A question about the paradoxical peculiarities of philosophical things

Updated on educate 2024-06-03
11 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    First of all, it is necessary to understand the concept of paradoxical particularity.

    The particularity of contradiction refers to the fact that the contradiction of concrete things and the aspects of each contradiction have their own characteristics (horizontal); The contradictions of each concrete thing and the aspects of each contradiction also have their own characteristics (longitudinal) at different stages of development.

    So you said it"The two sides of the contradiction of things also have their own characteristics"It was meant to be and later"Contradictory peculiarities"The meaning is interconnected.

    It means that there are many different aspects of any thing and show different characteristics.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    Contradictory things have a "contradictory" relationship, and the establishment of this relationship is found from their respective characteristics.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    This sentence involves two concepts.

    First, the particularity of the contradiction; Second, the difference and meaning of contradictory characteristics and commonalities, the meaning of the whole and the part.

    The definition of the particularity of contradictions, the contradictions of concrete things and the aspects of each contradiction have characteristics; The contradictions of various specific things and the different stages of the development of various aspects of the contradictions are also characteristic.

    The two sentences are understood in terms of "space" and "time" respectively. It's easy to grasp.

    Contradictory commonality is subordinate to individuality, right! It is commonality and individuality. This is a very difficult concept to understand.

    We understand it this way, commonality resides in individuality, individuality is restricted by commonality, and commonality and individuality transform each other under certain conditions"

    So the difference lies in the grasp of different sides of the problem.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Broadly speaking: contradiction is a modelling concept. If two things must exist when one does not exist, then there is a contradiction between the two things.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Contradictions, universality, special struggles, and their interrelationships and significance. 1. The two are different from each other, the relationship between the general and the individual, the absolute and the relative, and any general is only a part of many individuals, one side and the essence; Nothing can be fully included in the general; 2. The two are interconnected, the universal is in the particularity, and generally can only exist in the individual, the particularity includes the universality, and the particularity is related to the universality; 3. Universality and particularity can be transformed into each other under certain conditions. Theoretical implications:

    The relationship between commonality and individuality, between absolute and relative, is the essence of the problem of contradiction, and not understanding it is tantamount to abandoning dialectics. Practical significance: The building of socialism with Chinese characteristics should be guided by the universality of contradictions, that is, guided by Marxism-Leninism, adhere to the direction and road of socialism, and proceed from the particularity of contradictions, from the actual situation in China, and from the national conditions that China is in the initial stage of socialism and will be in the long space endurance period. It has promoted the all-round development of the cause of socialist construction.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    The particularity of contradiction refers to the fact that the contradictory thing and each of its aspects have their own characteristics. It is the philosophical basis for the concrete analysis of specific problems.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Principle of Contradictory Universality and Particularity:

    Clause. 1. The universality and particularity of contradictions are distinct from each other;

    Clause. Second, the universality and particularity of contradictions are interrelated, and the universality of contradictions resides in particularity, and particularity embodies universality.

    Clause. 3. The distinction between the universality and particularity of contradictions is relative, and under certain conditions, they can be transformed into dust tombs with each other.

    The principle of the dialectical relationship between the universality and particularity of contradictions is the philosophical basis for upholding the principle of integrating the universal truth of Marxism with concrete practice, and is of important guiding significance for building socialism with Chinese characteristics, and is the philosophical basis for China's policy of building socialism with Chinese characteristics.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    The philosophical basis of the principle of the universality and particularity of contradictions is dialectical materialism. Dialectical materialism holds that all things in the universe are born from contradictory movements and developments. Contradictions include universal contradictions and special contradictions.

    Universal contradictions refer to the contradictions that exist in all things, such as quality and quantity, stillness and motion, the essence and phenomena of things, etc. A particularity contradiction refers to a contradiction that has a special nature and manifestation in a particular thing. The universal contradiction is the basis and premise of the special contradiction, and the special contradiction is the concrete manifestation of the universal contradiction.

    Dialectical materialism emphasizes that the development of contradictions is a process of continuous progress and deepening, which not only follows universal laws, but also manifests itself in diversity and particularity, which is also the philosophical basis for the principle of the bridge between the universality and particularity of contradictions.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    1. The meaning of contradiction and its significance are as follows: contradiction is the unity of opposites. The identity of contradiction and the identity of struggle are inseparable from the same differences and opposites in the struggle.

    Struggle with residency and identity limitations. The contradiction between the two sides promotes the movement, change and development of things.

    Method: To look at this problem, we must look at the opposition, but also look at the unity, and we should combine the two.

    2. Universal: all contradictions are always contradictory conflicts.

    Method: Adherence to the premise of materialist dialectics by recognizing the universality of contradictions. Recognize the contradictions of contradictions, have the courage to expose contradictions, and use a comprehensive viewpoint to look at problems, and persist in two points of voice and two points to prevent one-sidedness.

    3. Major and minor contradictions.

    Common approach in primary and secondary schools: insist on dichotomy and focus on unifying the equilibrium theory against metaphysics.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Contradiction is a philosophical category that reflects the relationship between the unity of opposites within and between things.

    Contradiction, it reflects a special state of interaction between things, mutual shadows, "contradiction" is not a thing, nor an entity, it essentially belongs to the attribute relationship of things. This kind of attribute relationship is a special relationship between things, and this special relationship is "opposite", and it is precisely because of this "opposite" relationship between things that they can constitute contradictions.

    Broadly speaking, if two things must exist when one does not exist and the other must exist, then the two things are in contradiction. Contradiction is also known as "self-contradiction". It refers to the judgments made by the same subject (individual or collective) that contradict each other (cannot be the same true or false) or oppose each other (cannot be the same true but can be the same as false).

    The difference between the contradiction of logic and the contradiction of dialectics is as follows:

    1) The former is a manifestation of confusion in thought, while the latter is a reflection of the contradictions of objective things in thought.

    2) The former is the result of violating the rules of thinking, which is abnormal, and the latter is inherent in normal thinking.

    3) The former is an obstacle to the development of thinking, and the latter is the driving force for the development of thinking.

    4) The former can be ruled out, while the latter is unavoidable.

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    The premise and basis for distinguishing and understanding things is the particularity of contradictions.

    For the reason things are so different is that they each have their own special contradictions, which define the special nature of one thing from others.

    It's like trying to distinguish between good and bad apples, both of which are apples and pre-judging fruits, and both have the characteristics that apples should have, which is equivalent to the universality of contradictions, and it is impossible to distinguish according to this. So you have to look at their respective characteristics, from the shape, taste, etc., and that's the particularity of each of them. This particularity is the basis for you to distinguish between good and bad in your district, and the basis for understanding them.

    So why is the particularity of contradiction the basis for understanding things?

    When we analyze the peculiarities of the characteristics of apples, we are not understanding them at a deep level. Therefore, the process of analyzing the contradictions and particularities of things is the process of understanding things.

    Only by proceeding from reality and concretely analyzing the particularity of contradictions can we distinguish between things and understand the special laws governing the development of things. Without the concrete analysis of the particularity of contradictions, it is impossible to distinguish between things, and it is impossible to understand things correctly.

    It is recommended to ask the teacher more after class, he will be more systematic and will take care of your actual situation, which is also special. Contradictions are everywhere, hehe.

    Just be satisfied, it should be very specific and popular.

Related questions
8 answers2024-06-03

In fact, Heidegger and Gadmore already have this question, and the levels are not two, but in one plane, that is, in the middle. The two are accompanied, that is, the formulation of language necessarily presupposes the existence of grammar, and the formulation of grammar necessarily presupposes the existence of language, so the answer to the question is already resolved at the time the question is raised. Not everything is a platonic retreat.

4 answers2024-06-03

Yes! Huang Lao Palace is a building dedicated to Huang Lao Immortal.

13 answers2024-06-03

Everyone's menopause is different. Some women have symptoms of menopause in their thirties. See if your mother has frequent headaches, inexplicable tantrums, suddenly becomes scolding, or emotional symptoms, if not, it should not be menopause, maybe she has something troublesome, you can tell your mom about your dad or your mom's sisters, let them enlighten your mom, you can also enlighten your mom. >>>More

14 answers2024-06-03

I hope the methods I know by heart can help you.

If you understand the reasons for the formation of westerly winds in the northern hemisphere, then the same is true in the southern hemisphere. >>>More

7 answers2024-06-03

Counter-attacking is Italy's constant tactic, Nesta has world-class ability but too many injuries, Cannavaro is not tall but has a good header and tackles, Maldini was really good when he was young, and most of the accolades were achieved at the club. If it weren't for Buffon, Italy wouldn't have won the title in '06. If these people can form a line of defense, it is really a concrete line of defense.