Which is good for tak55 and Audio Technica 4033?

Updated on number 2024-06-12
32 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    If you compare the two, I personally recommend that you choose the latter, which is relatively more functional and has a better effect, and it works very well.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    Audio-Technica's is good, the sound quality is very good, it must be supported, someone has bought it.

    Very good indeed!

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    I think Audio-Technica's is better, better quality, and more affordable.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    I think it's better to have Audio-Technica 4033, he's more stubborn.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Your Audio-Technica is better, Audio-Technica is more beautiful, and the cost performance is better.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Which is better physical or Audio-Technica 4033? To send each has its own characteristics and advantages, they are also different in model and design, I think 4033 is better.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    I think the second 4033 will be a little more useful, you can do more comparisons and choose the more suitable one.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    In comparison, I still think that Audio-Technica's 4033 is a little better, very good.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Hello, I personally think that the victory tak 55 is better, I hope you can understand, I wish you a happy life.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    It must be the first, the quality is better, and the cost performance is higher.

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Get the first of this tak five five and iron triangle four zero three best, he because ***,

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    In fact, it's all about the same, and the cost performance doesn't have to be said, it mainly depends on which appearance and brand the individual likes?

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    Performance is a good choice, and what suits you is the best.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    Triangle four, 300 is a little better, because of this he divides a lot of religions.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    These two models of Desheng's Iron Triangle have good personal positioning.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    Which is better, tak five or four hundred and three triangular triangale I think is still triangular triangular four zero three notes.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    What would ok tak not cooperate, will be two-four-six-three-two-eight, this should be relatively good.

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    Which is better, Desheng tak55 or Audio-Technica 4033, the Audio-Technica 4033 with the left foot is better.

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    I just checked for you, and you'd better buy the Audio-Technica.

  20. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    This microphone is very cost-effective, and there is also a single capsule than it, Tak Shengtak55 condenser microphone, double-sided gold-plated capsule, 3 kinds of directional adjustable, cardioid direction, figure 8 direction, omnidirectional, quality appearance, clear sound quality, overall cost-effective.

  21. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    There are a lot of cost-effective microphones, and it depends on your personal budget range and what you're using it for.

    The tak55 microphone is currently a new favorite in the market, and its styling and performance are good choices for recording and entertainment.

  22. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    Jingdong is looking for Shuomeike, which is Shengli, the cheapest microphone, and I regretted buying it to hit me.

  23. Anonymous users2024-01-20

    Youduan's good, my conference room has been using it.

  24. Anonymous users2024-01-19

    Give us the biggest deal.

  25. Anonymous users2024-01-18

    Pinduoduo Pinduoduo must be the more people who spell the order, the better, and the same reason as small profits and quick turnover.

  26. Anonymous users2024-01-17

    Not much closer! If you don't look at **, it's 440! Or if you have an appearance request, just buy a favorite one! Just adjust the post-production effect better.

  27. Anonymous users2024-01-16

    It's pretty good, Tak Shengtak55 condenser microphone, equipped with aluminum box gold box, very exquisite, but also convenient for the use and preservation of the microphone, quite suitable for giving away, clear sound quality, no noise, double gold-plated capsule, this** can have this sound quality microphone, there are few models, you can compare and see.

  28. Anonymous users2024-01-15

    Relatively good, appearance, modeling, and cost-effectiveness have a certain market space.

    As a birthday gift for a friend, it is still very face-to-face and practical.

  29. Anonymous users2024-01-14

    It's okay too. If he loves to sing, this can be given to him.

  30. Anonymous users2024-01-13

    In contrast, this Victory tak55 is good.

    The winning thing is that the double-sided gold-plated large diaphragm has low-frequency attenuation, sensitivity attenuation switch, cardioid, figure-8, omnidirectional adjustable, all-round pickup and so on.

  31. Anonymous users2024-01-12

    Both have different characteristics,Tak Shengtak55Microphone and its**,Cost-effective,34mm pure gold-plated diaphragm double-sided pickup,Three pickup directions,High-end quality,Clear and delicate sound quality,It is recommended to compare whether it can meet your needs。

  32. Anonymous users2024-01-11

    The Tak55 is more delicate, mellow and full than the Levitt 249 in terms of sound quality and timbre.

    The 249's microphone is a bit stiffer in terms of timbre processing.

Related questions
10 answers2024-06-12

ls typical...

First of all, I have no opinion on the high cost performance of the M1 and SR60, but can I go out on the street? >>>More

11 answers2024-06-12

The Sennheiser CX200 has good bass, but not high.

The Audio-Technica CKS55 has a deep bass, deep diving, and good midrange and treble. >>>More

13 answers2024-06-12

Audio-Technica ATH-A2000X and ATH-ESW11LTD are relatively comparatively compared, and A2000X is more cost-effective. >>>More

9 answers2024-06-12

Aluminum triangle. 1) 2al + 2naoh + 2h2o === 2naalo2 + 3h2o >>>More

21 answers2024-06-12

CESAR's is very informative, thank you first.