The digital camera Canon at home is good, or Sony, and that model, which is mainly for taking pictur

Secondly, tutu is here to help you recommend it, I personally think Canon's digital camera is better, our cameras and cameras are Canon's, and the cost performance is relatively high. (Nikon's is also OK, Sony's will be a little more expensive, and relatively speaking, the cost performance is not as high as Canon and Nikon).

If you will prefer a camera with a bright appearance, Canon ixus130 is recommended, and the pixel is also quite high in similar cameras (effective pixels14.1 million), wide angle, it's okay, 28mm, it's not low, optical zoom 4 times, higher than the s95, known as the king of cards, the important thing is that the current merchant ** may be less than 1400 pieces.

If the economy allows, it is still recommended ixus 210, compared with 130, the night scene effect of 210 is much better, the effect of daytime shooting, in fact, even if it is 8 million pixels, it is almost the same, mainly night scenes, but 210 will be more expensive than 130.

This is the price I recommend at about 1400,The two Canon cameras with relatively high cost performance are currently highly praised,Hehe,You can still go to the forum to see more reviews from netizens when you have time,Hehe,After all, buying a camera is not a small amount of money,Hehe,I wish you to buy your favorite camera。

Canon bar is professional after all. Sony is exempt, rewatching is useless. Nikon can also think about it.

You can take a look at Casio or Panasonic, both of which are more cost-effective.

Casio H15 Z2300 Panasonic FH22 ZS7

Sony is rotten in immature computing processors, and the quality of the processor affects high-sensitivity imaging and dynamic range, which leads back to Nikon, Canon, Pentax, etc.

Answer: In recent years, the development has been particularly fast, and Sony is obviously inferior to other manufacturers. So Sony provided a CMOS sensor to Nikon, but the camera performance was not as good as Nikon.

Some people say that Sony has a short time to make SLRs, and you don't mind me saying that Minolta, which I used to play for many years, is an optical giant, right? The A (Alpha) series is one of Minolta's AF camera series! Without Minolta's body and bayonet, Sony plays P SLR So if Minolta continues to develop, the A series should be no less than EOS and Nikon D!

But it still makes Sony rotten, because the processor developed by itself is "misleading" to say that the processor is useless is pure nonsense High sensitivity and high dynamics are highly dependent on the processor, and continuous shooting performance and focus judgment (speed) also rely on the processor's operation first Take Panasonic as an example, the powerful Venus processor (system) alone can be or decayed into magic, and the GF2 is the fastest focusing speed in the mirrorless, even more than many SLRs Original colors? Laugh at me, photographers will believe this? PS pull the line is good The big photographer took the money and talked nonsense there, don't listen to some blind followers

The camera is Canon's professional, and Sony's sleek look. Photography enthusiasts will choose Canon, and it is better to please girls or Sony.

If you're referring to home use, all three brands are available, and you just have to see which brand you like for the design! If you talk about professionalism, maybe Canon and Nikon are more professional, and there are more people who use them, and it is easy to communicate.

Canon's best, the best shots, but also the most durable, the least breakdown-free, the best quality.

The SLR is indeed Canon, but now we are talking about the card machine, and these two brands of cards are not good, but Sony's new EXMOR R is very good, at least very distinctive, like WX1, TX1, etc., definitely better than Canon's ixus at the same price.

Canon copy it Let's put it this way SLR semi-professional Canon fierce ordinary digital camera Personally, I think Samsung and Sony are okay Appearance and performance are almost the same Mainly look at the cost performance More than 3500 Canon and Nikon 3500 A simple photo is almost the same Look at the shape and battery Hehe A little non-professional opinion.

Everyone on earth knows that Canon is good.

When shooting Canon or Sony?