What do you think about the detection of carcinogens in MINISO nail polish?

On September 26, MINISO fell into the storm of excessive harmful compounds in its products, and one of the company's nail polishes was disclosed by the Shanghai Food and Drug Administration to contain excessive chloroform information, which caused heated discussions among netizens.

1. MINISO nail polish caught in an over-standard storm According to the "2020 No. 1 Cosmetics Supervision and Sampling Quality Announcement" issued by the Shanghai Drug Administration, a peelable nail polish of MINISO was detected with a chloroform content as high, and according to national regulations, the content of chloroform must not be exceeded, so the content of this nail polish is more than 1400 times the standard. After this test, MINISO applied for a re-test, and after the re-inspection of the Shenzhou Drug Control Institute, the results were still unqualified.

2. Chloroform: The chloroform that exceeds the standard in the report of class 2b carcinogens is commonly known as chloroform. Chloroform is a common compound and is a prohibited substance in cosmetics under the Safety and Technical Specifications for Cosmetics.

It has hepatotoxicity, mainly acts on the central nervous system, has an anesthetic effect, has a damaging effect on the human heart and liver, and may even cause cancer. Nail polish is more common, but its composition is complex, and the quality of products on the market varies greatly, and if you are not careful, you may buy unsafe products.

Third, enterprises should strengthen their responsibilities and pay attention to the quality of products themselves, because of the diversification of its products, it is not expensive, so it is loved by many people, and the sales of daily products are also good. However, behind the low price, the company should strengthen its sense of responsibility and not use harmful substances because of cost reduction. As a seller, it is not the first time that MINISO has been criticized by name, and this incident also hopes that the company can ring the alarm bell and pay attention to the product quality itself.

If a company only wants to expand like crazy and does not pay attention to quality itself, the end result will not be good.

What do you think, dear friends?

According to national regulations, the chloroform content of such products shall not be exceeded, and the chloroform content detected in the tested nail polish is more than 1,000 times higher than the standard, which is shocking. However, what is puzzling is why the third-party re-inspection conclusion between the company and the first business is qualified, and the gap with the authoritative test results is so large that it is far beyond the reasonable range of error. Why the third-party testing agency can't even detect such an obvious substandard product, its testing process is questionable.

Is the third-party testing capacity insufficient, or is the testing conclusion being artificially interfered with? There is not enough information to draw arbitrary conclusions, but one thing is certain, and there was a major failure in this test. According to the provisions of the Product Quality Law, the product quality inspection agency must have the corresponding testing conditions and capabilities, and can only undertake product quality inspection after passing the assessment of the people's market supervision and management department at or above the provincial level or its authorized department; Product quality inspection institutions must issue inspection results objectively and impartially in accordance with relevant standards in accordance with the law.

Therefore, the relevant departments should investigate the qualifications of the third-party institution in accordance with the law, and if any institution or person falsifies the test results in violation of laws and regulations, it shall be fined, disqualified from testing or investigated for criminal responsibility according to the severity of the circumstances.

According to the facts, if there is a problem with the product, it should be the responsibility of the product party, but in the entertainment industry, the artist endorses the product and the product is paid, and there is a relationship between the two, and there should be a certain amount of responsibility.

The responsibility for the assumption of part of the responsibility. The effect of celebrities is very great, because many fans buy this product because of Aiyibo.

should be blamed, because celebrities must check the quality of the product when endorsing, and there are reasons for celebrities when there is a problem with the product.

MINISO nail polish carcinogens exceed the standard by more than 1,400 timesThe store manager involved responded: The responsibility lies with the ** business.

On September 23, the Shanghai Drug Administration issued the "2020 Phase 1 Cosmetics Supervision and Sampling Quality Announcement". Among them, MINISO a peelable nail polish was found to have a chloroform content as high, and the chloroform content shall not exceed according to national regulations, and the content of the product is more than 1,400 times the national standard limit.

After this inspection, MINISO was still judged to be a substandard product after applying for re-inspection. On the 26th, the manager of the store involved said that these substandard goods were sampled last year, and the responsibility lies with the first merchant.

It doesn't matter to me for the time being, my nails are only sticky grout, and I don't know if it's the same.

The store manager involved responded that it was a supply problem for the first business, I think he was too irresponsible, and the quality of his store's products should be controlled!

MINISO nail polish carcinogens exceed the standard by more than 1400 times, how to sell it, it should be the main responsible person, I don't know how many gifts were given, the store manager involved sells such a product, it can only be regarded as **, but also for his own interests, the conscience is too bad!

This thing. It should be borne jointly by the store manager and the ** merchant involved.

**The commercial production idea is extremely bad, and the carcinogens exceed the standard by more than 1,400 times. Or rather, it was done on purpose.

The store manager involved is guilty of negligence. The items put into the store are rushed into the market without quality inspection, which harms the interests of consumers and personal safety.

The problem with this supplier fully shows that this is a commercial deception that harms consumers. It is necessary to re-examine the entire industrial chain and seriously deal with departments and individuals.

These pull-level advertisements and eavesdropping on people's speeches are violating human rights and should be cured.

The store manager involved responded afterwards that everything was a problem of the first business, and that the purchase of goods was never inspected.

This should be a matter of quotient.

(1) Apply for re-examinationAfter the Food and Drug Administration released that the carcinogens of MINISO nail polish exceeded the standard by more than 1,400 times, MINISO immediately invited a third party to conduct a retest, and the results showed that they were qualified. Immediately, the Food and Drug Administration conducted a re-inspection, and the results showed that the nail polish of MINISO was still in a substandard state. In the end, MINISO accepted the results of the Food and Drug Administration and promptly removed the seriously over-qualified products from the shelves.

MINISO's products have had similar problems before, and now the problem of nail polish is also very serious, and many netizens have complained that MINISO has no clear understanding of their products, what does their products look like, don't you understand? In fact, I think what netizens said is also very reasonable, but their timely removal of those products also proves that they want to deal with these problems well.

(2) PerfunctoryWhen MINISO had a problem before, it shirked all the responsibility to the best businessmen. Their explanation is that they want to make a good product, but there is a problem with the quality of the goods, and they are helpless. Many netizens also don't buy it, complaining about why their own products can't be handled in a timely manner, isn't there anyone who strictly inspects the goods according to the process?

This matter has also caused a lot of public outrage on the Internet, and I myself can be regarded as a fan of MINISO for many years, this time I am really disappointed, and I really hope that MINISO will be able to do a good job in the future!

MINISO can also be regarded as a relatively take-off enterprise in recent years, they make a net profit of 8.9 billion yuan per year, but behind these RMB, we really can't imagine how many people are harmed by these goods, finally, I really hope that MINISO can improve its products and bring consumers a satisfactory and healthy shopping experience

MINISO responded that they contacted the first supplier and a third-party authority to do a re-inspection at the first time, and also did two re-inspections with the Food and Drug Administration, and the inspection results were all qualified and did not exceed the standard, but when they went to do the re-inspection again, it exceeded the standard a lot, and they questioned it. In my opinion, the Food and Drug Administration inspection is to spot check samples for testing, and the same batch of nail polish, not every one exceeds the standard, so there will be such a big gap before and after, all in all, since it was detected that there was a problem with its own products, it should be corrected in the first time, ** those products, so as not to more people affected by the product. Moreover, it is not the first time that MINISO has exceeded the standard of harmful substances in its products, so there is nothing groundless, and I hope that MINISO can absorb the lessons of these few times and make corrections to its own products, not blindly under the banner of cheapness, but also pay attention to its own quality.

Here, I would also like to say a few things about the beauty choices that women are used to:

1. Not all cheap ones are bad, and not all expensive ones are the best.

Nowadays, many people will think that the more expensive the better, but this is not the case. We choose something to see its efficacy and the people it is suitable for, and we need to consider all aspects, not just **, it is not the deciding factor.

2. Choose according to your own ** status.

At the age of 20, you should choose products suitable for 20 years old, and at 30 years old, you should choose products suitable for 30 years old. At the age when it should be hydrated, we should pay more attention to hydration, and at the age when it is time to prevent aging, we should pay attention to anti-aging.

3. Pay attention to its equipment table.

Nowadays, many skin care products and cosmetics will be sold under some banners, such as facial cleansers, many facial cleansers are labeled with amino acid facial cleansers, but most of them are soap-based, so be sure to see clearly before buying.

Capital is profit, can ignore the conscience, so nail polish product quality inspection, can be a fictitious, at the same time, there may be excessive carcinogens of nail polish, more popular with the deceived public, so manufacturers take risks.

Because this is the negligence of the manufacturer, the inspection is not very serious during the quality inspection, so the product exceeds the standard.

Beauty is the nature of every girl, and as our living standards are getting higher and higher, cosmetics have become an indispensable part of girls' daily life. But many girls, she doesn't know, not all cosmetics can be used, there are a lot of unqualified cosmetics, circulating in the market, the number is still relatively large, if you use these unqualified cosmetics, it will bring harm to your body. And some of the damage is done, it will be irreparable, and we can see this kind of news on the Internet is not unexpected.

1. MINISO nail polish is carcinogenic

MINISO, this brand I believe many girls know, but MINISO's nail polish was found to be carcinogens exceeding, and after this incident, MINISO officially said that when they received the unqualified report from the Shanghai Food and Drug Administration, they immediately sent the same batch of products to an authoritative third-party testing agency for testing. However, the results of the third-party testing are qualified, and as the first business of MINISO, Visco also arranged for the same batch of products to be sent to a third-party authority for testing, which also showed that it was qualified, MINISO said that although the test results were different from those of the Shanghai Food and Drug Administration, MINISO still respected the opinions of the Shanghai Food and Drug Administration, and removed all the products from the shelves and destroyed them, and MINISO also said that it would recall the batch of products. All users who have purchased MINISO nail polish can go to MINISO stores for a refund with the product or shopping receipt.

2. Whether the third-party testing agency is credible

As the most authoritative monitoring department in China, the Food and Drug Administration has such a big gap with the results detected by the third-party authoritative testing agency, which inevitably makes people wonder whether the third-party testing agency has cover-up and other behaviors. In addition, the company's other products must be strictly tested.

3. Perception of events

When we buy a certain kind of cosmetics, we must buy qualified products, otherwise, we have not become more beautiful, but caused damage to our own body, which is more than worth the loss, and we must have the courage to resist the merchants who sell bad products, and do not buy other products.

Two days ago, I saw the hot search of MINISO nail polish carcinogens exceeding the standard, and my heart trembled instantly, I looked at my hand, and remembered that I used to be a loyal fan of MINISO, I don't know if there are children's shoes like me, I will take my girlfriend to MINISO on the weekend, MINISO nail polish, MINISO hand cream, MINISO eyebrow pencil, MINISO water cup, and even I have bought the ...... for MINISO on the face when I was young and ignorantWhen I saw this news, I was shocked!

I think many people should be like me, very curious about their nail polish carcinogens exceeding, then what punishment will their company receive, etc., after all, there are still a lot of customers for MINISO, which is related to many people's health problems.

Let's take a look at the follow-up response made by MINISO company, on September 27, the relevant person in charge of MINISO Brand Center responded to reporters on this issue: after receiving the notice from the drug regulatory department, the company and the first business have entrusted a third-party agency to conduct two re-inspections of the same batch of products are qualified, and the person in charge showed the reporter the two test reports entrusted to "Zhuhai Intertek Guangdong and Macao Quality and Technical Services", and the test results of chloroform were shown as "not detected". At present, MINISO is appealing to the drug regulatory department.

It is said that the number of products involved is 401 and has been removed from the shelves.

This is the response given by MINISO, so what exactly the facts look like, the official has not yet given a definite conclusion. But let's take a look at the news released by the Drug Administration, in the first half of the year, the Shanghai Municipal Drug Administration organized a test of 963 cosmetic products in Shanghai, and a nail polish sold in a Shanghai store of MINISO was found to contain chloroform more than 1,400 times the national standard limit. And the remarks of the Shanghai Municipal Drug Administration also pointed out"The enterprise applied for re-inspection, and the results were still unqualified after the re-inspection by the Shenzhen Institute for Drug Control.

Although the outcome of the matter has not yet been decided, I think the NMPA's testing should not be wrong, and I believe that if the final test results determine that there is a problem with their company's products, then the company will be punished accordingly, after all, this is related to the health of many people, and should be severely punished. Let's wait for the results together!