Are Nike and Adidas running shoes really much worse than the Big Four?

Updated on physical education 2024-06-16
25 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-12

    No. The four major running shoes, except for ASICS and New Balance, have a certain reputation in China, and the other two brands are generally only known to friends who are more enthusiastic about running. Nike and Adidaas still dominate the running shoe market.

    The vast majority of friends still choose Nike and Adidas' running shoes.

    If the shoes of the four major brands are so good, why are not many people buying them? Because the product lines of Nike and Adidas are more abundant, more comprehensive, and more applicable. Nike and Adidas have a very rich product line, from daily travel to professional running shoes, the span is very large.

    People who can meet a variety of needs.

    The vast majority of consumers are not professional athletes, so when buying running shoes, they are more concerned about the comfort and appearance of the shoes rather than the performance of the shoes. Therefore, Nike and Adidas, which have better designs, higher appearance, and richer styles, are naturally more popular with consumers.

    The main products of the four major brands are professional running shoes, which are highly professional, and all the designs are designed to better meet the needs of athletes. Therefore, in terms of professionalism, there is no doubt that the four major brands have studied running shoes more thoroughly. But that doesn't mean that the shoes of the big four brands are better than Nike and Adidas.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    Yes. Nike and adidas running shoes with good performance are too expensive; Cheap running shoes are too poor in performance.

    If you've walked through things like Brooks' Glycerin, ASICS' Nimbus, and Saucony's Triumph, you'll probably agree with that. These professional running shoes perform well in all aspects, and they are really not comparable to adidas and Nike's running shoes in the same price range.

    Most people on the street only see Nike and Adidas stores and think they are good, but in fact, most of them are crowded. But if my friends run through ASICS, Saucony, Brooks, and Mizuno running shoes, they will basically not wear Nike Adidas when they run in the future.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    It's not much worse, New Balance, Saucony, Brooks and ASICS are collectively known as the world's top four running shoes. The shoes of these four brands either have aerospace-grade super technology or extraordinary comfort. For them, it seems that making the impossible possible is their norm.

    In the domestic market, Brooks and Saucony don't seem to have much visibility other than New Balance and ASICS. Except for some sports enthusiasts, few people know the two brands in the back.

    In the global market, Nike Adi still maintains the first and second positions, and it has been in this state for a long time. When most of my friends choose sneakers, most of them will also consider the products of these two companies.

    For example, in China, you can find a lot of Nike Adi on the street, but Brooks is almost invisible. The four major running shoes are excellent, but not many people buy them.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    Are the shoes good on the feet Wear more and try more to know Like ASICS is famous, I went to try more than a thousand top series That foot feeling is not a little worse than Nike React and Adi's UB.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Although I am a fan of NB, several pairs, but I have to say that the comfort of ASICS's shoes is really good, Adidas Nike is now not as good as the first two brands at the same price, I don't know if I haven't bought the high-end series, I just used to be good to wear and not very sporty, there are more than 40 pairs of shoes like that ASICS the most, it took 6 years to wear it, it was highly recommended!

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Now there are still people who think that the four major running shoes are competitive in terms of professional running shoes? Nike Alphafly has made Kipchoge break two for all to see, A gel is too heavy, how many years of no technological innovation, N B S are casual shoes, professional running shoes Nike first, the second is Xtep can not be ASICS.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Don't blow the so-called four big running shoes, being beaten by Adidas and Nike, isn't it a level? Adidas has top-of-the-line boost technology, Nike has MAX cushions, and React Zoom technology Just look at what running shoes the champions of the major top competitions wear now.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Those who know the industry will feel that the difference is relatively large, after all, the main direction is different; But the difference between ordinary people and the perception is not particularly big.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    All I know is that the Nike and Adibi running shoes are going to be a little bit smaller (wow

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Yes, it's a lot worse, running shoes cushioning has both rebound, Adi's boost and Nike's zoomx carbon plate technology are really the so-called big ones.

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    The four major running shoes are not going on, they are the talk of the Chinese people, Adi is self-contained, Nike is long, except for the left moon landing series.

  12. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    There is usually no gap, and there is no obstacle to light running, but the difference above moderate will come out! There are so many people in the world who love i, whether you like to listen to it or not, but if you don't run, then it doesn't matter what you buy, which one you think looks good and which likes what you buy! Adinike also has a very small selection of shoes, which are pretty good, and I mean from the running shoe field.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    In fact, there is a gap, but it is only a minimal, if the gap is too big, there must be one will not become an international brand, since both are big brands, then each family has the good and bad of each family, for and Putian, the shoes produced are almost the same, friends who are interested in buying can +v thank you.

    moshanghuajy666

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    Vary. Personally, I feel the most suitable for the UB of Adidas at the moment.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    No, they are all well-known shoes, almost.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    In fact, Nike Adi is much stronger than the Big 4, in previous years, the marathon record setters wore Adi Adizero, and in recent years, the marathon record has been held by Nike Next4%. By the way, the Puma ...... that Lightning Bolt wears

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    There is a difference, there is not much difference, how to say, the slight difference, as if one is a professional running shoe, the other is a casual running shoe, just like ordinary running shoes are suitable for the public, and professional athletes wear professional running shoes.

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    The saying of the four major running shoes, I don't know which ** forcibly organized! In terms of sole technology, they are not at all on the same level as Nike Adi....Take a look at what the Olympic athletes wear, the four major running shoes are the best people, that is, the so-called high cost performance to occupy the market, Nike Adi's high-end running shoes are very expensive. And it doesn't always have to be grabbed.

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    It's not much worse, in fact, the feeling is the same at the same price.

  20. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    Nike is good at wearing air cushions, which are more comfortable to wear than Adi's, and the shock absorption effect is also better.

  21. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    Nike is technically better than AD. You choose the air, cushioning, cushioning. The net gauge is lightweight and breathable.

    Just look at the athletes on the field, you can see that there are many people who wear Nike, and I don't seem to have seen AD, except for football. AD's running shoes also have the same function as Nike, but they are still relatively good with Nike. You'll know if you try.

  22. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    Nike's technology is better, Adi's mountain running shoes are good, and Nike's grade is higher than Adi's.

  23. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    The most important thing to buy shoes is to buy the one that suits your feet, and it must be comfortable first, but *** is still very important.

    How to put it, both have their own characteristics:

    Both Nike and Adidas are world-class sports brands.

    Nike's main focus is to make blue sneakers, and has also designed shoes for various NBA stars, Nike's characteristic is that it has its own unique shoe-making technology, and the design of "air cushion" shoes is light and durable, especially the sole is very wear-resistant, and special treatment is carried out in places where wear is severe, and it is very comfortable to wear.

    adidas is famous for manufacturing running shoes, and also has its own unique shoe-making technology "spacer" to make the wearer very relaxed, stereotyped, and not out of position, especially when running, it can be clearly found, and in the history of shoemaking earlier than Nike.

    Why is Nike's fame so big now, the key is that there are many advertisements, in order to grab the status of Nike's advertisements can be seen in **, and the quality of shoes is also very well recognized by many buyers.

    adidas will be a little more low-key, not so much advertising, but there are still a lot of people who buy it, some like 3 pieces, and some people who like 3 leaf clovers with different hobbies have their own unique choices.

    To sum it up, depending on what type of shoes you buy, blue sneakers, running shoes or tennis shoes, Nike for blue sneakers, and adidas for running shoes

    Tennis shoes are commonly known as "cricket shoes", and I personally think that adidas is inferior to NIEK

  24. Anonymous users2024-01-20

    Nike is very collectible in terms of shoes, but Adi's retro clover series I think is very trendy, has been very popular, in terms of clothes, Adi's new designer designed clothes I think are very good and Y-3 have a fight.

    Even more generous, but also more appropriate.

  25. Anonymous users2024-01-19

    Each has its own characteristics, depending on what style you like.

Related questions
9 answers2024-06-16

Both companies have their own strengths, such as in football, ADI is the boss, and track and field Nike is better, but overall NIKE is better than ADI, especially in terms of comfort.

11 answers2024-06-16

See if you like player shoes and also ordinary basketball shoes! >>>More

10 answers2024-06-16

The Nike Dunk was actually meant to be a pair of basketball shoes that fit well to the ground. For Nike, the Dunk, which has a simple design and low technical content, is definitely a pair of cross-century shoes. >>>More

26 answers2024-06-16

The MAX air cushion has a high capacity and strong air pressure, and in basketball shoes, it is mostly used on the inside because it can provide excellent shock absorption. Not suitable for players with light weight. >>>More

10 answers2024-06-16

Landlord... To correct a mistake first, if it is "contained", then the subset comes first... "Contain" is a subset at the end. >>>More