Nike and AD shoes Which shoes are taller

The MAX air cushion has a high capacity and strong air pressure, and in basketball shoes, it is mostly used on the inside because it can provide excellent shock absorption. Not suitable for players with light weight.

Air Max is very tall, but it is not suitable for small weights and will be very hard.

There's also the Nike Shox, which is tall enough and hard enough

Try it more After all, shoes are not only soles, but also the appearance and color are very important, and the most important thing is comfort!

If you don't wear it for playing, then you can wear shox and max, and don't wear it for high play.

In fact, it's good to buy a thick insole Many artists use it, ha

The air cushion is not much higher, it's useless, tell you to wear AD's A3 series or Nike's SHOX series, it's a lot higher, you can go to the Internet to check **, it's definitely much higher than the air cushion.

There are 2 pictures here, one is Garnett's, which is A3's.

There are also dual-cart ones, which are the shox series.

It's all about the same, because the technology is similar, and it's taller than shoes with A3 shock absorbing technology.

Nike's air cushion feels a little better.

It should be about the same, but I personally think Nike looks better.

Nike is high. I buy shoes, Adi buys tennis.

n Nike's. Buy one with an air column.

max is very high.

Running shoes like the MAX90 180 360

Basketball shoes like AF25

Yes? Is 176 still too short? You dream of being a model, right? Hmmm......Since you want to wear a cushion, then I don't mind that you don't have to listen to other people's recommendations, you can go to the store to choose, or there are better, higher, and there are not only two that sell cushion shoes!!

nike af1

The Air Max 90 is also quite tall.

AJ 3 4 5 (can also be used as a shoe to press the road) adidas forum height is about the same as af1.

AF1 or basketball shoes are quite tall.

Any high-top shoes can be bought with a pair of inner boosters.

In the case of basketball shoes, it is AD and Nike. In terms of quality, AD's soles are more wear-resistant than Nike's, but Nike's shoes have stronger high-tech content than AD's, and the style is better than AD's If you just buy AD for playing ball, there is nothing to think about, if you still wear it for what you usually go shopping, it is recommended to buy Nike. Personally, I still prefer Nike...

Look, the casual Adi is more comfortable, and the sports aspect of Nike is more advantageous because his designers are more avant-garde All are good I hope you are satisfied.

The difference is not much, the key depends on what type you wear, basketball shoes are comfortable with Nike, cricket shoes are comfortable with Adi, canvas shoes and vulcanized shoes are of course comfortable with Converse, in short, it depends on what type you like.

Actually, talk about their quality.

It should not be compared.

With the same reputation, the same standards.

Comparing their quality may not be very good.

AD and NK myself think it's a comparison of feeling and shape.

NK's shoes are generally good-looking.

AD's shoes are generally comfortable to wear.

Further, it means that AD has good practicability.

NK has good aesthetics.

Nike's Shox Max Zoom is not wear-resistant, and it is recommended that you use and1 to play outdoors.

Of course, ad***, nike has nothing to show for it.

There are *** and poor ones, but most of them are of good quality

It's just that some new colors have come out, and the style hasn't changed too much.

Compared with NIKE and AD, AD's football shoes are better and the overall feature is durability, Nike's basketball shoes are better, but the star shoes are not durable.

Nike's shoes are the best sneakers in the world, Nike is still the boss until now, and of course, Adi is also quite good.

Personally, I feel that Adi's quality is better, but the comfort is not as good as Nike.

Personally, I like Converse and then Adidas.

It's definitely the king of zoom bb outfield, I've been wearing it for more than 1 year, it's still new, and it's very comfortable to wear, and the startup response is super fast.

Or Adi's TS series, my classmates have worn it, it's not bad, it's very strong.

I would like to recommend you a few pairs of good shoes in the outfield.

Zoom 20-5-5, James' team model, 20-5-5 is James' average per game in his rookie season. Equipped with all of Nike's top technologies except carbon plates, Zoom, and super cushioning! Good grip and a hard-wearing outsole that is rare in Nike!

An absolute outfield weapon!

The 2K4, like the 20-5-5, is also a great shoe with a high cost performance in the Nike series! The only drawback may be that it is not breathable. Wear-resistant, comfortable, good protection are its characteristics.

t-mac1,2,3。Maddie's first three pairs of signature shoes! Every pair is a good shoe for the outfield! A combination of wear-resistant, comfortable and good wrapping in one of the best outfield products!

The ProModel series, AD's mid-range shoe, is not at a high price, but has outstanding performance!

Try not to use good shoes in the big cement area, and if you must use them, the new Nowitzki one this year is not bad.

I don't think the star signature shoes are too much.

That kind of training shoes are good.