The reporter revealed that he was fired for interviewing Xu Zheng, what did the editor in chief of t

The editor-in-chief fired him to defend Xu Zheng, because the reporter felt that he should not change the manuscript, and the two of them had been discussing this matter and then couldn't get along, and the final result was that the reporter was fired.

Because journalists insist on reporting the truth. The editor-in-chief of the newspaper believed that the news should be revised according to the requirements of the interviewee, but the reporter felt that the facts should be respected, so he was fired.

Because the reporter wanted to report the truth about what was being interviewed, the editor-in-chief thought that the report should be revised according to the interviewer's requirements, and the two argued about the matter, and the editor-in-chief fired the reporter.

The reporter broke the news that the editor-in-chief was because he wanted to curry favor with Xu Zheng and because Xu had helped the newspaper, so he had these operations. At present, Xu Zheng has not replied to this, and I don't know what the specific situation is.

During the incident, the reporter had a disagreement with Xu Zheng's team over the strict implementation of the rules in the interview work. Afterwards, the reporter was fired by the editor-in-chief, who, according to the reporter, was to please "the big star".

The reporter revealed that he was expelled after interviewing Xu Zheng, how much energy does the team behind the star have?

What happened was that the reporter who interviewed Xu Zheng had already written the interview script, but Xu Zheng's studio asked for a revision, and the reporter did not agree, so he was cut.

It is said that there was a controversy over the content of the interview and wanted to change it, but after the time for the change passed, the reporter's leader directly changed and published the manuscript, and forced the reporter to leave because of this incident.

It is mainly caused by the unpleasantness of the cooperation between the two sides that the manuscript written by the reporter has been repeatedly revised by Xu Zheng's team. There may be things that are inconvenient to report, but this reporter is too "truth-seeking and truthful", and the leader has no way to fire him, but he should not be deducted from his salary, and his words should not be rude!

According to the article, the reporter interviewed Xu Zheng exclusively, but the interview process was not smooth, Xu Zheng's team wanted to revise the interview outline many times, and revised it sentence by sentence after the draft was completed, which eventually led to the leader using public and private tools in order to maintain his personal relationship with Xu Zheng, and even expelled him. Although this incident seems to be a conflict and contradiction between the reporter and his leader, the reporter also hinted in the article that Xu Zheng's team is suspected of putting pressure on the leader.

After consulting the leaders on some issues, they disagreed, and then reached an agreement, thinking that the matter was over, but they did not expect to be forced to be fired.

Caused by Xu Zheng. The combination of the two labels of an artist surnamed Xu and the conversion of cinema movies to webcasts, it is not difficult to see that this big star who is flattered by the editor-in-chief of the newspaper is Xu Zheng.

On the morning of September 18, a netizen who claimed to be a film reporter from the entertainment department of a well-known newspaper,posted an article on social platforms titled "In order to make big stars happy, the editor-in-chief of the newspaper fired me"., which has aroused heated discussions among many netizens.

The reason why this article has caused heated discussions among netizensIn addition to the reporter's self-exposure to being bullied by the editor-in-chief of the newspaper, he is suspected of public insults, abuse, isolation, hostility, salary deductions, and forcing employees to leave their jobsIn addition to other content, it is also relatedDirector Xu Zheng and Xu Zheng's movie "Embarrassing Mother"., Moreover, the source of the whole thing was also caused by Xu Zheng.

According to the reporter's oral story, on August 13, the reporter had an exclusive interview with Xu Zheng, and conducted an exclusive interview on the change of the movie "Embarrassing Mother" to the Internet at the beginning of the year, but the interview process was not smooth, Xu Zheng's team also revised the interview outline many times, revised it sentence by sentence after the draft was completed, and even after the deadline, Xu Zheng's team regretted that he was unwilling to mention the previous "betrayal of the theater" in the title and introductionI can't even mention the title of "Embarrassing Mother".

In this regard, the reporter decided to ask the leader in a dilemma, but the leader instead revised the draft according to the opinions of the artist team as Xu Zheng's friend, and said to the reporter: "If he can accept your interview, it is already giving you face", "Xu is my friend in WeChat, and he has also helped the newspaper", "You have to focus on interpersonal relationships".

After this incident, the reporter and the department leader had many discussions on how to deal with the matter, including a public conflict that broke out at the regular meeting, and in order to cause a worse outcome, the reporter decided to take the initiative to apologize to the leader in private, and the leader also expressed understanding and accepted the reporter's apology.

I thought that this matter had come to an end, but who knows, the follow-up leaders have made many attacks, and there are follow-up things such as public accusations, face-to-face abuse, salary deductions, and forced him to voluntarily resign, and finally, the reporter chose to publicly release this article in desperation.

The reporter's interview with Xu Zheng was not smooth, and he asked the leader for instructions under the dilemma, who knows, the leader directly issued a press release according to Xu Zheng's opinion. Because Xu Zheng once helped the newspaper and was a friend of the leader, the reporter couldn't get along with Xu Zheng, that is, he couldn't get along with the leader, so the leader forced him to take the initiative to resign.

It can only be said that in this industry, you can only bow your head and succumb to the world. Because he wanted to stick to his own ideas, he was slapped in the face by reality, this kind of boss practice is not right, but did the reporter resist the boss?

The reporter revealed that he was bullied by the editor-in-chief of the newspaper in the workplace, and was suspected of public insults, abuse, isolation, hostility, salary deductions, and forcing employees to leave their jobs. The reporter hinted in the article that Xu Zheng's team had the intention of exerting pressure, if this point is true, then there is no doubt that Xu Zheng is also inseparable, of course, whether the specific truth is true or just a guess by the reporter is not known for the time being.

I think this is the newspaper's fault, first of all, the newspaper leader should inform the reporter in advance of what can be written and what can be reported. And when the reporter wrote bad remarks about Xu Zheng, the leaders of the newspaper punished the reporter in order to curry favor with Xu Zheng, which is not right.

I felt that the journalist was being treated unfairly. When the reporter interviewed Xu Zheng, Xu Zheng's team asked for revisions many times, and when the reporter asked the leader, he was reprimanded by the leader, and he was asked to leave voluntarily afterwards.

I think the current society is a society of interests, after all, Xu Zheng still has a certain influence in the entertainment industry, and the newspaper must take into account the maximization of its own interests and future development, so I think it is very normal for the reporter to be expelled, the society is so realistic and so cruel.

I think the expulsion of the reporter has nothing to do with Xu Zheng, Xu Zheng, as the interviewee, has the right to request that the content of the interview be modified or deleted, and the reporter should also do what is required.

It should have nothing to do with Xu Zheng, because what happened after that happened to the reporter himself, and he did not respect the interviewer's intentions.

Being expelled for interviewing Xu Zheng also shows that the current fairness of our journalist industry is not too high, and it is not yet possible to judge the incident itself from an objective standpoint.

I think it's unfair to this journalist, when a celebrity and a reporter have a conflict, the newspaper should protect the reporter, not try to curry favor with the celebrity.

Poor people must have something to hate, I think there is some truth in this sentence, because the interview with Xu Zheng was fired, or the reporter did inappropriate behavior.

A reporter finally resigned because of an interview with the famous director and film star Xu ZhengIt turned out that the manuscript of his interview with Xu Zheng was changed several times by Xu Zheng's team, and finally the leader blamed the reporter for all the faults, and the reporter was also resigned.

After this incident appeared, the leader did not take the initiative to solve or comfort the employeeInstead, he chose to fire his own employees in order to make him happy, which really hurts people's hearts.

This is a film journalist who posted an article "In order to coax the big star, the editor-in-chief of the Happy Newspaper fired me". The content of the article can be summarized in several points: 1. Xu Zheng's team revised the draft at will, which caused the reporter to encounter great trouble during the interview, and then at the request of the leader, the reporter had to go against the original intention and revise the draft according to the requirements of Xu Zheng's team.

2. The reporter thought that the matter was over after the revision, but he didn't expect to be specially commissioned at the meeting, and was later notified to let him resign voluntarily. As a result, there is this article that has caused widespread discussion on major ** platforms.

The reporter interviewed Xu Zheng, but the content of the interview was changed by Xu Zheng's team, the reporter asked the leader, and the leader told him to write the report according to Director Xu, and because of this, the reporter and the leader fought a few words, and was finally fired.

A film reporter from the entertainment department of a newspaper published an article that caused widespread discussion on major ** platforms, and the title of the article was "In order to coax the big star Happy Newspaper Editor-in-Chief to fire me". And this big star is Xu Zheng, secondly, the reporter originally thought that the matter would come to an end, but it was brought up again at the regular meeting. A colleague questioned why other ** could directly quote the name of the movie, but we as direct interviewers couldn't, because the leader and the reporter argued again about this matter.

Finally, in mid-August, the journalist was suddenly told to leave his job voluntarily. The reporter himself felt very incomprehensible, and was dismissed just because the artist tampered with the manuscript when everyone felt that there was no problem with their article. Even before that, there were no warnings or warnings.

There is a dispute, which is related to the promotion of Xu Zheng's new film, and the two sides have not negotiated the details on some issues.

A newspaper reporter finally won Xu Zheng's exclusive report, but the subsequent development was not what he imagined. As a famous filmmaker, Xu Zheng has a certain degree of audience popularity and national popularity. And his journey has not been smooth sailing, because he is not an actor who takes the route of appearance, he has not had particularly outstanding roles and acting achievements from the beginning of his career, his basic skills are very solid, and his ability to figure out the role and the strength to study the script are still very strong, so he can also seize every opportunity that belongs to him.

After struggling in the TV industry for a while, he seized the right opportunity and turned to movies, and the movies he starred in or produced have a good reputation at the box office and word of mouth.

This incident was obviously a dispute between the reporter and his company, and Xu Zheng did not respond.

Xu Zheng did not respond, because the controversial incident involved his violation of industry rules at the beginning of the year, so it was more beneficial for him to remain silent and not respond.

Xu Zheng did not respond to this matter, because the reporter was fired mainly because of the decision made by his boss, and Xu Zheng's response at this time would only lead to burning.

Reason for the incident: A newspaper reporter asked Xu Zheng to do an exclusive interview, and made an appointment to mainly talk about the incident of "the theater film suddenly changed to a big network" at the beginning of the year, but the interview process was not smooth, Xu Zheng's team revised the outline many times, and revised it sentence by sentence after the interview draft came out, not only that, but when the deadline was about to arrive, he stepped up his request not to talk about the betrayal of the theater in the title and introduction, and even the title of "Embarrassing Mother" could not be mentioned.

Escalation of the conflict: At this time, it rose to the corporate conflict, and the reporter asked the leader on this matter, and the leader, as Xu Zheng's friend, complied with the modification according to the opinions of Xu Zheng's team, and told the reporter: "If he can accept your interview, he will already give you face", "Xu is my friend in WeChat, and he has also helped the newspaper a lot", "You have to focus on interpersonal relationships".

At this point, the incident has been temporarily resolved.

Follow-up: On the issue of this incident, the reporter and the leader conducted ** in many working meetings, and even quarreled, but after the quarrel, the reporter took the initiative to apologize to the leader privately for his problems and improper attitude in this incident, and after the leader accepted the apology, the two shook hands and made peace. I thought that this matter would end here, but what I didn't expect was that in August 2020, in a private conversation, the leader asked the reporter to take the initiative to leave before the end of the month, and the leader said that the reason was because the reporter brought huge trouble to the leader's management and even the entire team, affecting the working atmosphere of the entire group, and even endangering the jobs and future of the entire newspaper and everyone.

At the same time, the leader said that the reporter did not repent, and he had no choice but to issue an "eviction order" to "kill chickens and make an example of monkeys", otherwise anyone could make a mistake in front of him.

The reporter wrote a long article accusing him of losing his job because of the interview with Xu Zheng, and in this long article, the causes, processes, results, and follow-up of the entire incident and the attitudes of some people are all clear. Its purpose can be seen that on the one hand, it is to accuse Xu Zheng of making things difficult during the interview, and on the other hand, to accuse the newspaper leader, believing that the leader is suspected of workplace bullying.

The reporter explained in the article that he had interviewed Xu Zheng and that he had already been interviewed, but at the time of the deadline, Xu Zheng said that he did not want to publish some content, so his boss asked the reporter to delete it, but the reporter did not comply, so he lost his job.

"Embarrassing Mother" has received a wave of praise under the banner of free, gaining fame and fortune, but hurting the interests of the industry; The interview process was not smooth, and Xu Zheng's team repeatedly revised the draft; Instead of upholding justice, employees are forced to resign, etc.

A reporter lost his job because he wrote a long article complaining and interviewed Xu Zheng. A large part of the reason is because the reporter's nonsense has had a great impact on Xu Zheng.