Etiquette collapse is actually a kind of progress, why do you say that?

In textbooks, "etiquette collapses and happiness is bad" just means the progress of the social system. If we were to vote for China's most representative cultural celebrity for thousands of years, there is no doubt that the winner would be Confucius, the "holy teacher" of the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period.

Confucius and his Confucianism.

Doctrine has profoundly changed the development and evolution of Chinese culture over the past millennia. He said that compared with the three dynasties in the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period, it was "the collapse of etiquette and happiness", so the Confucian disciples should "rise and fall", restore the Zhou rites, and fight against the status quo; But some people say that the collapse of etiquette is just the sign of progress. Why is that?

In the Marxist view of history, the sequence of time also represents the good or bad value judgment, so "the collapse of etiquette and happiness" is a kind of progress. In other words, "civilization" will inevitably triumph over "barbarism", and backwardness will inevitably be replaced by advanced; This goes hand in hand with "historical determinism". Because the Qin Dynasty was able to unify the six countries, the Qin Dynasty was advanced, and the Zhou Dynasty was advanced.

Lag; Because the Qin Dynasty was advanced and the Zhou Dynasty was backward, the Six Kingdoms that followed the Zhou system were replaced by Qin. In this regard, Guo Moruo.

Mr. simply classified the Zhou Dynasty, which was "divided into states and established the country", as a slave society; Put the implementation of the "county" of the Qin State.

Classified as a feudal society.

This is used to support "historical determinism".

But is this really true? I'm afraid it's a difficult question for us. Throughout the history of ancient and modern China and foreign countries, has civilization necessarily triumphed over barbarism?

In fact, before the advent of modern science, "civilization" was often defeated barbarically when it did not bring about the level of science and technology, and even the progress of military strength. Wasn't the Romans as civilized as the barbarians? Aren't the Song people more civilized than the Jurchens?

Or is it a Ming person, who is more backward than Houjin? But they all fell to the latter.

There are many movements in history that we consider to be positive values, all under the banner of "retro". For example, "Renaissance" is the idea of restoring ancient Rome.

The traditions of ancient Greece were much better than those of the Middle Ages; And so it is. From this point of view, is "etiquette collapse" or progress? If you have any opinions, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss together.

During the Eastern Zhou Dynasty, the code system was gradually abolished, which was the collapse of rituals, which promoted the disintegration of slave society and the redistribution of politics and economy. That's why it's a kind of social progress.

The ritual system is actually a feudal hierarchical system, that is, the current class solidification society has no mobility and no vitality, and the collapse of etiquette and music is actually a kind of liberation and a driving force for the development of society.

Although the collapse of the ritual music system had a certain impact on the social class environment at that time, on the whole, it broke through the traditional cultural atmosphere and was more conducive to the birth of new ideas and new culture. On the other hand, he was also a kind of progress in establishing a new system and adapting to the new feudal society.

It means that the rules and regulations of feudal etiquette and religion have been greatly damaged.

"Three years of mourning has been a long time. If a gentleman does not give a courtesy for three years, the courtesy will be bad; If you don't have fun for three years, the music will collapse. ”

Interpretation: It refers to the great destruction of the rules and regulations of the feudal system of the Zhou Dynasty ("feudal statehood", non-Marxist-Leninist feudal ideology), implying that the social system and cultural order have encountered major changes, and the people of the inner and outer kings are in urgent need of improvement. In ancient China, etiquette was a social code of rules and morals.

Hope it helps.