Does being killed while eating in a restaurant have anything to do with the boss?

Eating in a restaurant, being killed, has little to do with the owner of the restaurant, in Henan, you eat due to food quality problems caused by the injury, the boss is responsible, I eat in the restaurant, was forcibly killed or other emergencies have a life safety, and the boss has nothing to do with it.

Being killed while eating in a restaurant may not be directly related to the boss, but because he was killed in a restaurant, the boss must bear responsibility for the safety of the person killed, so the hotel owner must bear certain legal responsibility. So being killed while eating in a restaurant has something to do with the boss.

If the person who killed the person has nothing to do with the restaurant owner, and the restaurant owner has no grudge against the person who came to eat. It's just that there are such cases of strangers.

There should be a relationship. Two people at the time of the escalation of the conflict. The boss should stop it in time. Or call the police. Because the boss didn't deal with it decisively. That's why it leads to killing. So the boss should have a relationship.

This must have something to do with it, he is the local boss who committed the crime on the front line, and he must be responsible.

It should be okay, the hotel is only responsible for the safety of food and drink, and has no responsibility for the personal safety of the outside world.

The boss has a certain responsibility to report to the police immediately, and deal with it in a timely manner through the investigation of the public security.

The owner of the hotel is not properly managed, and he is jointly and severally liable, and the hotel may be closed for tidying, and the owner will be fined.

Somewhat, the boss did not fulfill the obligation to call the police and persuade in time.

In his own business premises, he failed to protect the personal safety of customers, which is his fault, and he has to bear certain joint and several liability.

Of course, the boss will be investigated.

It doesn't matter, he doesn't know anything about the situation, and it's not that he can't save him when he dies.

According to the Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Personal Injury Compensation Cases

Article 6: Where natural persons, legal persons, or other organizations engaged in business activities such as lodging, catering, or entertainment, or other social activities, fail to fulfill their obligations to ensure safety within reasonable limits, causing others to suffer personal harm, and the compensation rights holder requests that they bear the corresponding liability for compensation, the people's courts shall support it.

Where the damage occurs as a result of the infringement by a third party, the third party who committed the infringement shall bear the liability for compensation. Where the security obligor is at fault, it shall bear the corresponding supplementary liability for compensation to the extent that it can prevent or stop the harm. After the security obligor bears responsibility, it may seek compensation from a third party.

Where the person entitled to compensation sues the security obligor, the third party shall be a co-defendant, unless the third party cannot be determined. of the determination. The two groups of guests had a verbal altercation during a meal, and after being pulled apart, it can be seen that the hotel has fulfilled its safety and security obligations within a reasonable limit.

Therefore, there is no need to be responsible.

The recurrence of a fight at the entrance of the hotel after the checkout and departure is sufficient to prove that the service and service relationship between the hotel and the customer has been fulfilled. In this case, there is no legal basis to hold the hotel liable.

As for the scissors and shovels used by one of the guests, as long as the hotel is not intentional or negligent, then there is no legal basis for requiring the hotel to be liable.