What do you think of the way the big copy of the world s articles is written?

The so-called "a big copy of the world's articles" is clearly an excuse for his incompetence in writing, which is a fallacy.

China's great writers from ancient times to the present, none of them have become famous by plagiarism, manuscript washing and imitation, Qu Yuan is not, Sima Qian is not, Li Bai is not, Du Fu is not, Ouyang Xiu is not, Su Shi is not, Shi Nai'an is not, Cao Xueqin is not, and the modern Lu Guo Maoba Lao Cao is not, these great writers' words have a unique charm, and this charm is not copied at all.

This is a very normal thing, in fact, the innovation of every thing is limited, and the same is true for articles, most of the problems have already appeared, and most of the content has been said, so it is very troublesome for us to create more things, but there are many kinds, if you copy it in a different way, it is actually your own originality.

Because all articles can be traced back to the source, they all point to the final original article, and after the original article is mixed with the personal thoughts and personal opinions of countless people, it will evolve into countless articles of various second and third generations that are constantly involved with the original article. All of the core content is derived from this original article. Therefore, "a big copy of the world's articles".

Disagree! It is still acceptable to appropriately learn from or find your own writing ideas through other people's articles, but if you directly copy them, it seems to save time and is actually irresponsible to yourself, because your own writing cannot be exercised a little bit, and you do not respect the fruits of other people's labor enough.

This method is based on science, we don't have to repeat the mistakes made by others, we must absorb the essence of others, go to the dross, not on the surface, and the surface is pure plagiarism, and learning from other people's methods of analyzing things and good ways can get twice the result with half the effort, digest and absorb into their own things, and write the article better.

If you want to write articles for a long time and go further, of course, you have to be original, and there are really no writers who become famous by plagiarism.

There is an essential difference between borrowing and plagiarism as it is, borrowing something that you are not familiar with and not understanding, describing it through your own language, and turning it into your own thing, which is also original; And the original plagiarism, to put it bluntly, is "plagiarism", which is theft, and may be suspected of infringement.

Copying must also pay attention to the method, not dead copying, hard copying.

This is not the right way.

A lot of articles in the world are copied, just to cover up the excuse that the articles written by their people are not good.

The real article, the real work should be your own, and it should still be created by yourself with sweat and inspiration.

How to Write? When I first started writing, I didn't know where to start, and it was normal to find other people's works and learn their ideas and structures. Plagiarism can only be almost the same in structure and content.

The same point of view, different expressions cannot be said to be plagiarism.

I feel that this has lost the original purpose of creation.

The original intention of writing an article is to share your own life, or share your own thoughts, and reflect your own understanding of life. If you copy other people's articles, you don't have your own opinions, you don't have what you want to say, then what's the point of writing articles?

I think it's okay to borrow from other people's articles at the beginning of your writing, but when you feel like you can write, I suggest you just need to think for yourself. You can't steal someone else's article. I think it's a form of respect for the fruits of other people's labor.

In fact, this sentence is about the role and meaning of imitation, imitation is good, can be better than the blue, and if it is just a simple imitation, it may not develop and gradually disappear.

This sentence comes from the full movie line of "The King of Destruction": "Not only everyone has a book to read, but everyone must have a practice." ”

King of Destruction is directed by Stephen Chow. A Hong Kong comedy film starring Stephen Chow, Zhong Liti, Wu Mengda, etc., was released in 1994. The film tells the story of He Jinyin, a cowardly fast food boy with a somewhat cowardly personality, who pursued the goddess Ali Yuru, wanted to learn kung fu and accidentally chose the ghost king of the rivers and lakes as his teacher, but in the end he got nothing, and finally mastered the "Invincible Hot Wheels" by chance, and defeated the Japanese with "Hot Wheels", and finally moved Ali, and the two fell in love.

A large copy of the world's articles is an ancient saying, and there is no clear source and author. This sentence is adapted from the preface of Sun Zhu's "Three Hundred Tang Poems" in the Qing Dynasty, "If you are familiar with three hundred Tang poems, you will not be able to make poems and chant." ”。

This sentence means that you often read 300 Tang poems, and even if you can't compose poems yourself, you can recite poems. Through repeated reading and recitation, you can unconsciously absorb the wisdom of the ancients, experience the author's inner thoughts and feelings, and be able to recite.

This famous sentence of Qianlong Jinshi of the Qing Dynasty and Sun Zhu, a retired scholar of Yutang, has been circulated for more than 200 years and is still popular among the people, and is often used to explain the truth of reading a hundred times and seeing its righteousness. Or the annihilator refers to being influenced by poetry for a long time, how can it be affected.

"Copying" here actually refers to the meaning of borrowing.

When writing an article, words, sentences, grammar, structure, concepts, and emotions are not original. The object described in the article is also static to a certain extent, there is "nothing new under the sun" in the Bible, and Zhang Ruoxu has a poem "Life is infinite from generation to generation, and Jiang Yue is only similar every year." "Not to mention the article.

The true meaning of this sentence can only be understood now.

I can't say right or wrong, and the answer is different for different occasions.

Even if you copy it, the copyright belongs to someone else! Why copy?!