Why are there so many people who stand on the moral high ground to accuse and judge others?

Because some people need to seek a sense of existence and identity on the Internet, but when they evaluate the things encountered by others, they often put themselves in the perspective of God, treat themselves more leniently, and be strict with others, so it is easy to criticize others.

1. Look for superiority.

Some people are not happy in real life, or they can't realize their own value, so they need to find some superiority on the Internet. When you see something bad happening to someone else, you can't be empathetic.

Or compassionately understanding the situation of others and only from God's point of view.

Look at others, and then start criticizing the incorrectness of others' choices, completely standing on the moral high ground, but ignoring that you are a bystander, but others are a fan of the authorities. Seek superiority in the process of criticizing others.

2. The psychology of an indifferent bystander.

Human beings are very prone to the phenomenon of "the authorities are confused, but the bystanders are clear". When you are in the position of a bystander, you will treat what others are doing with indifference. Because I am not a victim.

If you don't cut yourself with a knife, you won't feel pain, so you can stand on the moral high ground and blame others, enjoy the process of blaming others, and enjoy the feeling of being God's fingers. Some people's practices are not so much for the sake of maintaining public order and good morals.

It is better to say that it is to satisfy oneself with the pleasure of one's tongue for a while, and to carry forward one's own justice.

3. Blindly go with the flow.

When a person is in a crowd, it is easy to blindly follow the crowd. Sometimes some of the events exposed on the Internet are only one-sided, and should not be commented on until the full picture is known, but some people like to directly stand on the moral high ground to accuse and judge others, because such words will bring them traffic and opportunities to make money. Blindly following the crowd is to achieve the purpose of making your own profits.

We don't have to pay attention to the comments of such people, and wait for the truth to be revealed, and then it's not too late to criticize. In the crowd, it is difficult not to be part of the rabble, but try to stand tall and see far. <>

Because these people are relatively shallow, they only see the side of a person, and they don't see the front, they feel that they are particularly smart, and they feel that their status is relatively high, so there will be this kind of disrespectful behavior of others, and there is a problem with the three views.

Because these people don't know how to respect others, these people are generally insecure, and they can't meet the target standards, so they can only ask others in this way, which is a psychological problem.

Because these people feel that they are very high people, and they also feel that their concepts are very correct, and they feel that they have the ability to judge the lives of others, so such people appear.

Because these people are very idle, and these people always like to meddle in other people's lives, these people want to publish something on the Internet to get everyone's approval.

A person who stands on the moral high ground to criticize people is, on the one hand, a person who does not have as high moral cultivation as the commanding height, but only sticks to this moral high ground in order to flaunt himself or highlight himself. They only rely on the knowledge of some great moral principles to maintain his righteous incarnation. A person with moral cultivation will not casually stand on the "commanding heights" to criticize others, and people with moral cultivation are generally more low-key, more rational, and more objective in dealing with problems or contradictions because of their cultivation; A person with moral cultivation is generally more likely to understand others, and even if others accidentally behave immorally, he will forgive others.

On the other hand, people who stand on the moral high ground are generally "flashlights", holding flashlights that only shine on others and not on themselves. According to others, it is difficult for others to find a breakthrough at the moral level, and they always feel that something is wrong, but they don't know that something is wrong or don't know how to reciprocate; When you look at yourself, everything is a reason, and you push your moral responsibility cleanly. People who stand on the moral high ground do not care about the feelings of others, they only care about their own feelings, and they care about some of their own needs.

When it comes to this issue, you can dig deep into the history and culture of our country, what is morality? In fact, since ancient times, our country is a country that attaches great importance to etiquette, and there have been many famous educators in different historical periods, such as Lao Tzu, Confucius, Mencius, etc., and many excellent propagators of etiquette, who have influenced generations of people with their own ideas, so until now, we have continued the tradition left by our ancestors, such as respecting the old and loving the young, courtesy to others, etc., which shows that our people are imperceptibly influenced.

First of all, we have to look at this problem rationally, which has historical origins, because they have been strengthened by their previous educational concepts and forced others to change, in fact, they do not know whether this approach is right or wrong while accusing others. It's caused by getting stuck in your own habitual thinking. In other words, they are also ignorant.

There is no need to take this kind of problem seriously, but the times in which we live are different, and modern people are paying more and more attention to the freedom of human nature and are becoming more and more open-minded. If we lived in a past era, who would have realized that it was a mistake to stand on the moral high ground and point fingers at others?

For example, in ancient times, usually the death penalty criminals who were sentenced to death by the imperial court would let them go to the streets, accept the scolding of the masses and all kinds of inhumane denunciations, so when we lived in that era, who would realize that in fact, this is also a violation of other people's human rights?

Of course, living in contemporary times, for those who always stand on the moral high ground to accuse others, of course we have to correct, but there is no need to go online, we must classify them as a certain group of people to treat them differently, but with the changes of the times, the development of human beings, and the progress of society, they have not kept up with the pace of this great era, and their thinking concepts are still stuck in the past trend of thought.

I feel at the highest point of morality.

There is no problem in looking at the things themselves.

It is said that you should look at things from multiple angles.

The highest point of morality is also an angle.

This is the highest point of academics.

Looking at one plus one cannot prove that two are the same.

It's all a matter of perspective.

A lot of old sayings.

It's all from the perspective of the highest point.

Those who despise those who do not look at things from the highest point of view.

It's limited by an angle.

Or rather, it is limited by the subjective perspective.

Can't see anything else.

It is impossible to find out.

In fact, the highest point of morality.

It is also a way to see things.

There can be many angles to see a thing.

Restricted by any angle.

I can't understand this.

Morality is the way that people with high IQs use to restrain the behavior of low IQ businessmen and thus disenfranchise them, and people with high emotional intelligence tend to use morality to create a comfortable environment.

In fact, these people are still very common in life, and they are keyboard warriors on the Internet. It may be because of their own psychological problems.

Some people are just stronger, and then they feel good about themselves, and they feel that what they say and what they feel is right, and what they say is right.

It is the kind of person who is very conceited, he feels that what he says and asks and feels is correct, and he is like standing on the kind of high point and criticizing others and demanding others with his own standards.

Morality is used to restrain oneself, not to blame others. Be yourself and don't pay attention to others.

There is a quote in To Kill a Mockingbird: "You can never really get to know a person unless you walk around in their shoes and put yourself in their shoes". So many times, what we see is not the truth of the matter, and morality is used to discipline ourselves, not to blame others.

To be yourself well is to practice the best practice for yourself.

It's all self-righteous stuff, there's nothing to say, let him go si!

This kind of person has never seriously examined himself, and he just walks the world with one mouth.

Moral kidnapping, the moral yardstick is vague, and different people use morality differently. One group is desperately asserting a certain morality, and another group may feel that they have been "kidnapped".

Another characteristic of "moral kidnapping" is the infringement of rights in the private sphere by morality in the public sphere. Morality often requires people to cede certain rights, but this transfer must be voluntary and non-coercive. "Moral kidnapping" often violates rights in the name of morality, and is accompanied by labeling behavior, such as demanding what "young people" and "people with feelings" should be.

Moral claims should be based on the premise of respecting rights, and morality cannot be used to deprive a person of his rights, let alone use labels to force a person to give up his rights.

Moral kidnapping is the source of the station.

At the commanding heights of morality, it is necessary to restrain or regulate the behavior of others with the logic of morality.

Using morality as a bargaining chip, coercing individuals or others to do something. Generally, a group has low ideology and morality, and thinks that people with more resources must help people with fewer resources in order to achieve a psychological balance, and by the way, they also achieve their vanity of helping others.

Is the accusation of not standing on the moral high ground the accusation of standing on the moral low ground?

In fact, blaming and being blamed is not necessarily a bad thing. Society is always blaming and being blamed, scolding and being scolded is full of vitality and progress, but what is terrifying is the "pool of stagnant water" that dare not say anything.

Therefore, we don't care who the accuser is, what height he stands at, and what moral standards he uses to criticize others, because he, within the scope of the law, has the right to criticize and accuse others. Of course, under the premise of the law, you also have the right to refute and counter-criticize.

In the final analysis, it is still the question of how the criticized and accused face the criticism and accusation. Here, to borrow a sentence from the ancient sage: "Those who speak of my evil are also my teachers; Those who praise me beautifully, I also hate. ”

When you are accused of being groundless and maliciously, repeat this sentence several times, and your heart will naturally be at peace. This is commonly referred to as "slimming". To be able to stand on the moral high ground and accuse others is to brush up on one's own sense of existence.

I don't know that I am the worst one who hides in a corner. Evaluate yourself objectively, evaluate others objectively, learn from the best others, and be a better version of yourself. When you stay away from seeking truth from facts, have nothing to do, and criticize others with nonsense, please refrain from it.

It is the crow that falls on the pig and looks at others as black, but it does not see its own blackness, which is a manifestation of self-righteousness and selfishness. In fact, being a man should first examine himself, that is to say, he should be strict with himself and lenient with others, but now some people are strict with others and lenient with others, which leads to the root of this is material and money. They always think that they get less and others get more, even if they throw their big fish and meat into the garbage can, they still think that they are not full, and they have to have two or more sets to live in, and how many sets they have, let me say, they can't take anything.

Some people may say, keep it for your children and grandchildren! Do you see how the grandchildren dominate there? They may be useful for life, but there are also property that you have saved so hard overnight, and it will be lost overnight.

In my opinion, it is said that man is the most intelligent animal in nature, and I think that sometimes man is not as good as animals. I always think that I am amazing, but in fact, people are people.

I think the most important thing is that I haven't experienced the suffering of others, and then I keep blaming them for their faults. In fact, the ugly thing to say is that there is no empathy.

Because others don't know it's him when he speaks on the Internet, and then, it's not a big deal to watch the excitement, and if it didn't happen to him, he can't empathize.

Because these people always feel that everything they say is right and that they are not wrong, such people are the most selfish and self-righteous.

The reason why many people are accustomed to standing on the moral high ground to judge others is because many of us are unaware of a state on our network, and there is now a lot of information that can be provided to us on the Internet. <>

In fact, most of the people nowadays are actually lacking in quality, if we do not find the existence of such people in our daily life, we will find a lot of such people in the network, because in ordinary life, in the process of getting along with reality, we can not leave a bad impression on others, so we will have a very convergence for such a situation, and in the process of getting along with the daily reality, we will not deliberately expose the darkest side of our hearts. But when facing the screen of the mobile phone, it is actually like this, when we are in a busy work society all day, we may be very unconcerned about these things, and we have no time to pay attention to such things. But if you are not very busy during the day, when you see these news on the Internet, in fact, for many of us, you will show your ugliest side. <>

Standing on the highest point of one's own morality to judge others, not understanding one's own position, and not being aware of one's own reality, but only expressing all the thoughts about all this, and using the most vulgar language, even some language that we cannot understand. But in fact, everyone's personality in reality is actually different from the personality on the Internet, and many of us can see it. There may be a certain restraint in some of their usual lives, and they will not even show their other side, but this is not the case on the Internet, and a person who is usually particularly taciturn may also be an Internet troll on the Internet.