Who won your debate? Is there a big plus or a big disadvantage?

If you want to be undefeated in the debate, you must have a set of your own theories in dealing with people and observing social nature, and this set of theories must be able to justify itself and fully grasp it, so that you can be at your fingertips and adapt to changes when you are arguing. Second, it is best not to quote other people's words when debating with masters, it will appear that you are incompetent, you must at least learn to change those famous sayings and aphorisms to say them in your own form. Because no matter how much other people's words are quoted, they are also other people's, and the real masters do not disdain to quote the famous sayings of others or the ancients, but strive to make their words classics, famous sayings, and the objects of others' scrambling to quote.

3. You must not get angry when debating, whoever loses your mind first must lose first, no matter how the other party abuses and sarcasm, you must remain calm and reasonable, and you must not scold back in the same way, because in that case, you will reduce yourself to the same level as the other party. Fourth, no matter what the situation, we must maintain the posture and will to attack, attack is the best defense, we must look for the flaws of the other party anytime and anywhere, when the other party asks, do not forget to counterattack or ask back, and strive to grasp the initiative of the words to direct Citi to their familiar side or in their own favorable direction.

As far as the generally used competition system is concerned, the four debates are responsible for summarizing the arguments, and of course, the four debates should also participate in the free debate session.

For the four debates, it is more important to grasp and summarize the main points of the whole argument and express them fluently. In the concluding statement, it is best to have a systematic summary of the opponent's loopholes throughout the game and a short but powerful response, and then it is necessary to sort out our views again (but it is not advisable to suddenly put forward new points that have not been raised in the whole game), and if you can and at best have the sublimation of values, it will make people's eyes shine.

Debating Tournament Skills.

1. Attack the key points.

In debates, it is common for the two sides to get entangled in some trivial issues, examples, or expressions arguing endlessly, and as a result, it seems that the debate is very lively, but in fact it has gone off topic for thousands of miles.

2. Take advantage of contradictions.

Since each side of the debate is composed of four members, contradictions often arise between the four members in the course of the debate, and even if the same team member speaks quickly in a free debate, contradictions may arise Once such a situation arises, we should immediately grasp it and try our best to expand the contradictions of the other side, so that they will not be able to take care of themselves and be unable to attack our side.

1: We believe that the prevention of juvenile delinquency is more important than the family.

Family is our first school, and the words and deeds of our parents have a great impact on us.

2: In addition to a person's nature, his growth is inseparable from his environment and nurture. Its environmental impact is the most edifying and educating school.

3: The family environment is the first paradise for children's life and growth. This paradise is the first school that parents co-founded and shared responsibility for educating their children. Therefore, parents are also the first leaders and teachers of their children.

4: Guess that the influence and infection of children in the atmosphere of the family environment is beyond the reach of any explicit education. This influence and infection is a kind of subconscious edification or silent education. Therefore, we believe that the prevention of juvenile delinquency is more important for families!

First, we will clarify our point of view, and then refute the argument of the opposing side in sections, mainly using appropriate examples to prove the correctness of our point of view.