Is it true that respect is an outward manifestation of harmony in social relations?

That's right, people need to respect each other, this sentence is right, if they don't respect each other, how can society be harmonious?

Respect for the society is the consciousness of giving a love to the society, everyone makes a little contribution to the society, and the society will naturally form a harmonious society.

I must be respectful first, only in this way can I maintain a better relationship, and I think I can develop better in normal times, I think this phenomenon is normal.

This is also a concept of socialization, respecting social relationships, sometimes it is very important and worthwhile to socialize on big occasions.

Solemnity is the most important thing in social relations, yes, respecting a person is respecting them, and then we just have to respect them, and then they will respect me.

I think there is some truth in the appearance of social relations here, and the external performance, only mutual respect. Then you will perform well.

Love is a momentary gift, there is something to have, there is no none. But on the other hand, love and marriage are actually not the same thing, not all love has to be married, and not all marriages have love.

If two people despise each other, then the relationship between two people must not be very good, and if something happens, two people will definitely exclude each other. Blame then naturally there will be no social harmony.

I think respect is one of the most subjective experiences of social relationships, and that is that you respect others, and others can respect you.

Standing in front of the people you love, your heart beats faster; When you make eye contact with the person you love, you will be shy; But when you stand in front of someone you like, you only feel happy; But when you make eye contact with someone you like, you will only smile. When you have a conversation with someone you love, you find it difficult to speak; When the person you love cries, you will cry with her; But when you're talking to someone you like, you can speak freely; But when someone you like is crying, you will skillfully comfort her. When you don't want to love someone anymore, you have to close your eyes and cry; When you don't want to like someone anymore, you just cover your ears!

Like is a mood Love, is a feeling Like, is an intuition Love, is a feeling Like, can stop Love, no end Like someone, especially natural Love someone, especially calm Like someone, sometimes I look forward to being with him Love someone, sometimes I am afraid of being with him Like someone, keep arguing with him.

Is it true that respect is an outward manifestation of harmony in social relations? This is also true, because people must respect each other.

Respect is the outward manifestation of harmony in social relations, and this statement is true.

The high degree of harmony between the social excavation and the faction is manifested in the harmonious and harmonious relationship between the people.

In such social relationships, communication and exchange between people is based on respect, trust and understanding, people respect each other, are willing to think of each other, and are willing to solve problems together with each other.

In such social relations, conflicts between people rarely arise, because everyone is willing to try their best to solve the problem, rather than being stubborn and only looking out for their own interests. The contradictions between people will be reduced to a certain extent. Just as the so-called "Datong Society" advocated by China in ancient times, it is precisely a manifestation of a high degree of harmony in social relations.

It is understood that the specific meaning of a harmonious society:

The first is the harmony between the individual himself, the second is the harmony between people, the third is the harmony between all social systems and strata, the fourth is the harmony between the individual, society and nature, and the fifth is the harmony between the whole country and the outside world. The focus of the building of socialist spiritual civilization is the building of an ideological and moral system and an advanced culture, and this is inseparable from harmony. In the new historical period, it is precisely the goal pursued in the building of socialist spiritual civilization to undertake and carry forward the ideal of a harmonious society in which harmony is precious and harmony is the beauty that China has advocated since ancient times, and to build a harmonious society in which people of all social strata live in harmony and govern in harmony.

The law does not regulate all social relations. du

Hobbes described the state of nature in Leviathan as follows: "The relationship between man and man is that of a wolf and a wolf," and that of "a war between all against all." Based on the fear of the state of nature, the Leviathan (state) arises.

People transfer power to the sovereign. However, Locke believes that the right to transfer is not all rights, and the purpose of transferring rights is to ensure the free exercise of rights. In other words, the purpose of accepting State restrictions on rights is precisely to protect the exercise of rights.

Reasoning from this logic, the state enacts laws prohibiting private remedies and restricting human freedom by law, in order to protect people's rights from infringement and to maintain a state of peace and security. Therefore, there is no need to regulate some acts that do not threaten peace and security and do not interfere with the free exercise of others.

For example, the contractual relationship in the middle of the civil law is regulated by law, while the benevolent favor is not regulated by law; For example, the marriage relationship is subject to the rights and obligations granted by the law, while the romantic relationship is not regulated by the law.

Based on the lag and limitations of the enactment of laws, the development of society will produce new relations, and all laws on social relations can be adjusted, which is simply impossible. Considering the relationship between law and freedom, all human behaviors, human beings, human beings and nature, and all human relations between human beings and society are regulated by law, which is an extreme restriction of public power on private autonomy and an extremely undesirable society.

To sum up, the law does not regulate all social relations.

To add to this, as for the point that "morality is not regulated by law" mentioned above, I think it is necessary to go to the relationship between morality and law. Not all morality is not regulated by law. If it is believed that morality is not regulated by law, it recognizes the "separation of morality and law" and takes the positivist path of "evil law is also law".

Some morals are regulated by law, and the stronger evidence is the principle of "public order and good customs" in the civil law and the principle of "good faith" as an imperial clause. The establishment of these principles is a manifestation of the entry of ethics into the legal field. "The law is the minimum morality".

Shouldn't respect be a person's inner thoughts? How can it be said to be an external manifestation? It is a product of man's subjective consciousness.

It is far from enough to talk about respect as the foundation in foreign-related exchanges, and we must also be good at expressing respect. The word respect should be the foundation of etiquette and the foundation of the way of dealing with others. Whether you sit, sit down, sit down, tea, tea, or good tea, the key is to send a message of respect to others through this form.

You want to show your respect for the other person just right. If you don't show him, how can you be hungry and know that you respect him? It has a problem with the performance program.

For example, when we receive foreign guests in foreign-related exchanges, we emphasize the three voices of reception: "There is a welcome voice when you come, there is an answer to the question, and there is a voice to send when you go", right? When you come, you have to say a happy old man to welcome you first, and then talk about things.

I gave a lecture to our comrade who defended the imitation office, and I told him, "If there is a guest coming, you must first ask how hello to the gentleman, and then talk about things, you can't come up and ask, who are you looking for, is the person a criminal suspect?" You hit ** too, pick up the microphone and say the first sentence, "Hello Chinese People's University", and then say things, if you can't come up, feed and feed, and then ask "Is there anyone?" "Isn't that a human being?

Then you are basic polite, you don't have this "three sounds", what are you?