Can the achievement of unifying the four fundamental forces be comparable to that of Einstein and Ne

There are four fundamental forces in nature: electromagnetic, strong, weak, and gravitational. The first three fundamental forces can be explained in essence by quantum mechanics, and according to the Standard Model of particle physics, the action process of these fundamental forces can be described as the exchange of some kind of particle.

The process of electromagnetic force is the exchange process of photons, the process of action of strong force is the exchange process of gluons, and the process of action of weak force is the exchange process of bosons. And scientists have discovered the existence of these three types of elementary particles in nature, so if gravity can be explained in a similar way, then the unification of the four fundamental forces has been completed, which is also a problem that Einstein has been studying in his last days. Therefore, some scientists have put forward the concept of gravitons to explain that the process of gravity is the exchange of gravitons.

But the mathematical process of proposing gravitons is very redundant and non-self-correcting, and the existence of gravitons has not been found in nature.

Of course, if a scientist discovers the existence of gravitons, then at most he can win the Nobel Prize, which is also a very high honor, and this discovery will fill in the last missing piece of the Standard Model of particle physics, which can explain both the four fundamental forces and the basic composition of matter. This will become a crucial theory in physics, and the Standard Model of particle physics is based on Yang Chenning's theory, which also shows Yang Lao's scientific achievements, and Yang Lao deserves to be the first living physicist.

The current explanation for the nature of gravity comes from the general theory of relativity, and Einstein believed that gravity is not essentially a "force", but an external manifestation of the curvature of space-time. Because the existence of mass causes space-time to bend, and the curved space-time allows matter to know how to move. Einstein's prediction of gravitational waves (ripples in space-time) has also been confirmed, and this explanation of gravity has also been accepted.

Einstein single-handedly proposed the theory of relativity and made an important contribution to the formulation of quantum mechanics, so it can be said that Einstein, the two pillars of physics in the twentieth century, made great contributions. And Newton, not to mention, almost established half of classical physics. In the ranking of physicists in history, Einstein and Newton are firmly in the top two.

In order to achieve the achievement of these two giants, the achievement of Keye must be groundbreaking and subversive. We all know the importance of quantum mechanics and relativity to modern physics, but both theories have their own spheres of action and do not integrate with each other.

In the future, if we want to achieve scientific achievements comparable to Einstein and Newton, we can consider the theory of all things that integrates the theory of relativity and quantum mechanics, and the m theory in the current situation of string theory is more appropriate.

At the beginning of this century, the United States produced a ranking of contributions to physics, and Einstein and Newton were undoubtedly in the top two. This is enough to prove that no achievements at the moment are comparable to Einstein and Newton.

Of course. When the four basic forces are unified, people can better understand the relationship between the various forces, and when the celestial bodies move, it will be clearer. The people who discovered him were completely comparable to Einstein and Newton.

Yang Zhenning can indeed be compared to them, because there are relatively few such characters. Needless to say, people with such achievements are very powerful, very powerful.

The achievements of the four basic forces are actually very important to Einstein and Newton, but Einstein's contribution will be relatively more.

This is comparable to them, and these results are also a particularly important result. Then Yang Zhenning, a scientist, is very powerful, and he can be compared with Einstein.

There are still some scientists who continue to follow the path of Einstein, such as Yang Mills theory, to a certain extent, it is a gauge field theory, it has a certain degree of similarity with the unified field theory, but similarity is the same thing, in fact, the two are also different, because their research direction is mainly in quantum mechanics, Yang Mills theory is the Nobel Prize won by Yang Zhenning for this thing, it can be said that it is also a very great theoryBut there's no way to really push it down yet, after all, quantum mechanics is still a very high-end thing.

Gravitational force, that is, gravitational force, is transmitted by gravitons, is proportional to mass, inversely proportional to distance, long-range force, is the weakest of the four forces, and is proposed in Einstein's theory of relativity whose essence is the curvature of space-time.

The electromagnetic force is divided into positive and negative poles, and the charge, that is, the positive and negative poles of the magnetic pole, are the repulsive force, and the opposite is the attraction force, which is transmitted by photons, which is directly proportional to the electric amount, and the distance is inversely proportional, and the long-range force is the second strongest among the four forces.

The weak force is the force that causes the decay of the type of decay, transmitted by the Higgs particle (w+, w-, z0), which is relatively weak, and the short-range force, acting on the particle of the quark class, is the third strongest among the four forces.

The strong force is the force of attraction between quarks, which is transmitted by gluons, where the binding of protons and neutrons in the nucleus is its additional effect is transmitted by mesons, within the effective distance, the greater the distance, the greater the force, and the short-range force, which is the strongest of the four fundamental forces.

It is best to describe all the physical theories in one theory, but no one can do it yet, and the reason why Newton and Einstein have been talked about is because they have unified a part, although they have not yet been unified, but their achievements are also worth showing off.

At present, scientists have adopted the Standard Model of particle physics to unify the three forces of strong force, weak force and electromagnetic force, and realize the transfer through the boson, but there are four forces, and the gravitational force has not yet been unified.

It is worth mentioning that if someone can unify the four forces, it will go down in history.

But don't think that you can surpass Einstein and Newton, because their contributions are unprecedented and unprecedented, because in the early stage of the development of physics, complexity can still be accepted by a person, and it is genius who does well in the face of this low complexity. Einstein and Newton were able to discover a lot of things by thinking, and in the present, the times are different and the present is different from the past.

Yes. But if we talk about the unification of the four basic forces, I don't think this can be done by one person. It is likely that it will take the work of a group of people or even several generations, as in quantum mechanics.

In that case, each of these individual physicists would probably not be able to surpass Newton and Einstein. It is highly likely that Newton's single-handedly pushing human science forward in n years is not replicable.

If there is one person who unifies the four fundamental forces, then he will definitely surpass Newton and Einstein, because Newton and Einstein are only studying one basic interest.

If one day someone really unifies the four fundamental forces, then it must surpass Newton, Einstein, Newton and Einstein have been studying these four fundamental forces.

If this kind of achievement is achieved, it is possible to surpass the latter two, and this theory is more basic.

What are the Four Fundamental Forces? If someone could unify it, would he be able to surpass Einstein?

Even if someone unifies the quantum and relative and solves the problem of the existence of particles, it is the call of the times and the theoretical transcendence.

Scientific research is not about surpassing anyone. Transcendence is the progress of scientific development.

Unification is what provokes what is good for unification.

This topic itself is wrong, and no one has achieved the unity of the four basic forces at present. If any scientist today can really achieve the unity of the four fundamental forces, his achievements can be compared to Newton and Einstein.

Newton is the founder of classical mechanics, Newton was born out of nowhere and lifted the veil of God, which shows Newton's position as the leader in the field of physics. Einstein in the 20th century can be said to stand on the shoulders of giants and took a new step, Einstein proposed the theory of relativity and made great contributions to quantum mechanics. The theory of relativity and quantum mechanics are the two pillars that underpinned 20th-century physics, and it is not an exaggeration to say that Einstein is called the smartest brain today.

The four fundamental forces of nature include electromagnetic, strong, weak, and gravitational. At present, the basic theory of quantum mechanics can essentially unify the first three forces, but it is not yet possible to unify gravity. According to the Standard Model of particle physics, the interaction of the first three forces can be expressed as particle interaction.

The electromagnetic force is the interaction process of photons, the process of strong interaction force is the exchange of gluons, and the process of weak interaction force is the exchange of bosons. Scientists have discovered three types of particles: photons, bosons, and gluons, but the gravitons proposed by scientists in gravitational action have not yet been discovered.

If any scientist today were able to discover the graviton, he would surely be awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics because it fills the gap in the Standard Model of particle physics. It is precisely such an important thing as the particle physics model that is based on Yang Zhenning's physical theory, which shows that Yang Zhenning is called the best scientist in the world today, which is not excessive. According to Einstein's theory of relativity, he believed that gravity is not really a force, but a bend of space-time.

Space-time bends because of the presence of its mass, and as soon as space-time bends, it triggers the motion of objects. Einstein's gravitational waves have been confirmed, but gravitational particles have not yet been discovered. At present, the best theory in physics is the m theory under string theory.

It attempts to unify the theory of relativity with quantum mechanics.

OK. Both Newton and Einstein made great contributions to human science.

Newton and Einstein are both the greatest physicists in history, and they are certainly on par. The fields of study of the two are different, Einstein's theory of relativity and Newton's classical mechanics are both scientific giants.

I don't think Newton can compare with Einstein, because Einstein's research on forces is more in-depth, the level of research is more quantum, and he will make greater contributions to the future development of science and technology of mankind.