What are the pros and cons of my article?

Sample essay on the advantages and disadvantages of self-evaluation [1].

Pros:

1. I am enthusiastic and cheerful, friendly, honest and humble. Diligent, conscientious and responsible, able to bear hardships and stand hard work, conscientious and patient. Affable, approachable, and good at communicating with people.

2. I have a cheerful personality, integrity, honesty and stability. Work conscientiously and steadfastly, have a strong sense of responsibility, be good at independent thinking, analyze problems, and solve problems. Have a strong sense of collective honor, strong social adaptability, and good team spirit.

Able to bear hardships and stand hard work, willing to try various challenges.

3. Strong self-learning ability, good at thinking, hard-working, and good. Communication skills, good at getting along with others, team player, love sports. However, people are not perfect, and they still have certain deficiencies in some aspects, such as knowledge, social experience, etc.; However, I believe that these can be improved through my own hard work, and I am working in this direction!

Cons:

1. I am more rigid in my work, and sometimes I am easy to be more serious with people. Although this is a disadvantage, it shows that you are more compliant with the established work norms of the unit and have a certain principle;

2. I want to learn any knowledge or major, but I haven't learned anything. Although this is a disadvantage, it shows that you love to learn and have a wide range of knowledge;

3. I am prone to disagree with people or things that I think are wrong, which leads to often offending people. Although this is a shortcoming, it shows that you are more assertive and principled;

4. I'm not very good at communicating too much, especially when it comes to interacting with strangers. Although this is a disadvantage, it shows that you are cautious in making friends;

5. I am in a hurry, and the accuracy is sometimes not enough. This is a disadvantage, but it means that you can get the job done faster.

Self-evaluation of personal strengths and weaknesses

Pros:

1. Respect teachers, unite classmates, be helpful, be a good helper of teachers, good friends of classmates, study diligently, work hard, like to discuss and solve problems with classmates, and participate in various extracurricular and extracurricular activities organized by the class and school.

2. Helpful, good at unity, hard-working, approachable.

3. Have perseverance and perseverance in doing things, and have your own opinions on things, rather than others.

Cons:

1. The thinking is not mature enough, and the potential of linking theory with practice is weak.

2. The work style is too restrained and not bold enough.

3. Theoretical study needs to be further deepened.

Generally, the aspects that can be evaluated include: whether the idea is novel, whether the structure is complete, whether the hierarchy is clear, whether the language expression is accurate, whether the point of view is reasonable, whether the conclusion is correct, etc.

We need to evaluate the overall structure and content of **.

In this way, we can better evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of a **.

Evaluations need to be more comprehensive and objective.

The pros and cons of the evaluation** are as follows:

1. The topic is relatively novel and the perspective is relatively unique, which reflects the solid foundation of a certain theory, especially the article can be combined with relevant cases for argumentation and analysis, which has certain practical value.

After the review of **, it can be seen that the author has spent a lot of effort on the collection of data and cases, and can also put forward some more profound views, but there are still certain deficiencies in the depth of the theory and the citation of some arguments. Overall, this is a passable article.

2. The research content is realistic and operable. The topic is selected as a hot social issue, and the logical structure is rigorous. The views are clearly expressed and the arguments are comprehensive.

The language is plain and concise, and easy to understand. In the process of argumentation, it can also better combine the principles of professional knowledge with practical problems. But the arguments are not enough.

Generally meet the graduation requirements**.

3. The topic selection is more contemporary and realistic. The structure of the full text is reasonable. The expression of opinions is basically accurate. The content of the full text is closely related to the administrative management profession.

It is required to be written, which fully reflects the characteristics of the administrative management profession. There is a lot of relevant information to consult. But the main disadvantage is that there are not many things that belong to their own innovation. Generally meet the graduation requirements**.

4. In the entire graduation project, the student can successfully complete the writing under the strict requirements of the teacher. The structure is complete, and each part basically meets the writing specifications. In order to write this ** author, he obviously consulted a lot of information, and the discussion was relatively sufficient, and the organization was also very clear.

Of course, there are some deficiencies and areas that need to be improved. For example, the knowledge is not broad enough to actively communicate with the teacher about the progress of the work. It is hoped that the student will pay attention to these issues in his future work or study and strive for greater improvement and progress.

5. The content of ** question is basically consistent with **, the structure is basically complete, the language is relatively smooth, and there are no major grammatical errors. The problem is that there are too many parts quoted in the full text, too little analysis of one's own, and some "analysis" has traces of plagiarism. It should be said that the materials required to complete this article are already available, and the author can analyze and summarize the materials on this basis to draw his own conclusions.

First, it can be worded in terms of whether it is rigorous and whether it has a point of view.

Second, it can be based on whether the arguments are complete, whether the arguments are insufficient, and whether the arguments are far-fetched.

Third, it can be repetitive, that is, whether there is one's own point of view and whether there is plagiarism.

Fourth, from the perspective of the professional field, whether the discussion points and discourse options are too large or too small, and whether there are no examples.

Thank you for reading.

A good ** should first be able to solve an unsolved problem, the topic should be novel, and it should be supported by data.

Content, Topic, References, Word Count, Data and Facts Support, Format, Ideas and Logic, Novelty, Whether or Not a Problem Solves.