Whether social apathy depends on moral education or institutional constraints

This is not a question that can be made clear in one sentence or two, the indifference of society, it is a group problem, that has historical roots, China's history is to pay attention to the three outlines and five constants, the outline can not be said now, but it is often the most important part of the life of the Chinese people, the five constants are the five Lun, and these five Lun, there are no strangers, China is a country that speaks of human feelings, that is, the so-called acquaintance society, many times we do not go to those strangers outside the ** five Lun, we will not smile in front of strangers, We say that it is not our business to hang high, especially in this ever-changing world, every day is full of that unsightly thing, from the small moon to the unsupportable, we are also asking, why, because the cost of enthusiasm and enthusiasm attached to us by this society is too high, we forget to educate us from childhood to see righteousness and courage, we will pretend to walk away, not that we are not brave, but the cost of this society is too high.

It mainly relies on moral education and self-cultivation ......

Or maybe it's a little bit better. If moral education alone is not binding, the effect will not be too obvious. After all, objectively speaking, the quality of our people is still low on the whole.

However, relying solely on legal constraints is likely to be counterproductive. Starting from the child's parents and giving correct guidance, the child will improve his or her behavior. Starting from yourself, the people around you will change "habits" into "habits".

Mutual understanding between people depends on the support of society and society!

Although it is said that the social law is sound, there are also many people who take advantage of loopholes, and I have encountered some things recently, which makes me even more disappointed in this society. There is no progress without the law alone, without supervision.

I think you're lucky that you're in a very good situation right now (there is no communication except for the working language, and it seems that people are guarding against each other).

I'm different from you, the company I work in, everyone usually has a good relationship, I feel very good, and I even feel that Dawei has become a very good friend, but one day, in front of some small interests, the so-called friend is nothing, ruthlessly hurts you, betrays you, and that situation is much worse than you.

Wouldn't that be great? It's hard to make friends at work. There is no need to force that kind of friend, there is no need, others are noisy and wary of each other, you will also be defensive, there are too many fakes in this world, and it is a good thing to be defensive.

There is nothing wrong with people being selfish, but this society is like this, you are very open-minded and enthusiastic, the key is that someone will take it to heart? Will it cherish you? No, so it's good to be kind to yourself, you don't need to be charitable, just really help people who really need help, or people who are worthy of your help.

People will think about themselves by themselves, and selfishness is only magnified!

Sincerity and trust are built on your sincerity to people, and after you bury others, you will be like this!

Why not be enthusiastic, and people will get along better!

It is necessary to have a confidant, but it should be based on the absence of conflicts of interest. For example, if there is competition for a position, you have to be on guard.

Yes, rough friends, they are all cleaning and inspecting the snow in front of the door, but it is not ruled out that it is the reason for less trouble! I'll give you an example: I'm very careful when I talk in the workplace, and I only talk to people I trust.

I didn't expect a colleague to tell other colleagues what I had whispered to him in front of me, which made me very embarrassed. It also made my interpersonal relationship in the unit much worse! I can't trust people anymore!

I think we can take the method of punishment! But for those who specialize in deceiving others with other people's sympathy, there is no way to stop it.

The moral problem in our country is the result of the exemplary role of total power rent-seeking for the whole people.

If the upper beam is not correct and the lower beam is crooked, look at what today's leading cadres are thinking and doing every day, and the common people are still not learning from them.

Don't hurt others, don't be hurt by others, don't help abuse, it's fine.

Agree, if you don't give points, everyone will be lazy to pay attention to you.

The word "progress" is used incorrectly, and it is logical that the word "peaceful" is replaced by "sloppy".

Yes, except for relatives and friends, in the absence of interests, in this society, almost all strangers, that's all、、、

That's why society can't do it now.

Hey, after all, it's a stranger, and few people are willing to risk being cut by a knife to save you, and it's your own relatives.

What the three people upstairs say is the truth, landlord, you are too simple

In a word, everyone sweeps the snow in front of the door and doesn't care about the frost on others, this sentence is not only indifferent but also very ruthless.

I had a lot to say. But 0 points. The landlord is too picky.

When Western individualism has entered Chinese society, the Chinese people and relevant departments attach great importance to individual interests, but they have forgotten the team consciousness mentioned in Western individualism.

In addition, there is a general indifference among people in society to the politics and society of the country as a whole. leads to the indifference of society as a whole and the coldness between people.

But this apathy is not complete, and the people will be reunited when the country encounters emergencies, such as: **, etc.

In short, this is an inevitable phenomenon of society in the early days of the market economy, coupled with the increasing tendency of China's "night watchman", which leads to the emergence of social indifference.

But believe that if you're hot enough, others will be hot to you.

Donor, you are too pessimistic, the so-called sentient beings have many faces, not to mention that the face of the person will change over time, and the human heart will change with the passage of time, and the person who does not meet does not mean that there is not, and the well-wisher is not necessarily the standard like you, not that you do what you think is a kind-hearted person, in fact, many people and many things have another process behind, the donor should not only care about the state presented in front of you, you can meet, hear, see in the memory, that is a kind of harvest, It is impossible for people to turn others into themselves, and it is impossible for them to really control others, so you can't change your past, as for moral decay, I don't agree with this view, in fact, the so-called morality is just the standard required by the order, and many things are hidden behind the scenes and not as simple as what you see with your eyes.

Don't ask questions when you need a good person, think about whether you have taken the initiative to do something according to the standards of a good person! When asking others, it's best to reflect on yourself. Only when everyone starts from every little thing around them, can the social atmosphere gradually change and see a win-win society.

Don't dwell on anything, the key is to act on your own.

If you just want to see the good people, I suggest you go to some volunteer activities, listen to the stories of the volunteers, and when you meet the really good people, you will realize how small we are.