's particles, epigenetics is not Lamarck's use-and-forget.

Science has no distinction between high and low!

I know at least two personalities in biology, Darwin and Mendel: the father of evolution and the father of genetics, no less famous than Newton Einstein. Breakthrough developments in biology and chemistry relied on physical mathematics.

So, chemists are often using the work of mathematical physicists, and so are biologists. Although their work is also hard, the world likes innovative people.

It's not easy for someone like Darwin, but in the end, his research is limited by the study of microscopic DNA structure. <>

The problem captures only one aspect of scientific development, that is, theoretical development. The definition of "theory" here is often different, and from the perspective of induction, all conclusions summarized by general observations can be called "theories"; In a stricter sense, conclusions derived from strict logical or mathematical deduction can be called "theories". To be tolerant, one reason why a discipline of sociology such as economics can also be considered "scientific" in a sense is precisely because we define its "economic theory" in the first definition.

Of course, the question of "falsifiability" can only be put on the back burner.

Theoretical and experimental observations play the same role in science, but they have different emphases in different disciplines. Physics is more of a discipline where theory and experiment go hand in hand. The "theory" here is the "theory" in the second definition.

Newton provided a unified theoretical framework for centuries of classical mechanics, optics, and astrophysics developments, thus elevating the study of physics to a level compatible with mathematics; Among Einstein's major contributions, there are situations similar to Newton's that provide theories for observation, such as the photoelectric effect, Brownian motion; There are also theories of relativity, which provide a theoretical framework to some extent, and then wait for human observation to improve to obtain evidence. <>

Lucky people Science sometimes breaks through in a single thought This idea can change the world These people are lucky people A fire is not a single person but a group of people How long can this fire burn It depends on the country's goals and plans Days Geography People Maybe I'm an unlucky guy.

China has managed the housing market well, and the heart is all on the house gold panning, how can such a person appear! Money is used for education, scientific research, and entities can appear!

In the previous centuries, there were many great scientists, such as Newton and Albert Einstein, and they made great contributions to the scientific community. So we're going to be very interested in the process of them becoming scientists, and what field might Newton, Einstein-like scientific greats come from? In fact, they mainly come from the field of physics and philosophy, and the knowledge of physics and philosophy has laid a certain foundation for them to become great scientists.

Newton and Einstein were all from the scientific field of physics, but the scope of the scientific field of physics is very broad, and their research directions are different.

It should be fundamental physics, and the quantum mechanics that is being studied now is the root cause of many physics problems to be solved, and there are quite a few paradoxes waiting to be verified.

Newton and Einstein are both great scientists in the world, with extraordinary achievements, even if they have passed away for so many years, but the theories left in the world have influenced us so far, they are all one person to lay the foundation of physics, because with them a high probability is in the field of physics.

Newton and Einstein both created their own physics, and in order to produce such a person, they must create their own physics, that is, they need to overturn all theories.

Newton and Einstein were both great scientists, and their contributions were both valuable and incomparable. And they have all promoted the progress of mankind, and their spiritual and scientific results are worth learning from.

Einstein and Newton only combined some research theories of their predecessors, but Einstein broke the conventional physical limitations and ushered in a new era.

Personally, I think that Newton's contribution is greater, because Newton is the founder of classical mechanics and can be said to have laid the foundation for modern physics.

I think Newton's contribution was greater among these two people, because the society he lived in at that time was mainly theological, but Newton was able to put aside the traditional ideas and then create the classical mechanics system, and also discovered the conservation of angular momentum, which had a great impact on our later generations.

The next one can be with Newton, EinsteinComparable to scientistsThis one is not known, and no one can see this, so this one is something we can't see.

Albert Einstein is the only person in the history of physics who can compare with Newton, because he almost independently established a new system of space-time and mechanics. In fact, there were many scholars before Newton, but Newton is considered the founder of modern physics. This is because, because physics has developed into a huge system, it is necessary to develop a theory that fits this huge system.

And Newtonian mechanics is a good solution to the macroscopic low-speed world, that is, the physics of our daily human life. Not only that, if there really can be a master of physics like Newton and Einstein, it is really difficult to predict what he has discovered, and it has two major contributions that can be compared with Einstein, one is to discover the non-conservation of cosmic symmetry under weak interactions, and the other is to establish the Yang-Mills theory.

The other is the Yang-Mills theory, which is an important foundational theory that is comparable in importance to general relativity, or even more fundamental. Later, scholars discovered many electric and magnetic phenomena, but there has been no way to explain these two phenomena well. As a result, Maxwell was born, and one of the more famous problems was the unification of general relativity and quantum mechanics.

The general theory of relativity is generally used to solve the problem of gravity on massive celestial bodies.

In the development of scientific theories must follow such a pathOnly when observation technology has risen, resulting in a huge "error" between existing theories and reality, it is very likely that new theories will emerge.

Hawking's achievements naturally cannot be compared with Einstein and Newton, these two figures.

Newton and Einstein were both very good scientists, and the next person is unknown.

Personally, I think this person should be Hawking, but he has unfortunately passed away.

I don't think I can tell who it is yet, but I'll definitely know it in the future.

This may not be known now, because no one can predict what will happen in the future.

One or two sentences are not clear, and a book may be needed to explain the reason.

I don't know about this, it's very difficult to reach this height now.

I think there are a lot of people, because scientists nowadays are very smart.

This is not particularly clear for the time being, and I believe it will be known in the near future.

Maybe that's because this person hasn't shown up yet.

In my personal opinion, I think Einstein had a greater impact on human history, because Einstein single-handedly created a breakthrough contribution, and he can be described as a god in physics.

Newton and Albert Einstein were two great men in science, and their achievements were different. Newton, summed up the three laws of motion, discovered the law of gravitation, founded calculus and established the basis of the theory of planetary laws, etc., laid the foundation of classical physics, and Einstein made outstanding contributions to the theory of relativity and quantum mechanics, as well as the unified field theory of the universe and gravity and electromagnetism, and of course much more than that.

Newton's achievements are based on the achievements of his predecessors, which can be said to be standing on the shoulders of giants, and Einstein's achievements are due to his own unique way of thinking, the courage to boldly innovate, Einstein laid the foundation of modern physics, and made great contributions to physics.

Of course, not only in terms of science, Einstein's attainments are very profound, but also in terms of dealing with people, Einstein also did a very good job, he dedicated his life to the future of the country, and also worked hard to cultivate talents for the country, hoping that there are talents who can make the country more prosperous.

All in all, in my personal opinion, not only because Einstein has a great impact on human history because of many of his scientific achievements, but also because Einstein devoted himself to national construction, I think Einstein has had a greater impact on human history.

Who is greater, Newton or Einstein? It depends on what angle you look at, if you stand in mathematics, you must be greater Newton, he founded calculus profoundly influenced the whole science, Einstein's general theory of relativity uses Riemannian geometry in calculus, it can be said that there is no general relativity without calculus. If we only talk about physics, Einstein will be even greater, he accounts for almost half of physics, he has made significant contributions to quantum mechanics, and the theory of relativity is almost all his contributions.

Newton is most famous for his three Newton's laws and the secret of gravitation, which formed the framework of the modern physics system, and all objects on the earth must be controlled by Newton's three laws and gravitation, saying that Newton is the opening of physics, and there is no water. Gravitation does not need to be elaborated, and among Newton's three laws, the first law expounds the meaning of force, force is the cause of changing the state of motion of objects, the second law explains the effect of force, and the third law explains the nature of force.

Newton didn't just make these discoveries. The famous calculus, he is one of the founders, everyone knows the color theory, he discovered, invented the reflecting telescope, proved the broad binomial theorem, this series of inventions and discoveries, a person only needs to have a little is enough to become famous, and he alone has completed such a great feat, can not help but make people throw themselves to the ground!

But Einstein was no worse than him. It's hard to say whether it's harder to discover something or to improve something, especially if that thing is the right authority. Einstein's main achievements lie in three points, one is to explain the photoelectric effect, and won the Nobel Prize for this point (it was originally won by the theory of relativity, but unfortunately other Nobel Prize winners did not agree, and even threatened to return the medal, so they had no choice but to replace it), the second is the special theory of relativity, and the third is the general theory of relativity.

The great thing about Einstein is that the theory of relativity does not actually apply to Earth, it is more suitable for the universe and nuclear energy. Either of these two would have been unimaginable at the time, but it is remarkable that Einstein was able to discover those theorems in the middle of the world. Einstein's theory of relativity made it possible to use nuclear energy, made the theory of force more perfect, and he inherited and developed Newton's classical mechanics, so that mechanics can be applied to the whole universe.

So it's hard to say who has the more influence. In my eyes they are comparable, and you can't deny any one of them.