Do you agree with the statement that a child s clothing and appearance can reveal the family s incom

The child's clothing and appearance will indeed expose the family income, and the rich and tasteful parents will pay more attention to the child's clothing for their children, and will pay more attention to some brands, and the clothes of the big brands are better in design and comfort.

Personally, I don't agree with this statement, some people just like to be low-key, obviously the income is very good, but they just don't want to show it, on the contrary, some people are very vain.

I don't agree with this statement, because some people are dressed very modestly, which does not highlight how rich they are, but in fact, they are all potential stocks, and I can't judge their family economy based on their appearance.

I agree with this statement for two reasons:

First, from the aspect of family life. Children with high family incomes are well nourished and physically stronger and healthier. Dress up well, a little wrong and willing to spend money to see a doctor.

Children will go to the dental department after teething, and electric toothbrushes and dental floss will be used to protect their teeth more healthily; The slightest bit of tooth decay will go to the hospital**. I have seen many children with low family incomes, who are really full of tooth decay. When the child grows up, if there is a crossbite or irregular dentition, he is willing to spend money to go to the doctor and correct it as soon as possible.

This is a lot of money, now children have to do orthodontics for tens of thousands, my sister's child went to do it last month, the whole cost is 45,000 yuan. This is not something that low-income families are willing to spend.

I have a friend who earns millions a year. Your child will go to the ENT for surgery to remove the adenoidal hypertrophy when he snores. Chronic rhinitis, allergic eczema, diaper rash will go to the doctor, perennial care is very attentive, ** care is also very good, moisturizer, lipstick, these are wiped every day, know how to apply hormones scientifically, and even go to the otolaryngology department for ear picking.

If the child has pimples on his face, he will go to the ** department of a tertiary hospital to see a doctor, and he will consult a doctor if he has abnormal body hair or weight gain too fast.

If you grow a little slowly, you will go to the hospital for examination, and if you are not sick, you will go home if you are sick, and you will not feel distressed if you need to take growth hormone: you will go to the hospital if you fall and break your skin, and you need stitches to fight for beauty and plastic surgery.

Second, from the aspect of genetic selection. According to Darwin's theory of sexual selection, each individual is willing to be with the good individual, so that the less good individual is eliminated. For human beings, individuals believe that there are these kinds of scoring conditions, appearance, wealth, culture, temperament, and social status.

Naturally, the higher the score, the higher the score, the other half. Taking these factors into account, it is very likely that the individual with the advantage of wealth will be combined with the individual with the advantage of appearance, so that the offspring generation will have the dual advantage of wealth and appearance, and then the offspring generation can obtain a spouse with a higher score, so that wealth and beauty can be combined.

Therefore, the good-looking child will expose the child's family income in terms of genetics and maintenance.

Disagree, the appearance of children is more or less determined by the genes of their parents, but it is not absolutely that rich children are good-looking, and children without money are not good-looking.

There is no basis for this claim, nor is there any scientific justification. A child's appearance is genetically influenced by their parents. And it's not that people with money in the family are good-looking. There is no justification for this.

Personally, I don't agree with this statement, because children's appearance is innate, and I don't think it is possible to expose the family's income, and appearance and income have nothing to do with it.