Ask a philosophical question, and learn it 5

In fact, Heidegger and Gadmore already have this question, and the levels are not two, but in one plane, that is, in the middle. The two are accompanied, that is, the formulation of language necessarily presupposes the existence of grammar, and the formulation of grammar necessarily presupposes the existence of language, so the answer to the question is already resolved at the time the question is raised. Not everything is a platonic retreat.

Example: The subject is the object of the predicate statement This sentence is both a grammatical description and a sentence at the same time.

Think of him as a sentence, and the grammatical description is that the subject is "subject", the predicate is "is", the object is "object", and the definite is "predicate stated".

I don't know if that's what you mean.

It is still a Chinese description that conforms to Chinese grammar. This is a practical theory, that is, this grammar is summarized from people's practical life operations. There are also pure theories, that is, some crude image theory researchers, thinking about the possible laws of certain phenomena, and then confirming them in real life, may not be able to confirm them, such as the big ** theory of the formation of the universe.

Personal reflection.

Before Chinese grammar existed, it was a habit of using words, and when it appeared, all Chinese descriptions, including the description of grammar, were in Chinese and the grammar of the time.

It's like when a person preaches good deeds, he himself does good deeds.

This is a paradox, as Russell said, if a person cuts the hair of a person who can't cut his own hair, then can he cut his own hair, a reason, my view on this issue is the same as Tuski, that is, the two are layered, and the hierarchical institutions of the two are different.

You're not just a matter of cause and effect. In addition, the concept of Chinese is still described in Chinese. The conclusion is that opposites are cause and effect of each other.

Hume (1711-1776) – idealism, empiricism, instrumentalism, nihilism.

Berkeley (1685-1753) – Idealism Associationism in empiricism.

Immanuel Kant (1724-1804).

Fichte (1762-1814) Idealism.

Hegel (1770-1831), an idealist who was a Hegelian, was a Hegelian among the leading academic philosophers in the United States and England. Outside the realm of pure philosophy, there were many Protestant theologians who also taught his doctrines, and his philosophy of history had a profound influence on political theory. As we all know, Marx was a follower of Hegel in his youth, and he retained a number of important Hegelian characteristics in his completed system of doctrines.

Hume, who believed that knowledge could only be derived from the observation of events—from "impressions of the senses" or "databases of sensations", was the author of a treatise on human nature (1739-1740), an inquiry into human understanding (1748), an inquiry into moral principles (1752), and a natural history of religion (1757). Together with John Locke and George Berkeley, he is known as the three great British empiricists.