Was there an offside 40 in the Netherlands goal last night

First of all, the offside rule:

1.An attacking player is in an offside position if the ball is closer to the opponent's goal line. Excepts are the following:

a.The player is in his own half.

b.At least two opposing players are closer to the opponent's goal line than that player.

2.When a player kicks or touches the ball and a player of the same team is in an offside position, the referee deems that the player has committed any of the following acts, and the player shall be judged offside:

a.is interfering with a match or interfering with an opponent;

b.Attempt to gain advantage from an offside position.

3.A player shall not be judged offside if:

a.The player was only in an offside position;

b.A player receives a goal kick, corner kick or throw-in directly.

4.If a player is awarded offside, the referee shall award an indirect free kick to the opposing player in the offside position. If the player is offside in the opponent's goal area, the free kick may be taken anywhere in the goal area at the time of offside.

As can be seen from the first one, if Van Persie touches the ball, he must be offside.

As can be seen from the second clause a, Sneijder's shot flew past Van Persie's leg in an offside position, and Van Persie interfered with the opponent's goalkeeper's judgment of the ball, so it should be considered offside.

So, whether Van Persie touches the ball or not, the ball is offside!

There are a lot of weird games and weird penalties in this World Cup, and it is unknown whether it is the level of the referee or the influence of certain forces!

Anyway, football has long been impure!

Beat you up, it's really troublesome.

It should be forgotten, because Van Persie has already interfered with the view of the opposing goalkeeper. Van Persie is definitely offside, so it is not time to discuss whether Van Persie touched the ball or not, but whether he interfered with the opposing goalkeeper.

Touched the ball, absolutely offside Stare at how many replays.

Do the task, I 3q

Judging by the regular rules, the ball is offside!

Although Van Persie did not touch the ball after Sneijder shot the ball, Van Persie's action interfered with the opponent's goalkeeper and was in an offside position!

As long as you get the benefit in the offside position, whether you touch the ball or not, it is an offside ball!

It is indeed offside, whether it is touched or not, it is considered offside, and it is calculated whether it is profitable. Van Persie interfered with the goalkeeper's judgment.

If there is an offside position, the Netherlands can also enter, which is really unreasonable, and Uruguay should beat the Netherlands to avenge my Brazil.

Is the ball offside? The European Championship refereeing committee replied that it was "100 per cent offside", and spokesman Kapoor said: "According to the rules, when one of the last two defenders of the opposing team on the attacking side leaves the field, it is not offside.

In fact, there is a case to be learned, as in Chelsea's 3-2 win over Wigan Athletic last season, Bollarousse fell off the line in a duel for the ball to be deflected in front of goal, a player in front of goal who was in the position of Chelsea's last defender (Cech) to deflice the goal, and there was not much controversy on the Chelsea side at the time when the goal was valid.

Liu Jianhong asked the expert at halftime, and he said that it was not offside, and it was definitely not offside.

I just watched the world's football two days ago, and Lu Jun also said the same problem.

If the attacking player is offside, he can run out of the sideline or the baseline to show that he is not involved in the attack and has not interfered with the attack or anything.

Defenders are not, and players are never allowed to leave the field without the approval of the referee of the match. Panucci's departure was sudden, without the referee's approval. Leaving the field without the referee's approval is not accepted, which means that even if you leave the field, you will be considered the last defender of the defending team.

Therefore, Panucci's appearance made it impossible for the Dutch team to be offside in this attack, as all the players were behind Panucci.

There was no offside, there was a defender who was still next to the goal and didn't come back, and most people didn't see it, so it wasn't offside.

1. The concept of offside position (1) In the game, when a player is in the following situations, the player is in an offside position: 1. In the opponent's half. 2. Closer to the opponent's goal line than the ball.

3. Between the player and the opponent's goal line, there are less than two opposing players. If any of the above three conditions are missing, the player is not in an offside position. (2) If a player of the attacking team is in a position parallel to the ball, or a player of the attacking team is in a position parallel to the second-to-last player of the opponent, the player is not in an offside position.

3) The time to determine whether a player is in an offside position is the moment a player of the same team kicks or touches the ball, not the moment when the player receives the ball. 2. Offside foul A player in an offside position is awarded an offside foul only when the referee believes that he or she is "involved" in a real game at the moment when a player on the same team kicks or touches the ball: (1) interfering with the game; (2) interfering with opposing players; (3) Take advantage of the offside position.

"Real play" is not a region-wide quantitative concept, but refers to the actions and effects of a player in an offside position (any of the three above). Position is the premise, the moment of touching the ball is the timing of the judgment, and the behavior and effect are the basis for constituting an offside foul. 3. It is not an offside foul A player in an offside position is not an offside foul when he directly receives a goal kick, throw-in or corner kick from a player of the same team 1. The concept of offside position (1) In the game, when the player is under the game.

It's offside! Van Persie was in an offside position, he was on the same path as the ball, and he clearly disrupted the goalkeeper's judgment in this case, which was offside.

Of course, it was offside, although Van Persie did not touch the ball, but he interfered with the normal judgment of the goalkeeper in the path of the ball.

I felt it was offside because my team-mate was in a good position and blocked the goalkeeper and it helped a lot to score goals.

If it is not a sporting act for the defending player to be offside by withdrawing from the field, the referee shall not only not award the attacking player as offside, but shall instead give the defending player a warning when the ball is dead.

So no offside

Offside because the Italian player was off the field, not on the field.

Not Panucci, but Vanney's.

In the offside position.

There will be extra time, because the third goal of the Netherlands was scored while the Uruguayan players were not slowing down.

o(∩_o~

LZ football can't be assumed

Anything can happen

But if I think it's going to be overtime

I saw that it was offside, half a hand and he consciously joined the attack, it should be offside!

There is the problem of blocking the view of the goalkeeper, offside.

Whether it's offside or not, the score doesn't change.

Personally, I don't think it's offside.

It's hard to say, I think it can be dismissed, it's very similar to the offside goal when France and Mexico were played.

The shoulders are offside, and the linesman's eyes are very tricky!

Personally, I don't think it's offside.

You're right, there shouldn't be offside, because the defender's foot is over!

Only the shoulder is offside, but it's offside, but it's a pity.