According to the law of the jungle, is it better to be aligned or not to be aligned in relations bet

The law of the jungle is the survival of the fittest, and from the perspective of the law of the jungle, the relationship between countries is best if it is not aligned. Eliminate some economically weak countries.

The law of the jungle, the survival of the fittest, the survival of the strong, so the alliance between countries must be beneficial to both sides, and they all need to rely on each other to survive, and the advantages and disadvantages cannot be judged whether they are good or bad.

Personally, I think that for the current era, all countries should be closely linked and belong to the state of affecting the whole body, so it is naturally better not to engage in too many alliances.

First of all, the law of the jungle is the law of natural selection, survival of the fittest, survival of the fittest, and the law of the jungle in nature. I think it's better to form an alliance.

Obviously, it is very uncomfortable to be suppressed by the leader, so the weak will often resort to the method of alliance to make themselves better.

When Mongolia was just unified, due to its strength and loneliness, it was humiliated and oppressed by the Jin State, so Genghis Khan set the strategy of joining the Song Dynasty to attack Jin, and the alliance with the Song Dynasty benefited the Mongolian State a lot, not only suppressing the arrogance of the Jin, but also making himself stronger.

Economist Zhong Pengrong's article "The "Puppy Economy" Has Advantages" also shows very well that when you are not strong enough to confront a strong opponent, it is wise and wise to take an alliance. In the article, he first cited a scene that often occurs in the African savannah: several small wolf dogs, one responsible for harassing, one responsible for driving, and one responsible for pounce, can actually eat a large zebra.

Then he concluded: "The secret of three puppies eating a big zebra is a clear division of labor and close cooperation. It is precisely because we have a clear division of labor, perform their own duties, and never waver, that the advantages of the division of labor and the energy of cooperation have been generated.

In economic work, many economic activities are also accomplished in this way of division of labor and cooperation. I call this economic activity the puppy economy. ”

In Wenzhou's economic development, there are many such "puppy economies". For example, most of the shoes in Wenzhou are not produced by one company, but by many manufacturers related to shoes - the production of soles, the production of uppers, and the gluing, and they cooperate to produce finished shoes. These manufacturers, with any "puppy" alone, will not be able to monopolize the market because they do not have sufficient financial strength and technical advantages, but after such a union, the "puppy economy" has the advantage of fighting against the "big zebra", which is why Wenzhou's economy is so active.

However, while cooperation can be effective, it must not lose its mind.