Can the physical system built by scientists be applicable anywhere in the universe?

Tsung-Dao Lee is a world-famous theoretical physicist, and in 1957, at the age of 31, Tsung-Dao Lee and Yang Zhenning climbed the Nobel Prize podium together for his discovery of the non-conservation of cosmic symmetry under weak interactions.

Someone asked Lee what impressed him the most when he was first introduced to physics when he was a student. Lee Tsung-dao said without hesitation: "It was the universality of the laws of physics that deeply moved him.

The laws of physics are characterized by a simple formula that covers everything in the world, and the gravitational formula applies not only to the fall of apples, but also to the rotation of the moon around the earth, and to the interaction between huge galaxies. Maxwell used four simple equations to encompass all electromagnetic phenomena.

Physics is so beautiful that the laws of physics discovered by humans on Earth will be true not only on Earth, but also on the Moon, Mars, and other galaxies. There are lunar rovers on the moon and rovers on Mars, and they are designed and built based on the laws found on Earth. They are able to transmit signals to Earth, indicating that the laws of physics on the Moon and Mars are the same as on Earth.

Human beings have not exhausted all the laws in the universe, and there are still many problems in the universe that cannot be analyzed by the physical laws that human beings have mastered. This does not mean that the current physical laws are wrong, nor does it mean that the physical laws are not universal, but only that the physical laws have their own scope of application. For example, inside a black hole, what are the physical laws at the singularity?

Scientists don't know about the singularity at the moment, and they can't use current physics to analyze the singularity. But scientists will work hard to find a way to solve this problem.

More than 300 years ago, Newton built the edifice of classical mechanics. At the end of the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth century, the edifice of classical mechanics encountered serious problems, and then the theory of relativity and quantum mechanics were established one after another. The establishment of the theory of relativity and quantum mechanics does not negate classical mechanics, but only gives the scope of application of classical mechanics.

In its scope of application, classical mechanics is still universal.

No, after all, what we are researching and using now is based on what we can see, and everything we can see is applicable, and if we can't see it, we can't guarantee that everything can be applied.

No, physicists have established a system of physics that only applies to the space-time observed by humans.

For the world of physics, this is an interesting industry, and everyone usually grows up in fact In short, there are also scientific research in physics, such as well-known scientists such as Einstein, Newton, Hawking, etc., but everyone usually feels that the mathematical laws that we know today are indeed applicable to the entire universe? Actually, I don't feel that it is suitable, after all, everyone is only settled on the earth, not for the universe.

In the early days, people even thought that the earth was obviously in the body, beyond the earth there would be no chemical substances, but through the development trend of science, this is not true, there is also a universe outside the earth, which is considered a larger in the body, so to everyone to say, everyone understands the enterprise data information, used to describe the universe, it is completely "big and small" meaningless, just a bunch of data, the universe is a new and upgraded industry, To be precise, the earth is just a small body in the universe, so we can understand that the earth is a star designed by the universe, and all the laws are only observed on the earth.

You can also understand that the earth is a star in the universe, and the rules of the earth are of course subject to the rules of the universe, but the local reaction has also changed, which will cause the rules of the earth to actually be the same as the universe.

Therefore, the regularity and rules of our earth cannot be said to be 100% created in the universe, and the scope of our specific exploration of the universe at this stage is relatively limited, only one-third of the galaxy, but the galaxy itself is only a medium-level planet for the universe, and it cannot be said to be a unique existence at all, so the universe has too many secrets, which must be explored.

Such rules of physics cannot be applied to the entire universe. Because the gravitational force and pressure on each planet are different, and the situation is different, such physical laws cannot be applied to other planets.

The laws of physics that have been summarized by human beings cannot be applied to the entire universe. Because there are still many unknown things in the universe.

Therefore, the laws and rules on our earth cannot be said to be 100% valid in the universe, and the scope of our actual exploration of the universe is very limited, only one-third of the Milky Way, but the Milky Way itself is just a medium galaxy for the universe, and it is not a special existence at all, so there are too many secrets in the universe that need to be explored.

Scientific research is always the foundation of our exploration of the whole world, and our scientific understanding is also a continuous exploration of physics and chemistry, especially the theories put forward by many physicists in the early days, which can be used even today. Actually, I don't think it applies, after all, the physical rules we explore are only on Earth.

Modern cosmology is a sub-discipline of astronomy and physics that studies the structure, motion, and evolution of the universe from a holistic perspective. Albert Einstein proved that both space and time (space-time) are inseparable from matter. The recognition of the universe as an evolving whole is of great significance in the development of modern natural science.

The task of modern cosmology is to explore the higher level of the universe than galaxies, and to study the spatiotemporal characteristics, matter and motion laws of the large-scale universe that has been observed so far. In recent decades, scientists have come up with some of the more valuable theories of the universe. The main ones are:

Einstein's model of the static universe, steady-state cosmology, model of the expanding universe, model of the matter-antimatter universe, cosmology of the great **, and inflationary cosmology. Static cosmic models have been rejected by astronomical observations. Large** Universe Model.

A widely accepted theory of the evolution of the universe. The gist of this is that the universe was created from a state of extremely high temperature and density from a "big **". The time occurred at least 10 billion years ago.

This model is based on two assumptions: first, Einstein's general theory of relativity, which correctly describes the gravitational action of matter in the universe;

The second is the so-called cosmological principle, that is, what the observer sees in the universe is independent of the direction of observation or location. This principle only applies to the large scale of the universe, and it also means that the universe is boundless. Therefore, the great source of the universe does not occur at a certain point in space, but in the entire space at the same time.

With these two assumptions, it is possible to calculate the history of the universe from a definite time (called Planck time), before which it was not clear what physical laws were at work. Since then, the universe has expanded rapidly, lowering its density and temperature from its original extremely high state, and immediately afterwards, processes that foreshadow the decay of protons have also caused matter to far outnumber antimatter, as we see today. Many elementary particles may also appear at this stage.

After a few seconds, the temperature of the universe decreases to the point where certain nuclei can form. This theory also predicts the formation of a certain number of nuclides of hydrogen, helium and lithium, in abundance consistent with what is seen today.

About another 1 million years later, the universe cools further and begins to form atoms, while the radiation that fills the universe travels freely through space. This radiation is called cosmic microwave background radiation, and it has been confirmed by observations. In addition to primordial matter and radiation, the Great Theory also predicts that the universe should now be filled with neutrinos, which are massless or chargeless elementary particles.

Now scientists are trying to find this substance.

In recent decades, scientists have come up with some of the more valuable theories of the universe. The main ones are: Einstein's static universe model, steady state cosmology, expanding universe model, matter-antimatter universe model, large ** cosmology and inflationary cosmology.

Static cosmic models have been rejected by astronomical observations. Homeostatic cosmology is not widely accepted.

In recent decades, scientists have come up with some of the more valuable theories of the universe.

There are many theories of the universe, and many of them have been proposed by physicists such as Albert Einstein.

The idea that scientists came up with parallel universes made me very interested in science.

One of the more valuable is the theory of parallel universes.

Cosmic gamma rays, parallel universes, cosmic large**.

emmmm, the universe is constantly expanding.

The universe is large**, the parallel universe, the universe is boundless.

The most famous is the ** cosmological theory.

Physics is just a routine study, and a lot of cosmic science is a lot of conjecture, because you know, purpose.

These versions of the theory before the DAO are too immature.

I don't believe it, because I used to be an amateur astrophysicist, and after I came into contact with the wider world, I prefer to call these studies useless wordplay that does not explain the real universe, life, and truth and the nature of everything. They try to describe a model of the universe with a better theory, I am very pleased with such people, but I also have to say that the sky is round, the frog at the bottom of the well insists on the best of Xiaofa and Xiaozhi, and talks a lot, the predecessors are dead, they have not created, they have never questioned, pure physics and matter cannot explain the real universe, if it is just such scientists, I would rather call them stupid children who only fiddle with mud and study why mud stains their clothes.

But their important feature is that the same behavior of academic research, the study of celestial bodies and galaxies.

I haven't been to Africa, so does Africa not exist? They are afraid that the real truth will come, and they continue to strengthen the study of the microscopic and broad universe, these theories have indeed been broken, I can't make them public, because there is no chance, and people nowadays can't accept the theories that can really explain all the illusory and true, relying on the fundamental truth of the universe to understand, into words, people are difficult to understand, now people have no cause, the root organ is too dull, but they are afraid when they hear it, and their hearts are slandered.