Is it better to choose a Canon A620 or a Canon A700 for a home digital camera?

A620, of course, if you pursue cost performance, 610 is also good. 1 The CCD is 1 of the A700 can not be compared, Canon's later products simply increased the pixels, and the size of the LCD was increased, but the size of the CCD was smaller, and the resolution of the LCD screen was not improved, or even lower. It's really going downhill Without considering the CCD size and LCD resolution pixels, it is meaningless to simply pursue high pixels and large viewfinder screens, and the density of photo pixels is too large, and the image quality is difficult to guarantee.

Personally, I don't think the A700 can be compared with the A620.

In addition, the macro of the A610 620 is very commendable, and the macro effect within 1 10cm is comparable to that of a DSLR. My current machine is A610.

If it were me, I would choose A700, one is that the optical zoom range is large, and the other is that the LCD screen is also large, one is cool to use, and the other is cool to watch.

As for the other parameters, there is no need to pursue them at all, and they cannot be distinguished.

Canon A620 and A700 have an advantage over Canon. A610 and A620 are more suitable.

The entry camera A6100 is good. The A6100 is positioned as an entry-level body, so the body is made of plastic, while the A6400 and A6600 are metal. In terms of body, all three cameras use a 24-megapixel APS-C sensor, and the focusing system is also 425 points, supporting 11fps continuous shooting, and even the 180-degree flip touch screen is the same.

Introduction

To summarize simply and crudely: A6100 is the A6400 with S-LOG and HLG removed and the viewfinder cut with a knife; A6600 is A6400 with headphone jack, five-axis image stabilization, and **eye control focus.

In terms of release information, the A6100 stand-alone ** is 5799 yuan, and the set with 16-50 lens ** is 6399 yuan, which will be on sale in late September. The unit price of A6600** is 10,599 yuan, and the set with 18-135 lenses** is 12,999 yuan. A6600** should exceed many people's expectations, but don't ignore the existence of A6400, it's quite cost-effective to buy it at this time.

Sony has come from behind with its strength in digital products, while Samsung has also made great achievements in digital cameras in recent years, but there is still a gap in its strength.

Among these cameras,First of all, Fujifilm A800 is not recommended,Although Fuji is very strong,And its CCD is self-developed Super CCD,But its imaging principle is equivalent to interpolation on the general computer,And Fujifilm camera is characterized by high ISO,The corresponding noise has increased,More importantly, it uses an XD card,This card is characterized by expensive,And the range of use is very small。

Sony's own Sony digital lens used in this camera, to be honest, the imaging effect is very average. Generally, people will choose a camera with a Zeiss lens instead of a camera with Sony's own lens, but this camera's ** is the cheapest and can be considered.

Samsung's camera uses Samsung's SHD lens produced with Schneider technology, which is relatively good, but there is still a big gap compared with authentic Schneider lenses or Leica and Zeiss, and Samsung has relatively little experience in digital cameras, so if you buy a Samsung camera, you should consider more.

Canon is the strongest, whether it is a film camera or a digital camera. This good A550 uses a Canon lens, although it is low-end, but the imaging is still *** (because the Canon lens is recognized as one of the good lenses), and the Canon has good operability, the imaging effect is very good, even beginners can take good photos.

To sum up, first line up Fujifilm, if you consider more ** factors, recommend Sony S650, Canon A550 is more expensive than Samsung S730, but all things considered, it is still a good camera with an optimal ratio.

1. A variety of lenses can be selected, but in the head of the factory, there are relatively few lenses in the A mount, and Sony's lenses are relatively expensive. The performance of the A580 is not much higher than that of the 600D.

Second, the feeling problem, different people have different feelings, and it is an entry machine, not to have higher requirements.

Third, the continuous shooting speed is indeed the A580 high!! But it's basically not needed! I really don't use it much! So, 600d is enough.

Therefore, it is recommended to choose 600d

Both the 600D and A580 are entry-level mid-range machines, and it's normal for them to have a strong plastic feel.

Both can be paired with their own under-door shots.

It doesn't make sense to simply compare the continuous shooting speed, just like you can compare the top speed of two cars.

My personal recommendation is canon. Because Sony's lens resources are small, and the surrounding accessories are expensive. It is easier to buy things from the C family, and it will be easier to upgrade them in the future.

In addition, you can consider 500D or 550D, which are more cost-effective than 600D.

According to the cost performance, A580 is much higher than 600D, with a lens factory lens as long as a mount can be used, A580's 15-point focus and 7 continuous shooting are fully overwhelming600D, on the feel of A580 body is larger than 600D, the feel is better, are Canon Nikon professional, the original camera ranking is Nikon first, Minolta second, Canon third, Canon has only come up in recent years, and now Minolta has been acquired by Sony, Sony's strong electronic technology plus the help of Minolta and Zeiss in Germany, Sony A series is already very powerful, non-Canon Nikon can be completely abandoned, and if you really want to talk about professionalism, then it is pure German Leica, which is better than the devil's Canon Nikon Sony, although Sony's lenses are not so much, but there are Zeiss and G lenses are very professional, ordinary lenses at home are enough, mobile phones play, hehe.

If you don't burn the lens in the back. My recommendation is A580....Best value for money.

Fast focusing. There are few so-called Sony lenses, but in fact, these lenses are enough for some people for a lifetime. And it doesn't necessarily need to be used, and it can be used.

This lens doesn't need to be tangled. And Sony's body is anti-shake. Looking at Canon's lens stabilization, there is no stabilization, ** is a world of difference.

Continuous shooting is still useful.

I bought the 600d and it feels good.

Continuous shooting canon is not comparable, depending on your needs.

The 600D rotating screen is better than the 580.

Canon has cheap lenses like small spittoons, Sony doesn't.

Although the body Sony seems to be a little kinder, if you don't have much money, the Sony lens will have to spend more than the Canon.

As long as you have money, Sony's lens is definitely strong, the 580 body is larger, and the grip is much better than Canon's low-end. You don't have to think about stabilization with a sub-head, but it's best to have a focus motor.

The home lens is used by Tallong, Tamron's is widely used, and the SLR is still better than Canon, which cannot be argued.

How small is the bonus for such a post?

Hello dear, Canon A95 and A620 are both digital cameras manufactured by Canon company, and they have their own advantages in different aspects. 1. First of all, the Canon A95 is an older camera with a 5-megapixel CCD sensor and a double-optical zoom lens. It has a small size and a lightweight design, making it suitable for carrying and travel use.

In addition, the A95 has a long battery life and a low **, making it suitable for beginners or those on a budget. 2, and the Canon A620 is a camera that will be pushed back to the mountains, with a 7-megapixel CCD sensor and a 4x optical zoom lens. Compared to the A95, the A620 has higher pixels and a larger zoom factor for sharper, more detailed shots**.

In addition, the A620 also has a rotatable LCD screen and more manual control options, which is suitable for users who have some knowledge and experience in photography. To sum up, if you're concerned about portability and **, the Canon A95 is a great choice. But if you're after higher pixels and more manual control options, as well as sharper quality, then the Canon A620 might be a better fit for you.

The final choice depends on your individual needs and budget.

I believe that many people are very fond of cameras now, people's living standards have improved, and they know how to enjoy life more. So I don't know how everyone preserves the beautiful scenery they encountered during the trip? Presumably, there will be more people who use cameras, and what I am going to talk about here is thisSony camera A6300 vs A6000 which is betterIf you also want to buy and miss you, then you might as well find out together.

First, the introduction of the big A6300 next to the Sony camera

Although it is a pity that they did not keep up with the specifications of the second-generation A7 series of 5-axis internal shockproofing, they have improved the 425-point phase focus point and the new gimmick 4D focusing system that is almost full of image sensors, and the body and adapter have been upgraded to a more robust metal material that is resistant to moisture and dust. Judging from the specifications and characteristics, the Sony A6300 is indeed a more complete model.

Second, the introduction of Sony camera A6000

The Sony A6000 is a new E-mount interchangeable-lens camera with a newly developed 24.3 million pixel Exmor?The apshdcmos sensor is designed with a seamless micro-lens design to enhance the light acquisition capability of the sensor** and edge sections. In terms of pixels, the Sony A6000 has reached the level of the previous Nex7.

In addition, the A6000 uses the latest ultra-high-speed hybrid focusing system, which can achieve the shortest focusing time in seconds, making it the fastest mirrorless camera available. With 179 focal points, it can cover the entire frame of the split cavity. Compared to the previous NEX6, which also uses a hybrid focusing system, it has also improved a lot in terms of focusing.

3. Which is better Sony camera A6300 vs A6000

Sony camera A6300 vs A6000 which is better, compared to the Sony camera A6300 is relatively better. Because Sony has put the focus of its camera products on full-frame mirrorless, the APS-C mirrorless series has a feeling that it seems to be set aside. But after all, we still saw at the beginning of this year that the Alpha thousand-digit high-end model, which has not been updated for nearly three years, has the successor A6300.

In terms of specs, this update is a big improvement on the A6000's previously regrettable shortcomings, including higher screen and viewfinder resolution, microphone radio, and details such as an electronic level.