I want to ask if it is a foul to block in the back of someone without touching someone s hand

Blocking is a reasonable defensive action, regardless of before and after, whether a foul is committed depends on whether the defender has unreasonable physical contact with the offensive player while defending. If there is no unreasonable physical contact, it is a good ball, otherwise it is a foul.

However, standing behind an offensive player can easily lead to a foul. Therefore, the referee pays special attention to the defenders standing behind the attacking players, so everyone sometimes mistakenly thinks that "a back block is a foul".

Note: One of the most important aspects of the basketball rules to determine whether a foul has occurred is whether there has been unreasonable physical contact.

The rules for back caps are the same as those for front caps.

It's just that the back cap is mistaken for a foul because it is easy to make physical contact, which is wrong.

When it happens to cap from behind:

The defender has the hand to touch the attacker"Foul on the beater", and no foul after that.

A foul is also awarded to the defender when there is physical contact, as contact from behind can throw the attacker off balance. (push or block), and then do not foul.

No, but it depends on whether your body has any other contact, and the regular game is very tight.

Even if you don't touch your hands, it's a foul if you have physical contact... Because you're violating the shooter's space.

As long as your body doesn't make contact with him, there's no foul!

This kind of block is the coolest, and it is relatively easy, and if you master the time difference, you will be less likely to foul.

No, .........But if there is physical contact, ......And it's more obvious, the kind will be blown up....

It used to be counted, but now the rules have changed, and it is not considered a foul. I mean the NBA, the CBA, I don't know if that's the case.

No physical contact is a good hat.

Indeed, everything upstairs says is fine, but I'm just late, alas.

When the cap is blocked, the first hit and then the hitter is not considered a foul.

The offense is a foul committed by a hitter when the offensive player shoots or when the defender does not touch the ball while defending the player, and hits the attacking player directly on the shooting limbs. A thug foul is a type of offensive foul, and an offensive foul is a player foul.

contains unlawful contact with an opposing player, whether live or dead, and the player must not pull, block, push, trip, or prevent the opposing player from moving through his hands, elbows, shoulders, hips, legs, knees, or feet, and by bending his body into an "abnormal" position (beyond his cylinder); Nor shall any rough or violent movements be indulged.

When a player is shooting, a defender accidentally touches the hand of the shooting player in the process of "blocking", which is not a foul if it is permitted by the original rules.

Strictly speaking, it's not a good hat. But you need to note that there are some situations where the result of the penalty is different, such as the body contact action is too large, or the action during the block is not very clean (there are pushes, bumps, etc.), you will be whistled for a foul, as long as you don't have similar redundant movements, this is a beautiful block.

According to the rules: if the ball is still in the opponent's hand at this time, you hit the opponent's hand, you foul, if the ball leaves the opponent's hand, it is not a foul. In regular games, the caps are generally not very strict.

Theoretically, any physical contact with the attacking team throughout their pitching is a hitter. But it's hard to accurately judge blocks and beaters in high-speed movements. My refereeing experience is 1

Look at the location. If the defender's horizontal position is higher than the pitching side, I usually award a valid block, and vice versa, if there is contact, I award the batter. 2.

See if there is a noticeable downward pressing action. 3.If the ball is shot and the defender hits the pitcher, it also depends on the situation, and if the hitter moves violently or has a deliberate tendency, the batter is also sentenced.

Because this kind of threatening action can affect the pitcher's action, it is unfair not to judge the defender to benefit easily.

It should not be counted as a foul if it is not in the hands of the person who holds the ball If it is not in the hands of the person who holds the ball, it is not considered a foul It is a normal physical contact, and the ball is still in the hand of the person who holds the ball, and it is a foul against the player.

These are the rules of the contest.

In a regular basketball game, there is no standard penalty for this kind of action, and it still depends on the referee's blowing penalty scale.

Streetball generally doesn't count, and basically no one cares about this kind of ball power.

The perspective of the referee on duty and the scale of blowing penalties are different, some referees blow it, and some don't blow it. Generally, the movement is not large, and the possibility of blowing is small.

Generally speaking, it depends on how the referee decides the penalty. Strictly speaking, it doesn't count as fouls, and these are more controversial. It depends on the feeling of the referee in the arena, he is God!

In short, don't offend the referee just haha

According to FIBA rules, such a situation is a handball and is a foul, and there is no controversy.

Basically, touching a hand counts as a foul. However, it depends on the mood of the referee, hehe.

Did the premise of the ball shot? Fluency of the cap! Generally, it is not a foul to fly the ball out of the middle and back of the cap.

Nate Robinson Guy Yao Ming.

I didn't see the referee blow the ball in the face first.

It should be counted as a foul, but it still depends on the referee's judgment.

Definitely don't count, I've had problems when I'm playing, no problem, it's a block.

Under normal circumstances, it is not considered a foul, mainly depending on whether your hand hits the opponent's body movement during the fall, and the "referee" of the penalty situation also varies from person to person!

Then it depends on whether he has a basketball shot, even if he doesn't come out.

In fact, the back block is also a type of normal block, the difference is that the defender is behind the offensive player when the back block, so the standard of the block should be used to refer to whether there is a foul. However, under normal circumstances, the back block is often whistled for a foul by the beater, because it is quite difficult to cover the opponent's ball without physical contact in this position, so the referee usually blows for a foul. But it doesn't mean that the back block is a foul, whether a foul is mainly based on a few points:

1. Whether the defender hits the hand of the offensive player.

2. Whether the defender pushes or pulls.

3. Does the defender have obvious downward pressing movements?

If none of these points happen, then it's a good ball and counts as a block!

Basketball Lessons: Does a Back Block Count as a Foul? Basketball Lessons: Does a Back Block Count as a Foul? Basketball Lessons: Does a Back Block Count as a Foul?

It's a good shot, if it's a good block, if it's a good block, if it's a ball that pushes people back to the ground, it's a scrum. In short, there is absolutely no offense.

In the NBA, if a defender blocks the ball with his or her hand, it doesn't count as a foul, nor does a block on the back of a streetball.

Since it's a block, it's not a foul, but remember to ask for a shot, otherwise the fighter will be fouled.

Ordinary fouls refer to actions such as hitting and pressing people that affect some physical contact, such as shooting and ball control.

Hitting above the shoulder is considered a malicious foul, one free throw plus one shot, and a technical foul refers to a foul outside of basketball skills such as swearing

In addition to being a bit immoral because it is a sneak attack from behind, the back hat is definitely a good defense

Not counted. Back blocks are easy to hit, basically this foul, back blocks don't count.

Very responsible to tell you that there is no foul!

In FIBA, as long as there is no physical contact, it is not considered a foul.

But the NBA is different in that in the NBA back block is a foul, which has been blown in the game and I have seen it with my own eyes.

This shouldn't be a crime! It depends on the referee's scale. As far back as I can remember, it turned out that the Spurs' Bowen didn't blow a foul on Nowitzki from behind. Howard Cap James just blows for a foul!

Not really! Neither FIBA nor the NBA said that... Those who say it is a foul are those who are blind to the people... You can make it clear to them ...