If scientists discover something that shouldn t have existed hundreds of millions of years ago, shou

Recently, there has been a lot of gossip that scientists have found fossilized footprints of humans wearing shoes on trilobites hundreds of millions of years ago, or discovered nuclear reactors 2 billion years ago, and screws hundreds of millions of years ago, etc., things that only modern civilizations can appear. It is believed that we humans are not the only civilization on the earth, because the earth has a history of 4.6 billion years, and we humans can evolve into the current civilization after millions of years, and we must have experienced several different species of civilization. The ancients said well:

In this way, we humans know that the civilization of the earth will be destroyed after a period of time, and then other civilizations will appear in cycles. In this way, we human beings have a direction for development, a reference for how human beings should develop in the future, and a time for human development, and we can study the factors that can prevent the destruction of civilization as soon as possible, and we cannot wait for human civilization to be destroyed again. It is also possible to study whether the creators of prehistoric civilizations left the earth or were wiped out.

If it is destroyed like the dinosaurs, it means that the prehistoric civilization has not yet reached the scientific and technological ability of interstellar navigation, if it leaves the earth, it means that there will be alien civilizations in the universe, and we can contact those prehistoric high-tech civilizations that have left the earth to improve the scientific and technological capabilities of human beings, so that human beings can get rid of the destruction of civilization again as soon as possible.

However, many of these gossip rumors have been debunked by scientists one by one, proving that some of them are miracles created by nature, some are products similar to modern civilization that occasionally appear by coincidence, and some are simply false rumors. No matter what kind of scientific discovery it is, it needs to be able to stand scrutiny, test, and practice. But one of the more suspicious points is that trilobites live at the bottom of the ocean and don't seem to have much chance of being stepped on.

Geologists have given the explanation that the rock is due to the spalling of the fault, but the rest of it looks like shoe prints. If there really was a prehistoric civilization, there would be a lot of evidence, and it was not just just two of them.

Indeed, if scientists find something that should not have existed hundreds of millions of years ago, it means that people from other planets on Earth have visited, or once existed but perished, requiring extreme human vigilance.

We need to be vigilant, because we don't know if this unknown object will hurt us.

Yes, human beings must always be vigilant and protect this earth in order to provide conditions for the survival of future generations.

Humanity does need to be vigilant, and if humanity does not treat the Earth well, it will one day be destroyed, and everything created on Earth will disappear with it.

If scientists discover things that shouldn't have been there hundreds of millions of years ago, do humans need to be vigilant? The meaning of the question! Let's assume that scientists have discovered organisms that existed hundreds of millions of years ago!

Including apes and humans! And now human technology and other modern things and things. Even so.

Nor can humans be vigilant. This proves that birth is death! Buddhist Theory!

Everything in the universe is cyclical. The infinite cycle of reincarnation. It's like I'm playing with my phone!

Unlimited playback. Atomic bomb: changes the outcome of the war, whoever wins the previous war has everything; When the atomic bomb entered the war, no one could win, but whoever started first only lived a few minutes longer than whoever started a few minutes later.

A catastrophe for all mankind, no one is a winner. Genetically modified biotechnology: Conclusions about the harmfulness or harmlessness of genetically modified organisms require long-term comparative experiments.

They are widely publicized, but there is no evidence that they are harmless and can affect health and lead to potential dangers to humans. Applications of plastics: Since the vast majority of plastics are non-degradable, a new continent of plastic floats has been formed in the Earth's oceans, and the world's seawater contains nano-sized plastic particles that pose a serious threat to human health.

Online shopping: The only benefit to humans is convenience; commercial economy, window culture, commercial street culture, commercial symmetry culture, change of shopping habits and street enjoyment; The return rate of online shopping adds a lot of unnecessary labor; The blind development of online shopping platforms and the increase in substandard platforms and e-commerce have encouraged counterfeit goods and substandard business practices. The last thing to be invented was a nuclear bomb.

The most harmful thing to humanity is nuclear**. Because a nuclear bomb can destroy the world and humanity. Because there will always be conflicts between nations and peoples, because the world cannot be completely just and just, because the surface of the earth must be flat everywhere, then the water will not flow, and if it does not flow, it will become water-stained and undrinkable.

Door hinges will not be eaten by bugs, flowing water will not rot Humans have been on Earth for tens of millions of years, there may have been signs of life on Earth for tens of millions of years, thousands of years old, and the history of nuclear bombs is only 70 years.

How much has the world changed in 70 years? Seventy years of change has made greater progress than the past few thousand years. In these decades, there have been more advances in science and technology than in thousands of years of history.

Televisions, computers, and mobile phones have all appeared in recent decades. These scientific and technological advances contribute to the maintenance of world peace, but not all inventions benefit humanity. For thousands of years, humanity has come out of the battlefield.

If someone had invented the nuclear bomb thousands of years ago, there might not be any human beings on Earth today. Quarrels between families are inevitable, as are conflicts between factions. If a country like Russia always talks about the atomic bomb, then it is not a myth that the Earth will become a desert island.

Shouldn't the atomic bomb have been developed?

There is no need for human vigilance, because human civilization is already very developed and can solve many problems.

Human vigilance is needed. Something that shouldn't be there is a high probability that it will pose a threat to the survival of humanity, so we must be vigilant.

It is definitely necessary to be vigilant in order to allow yourself to have a good face in life, otherwise you may have a great loss, and no one knows what exists in life.

If scientists discover something that shouldn't have been hundreds of millions of years ago, we must be wary, because if something that was already there hundreds of millions of years ago and it shouldn't have been, it will have a very unstable outcome for our future.

First of all, human beings account for a very large majority on the earth, and there are many countries on the earth, and the people in each country are very large, among which China already has more than 1.4 billion people, which shows that this number should not be underestimated. If there is something on the earth that should not be there, then it will endanger the safety of human life, and it may lead to human beings being unable to survive and survive. It would also be contrary to the human laws of nature.

As we all know, the ocean is also one of the elements of our maintenance of nature, human beings and the ocean live in peace, and the concept of win-win harmony is a win-win situation, and when unknown things endanger the ocean, we people coexist with the ocean, if there is no ocean, and we human beings will also face unbalanced development, which will also lead to the extinction of the ocean and human beings. Moreover, there are a lot of organisms and microorganisms in the ocean, and everyone coexists peacefully and contributes to the world together.

Oxygen is essential for the survival of humans and the oceans. Without oxygen, no one can survive. If this undesirable thing threatens the atmosphere and causes oxygen to gradually decrease, this is a very terrible thing.

In this way, nature will be chaotic, the whole system of nature will be rewritten, and even nature will be destroyed. For example, we turn on too many air conditioners because it is too hot in the summer, causing the ozone layer to become more and more sparse, resulting in a slow decrease in oxygen over time. This kind of threat to human health, so we must have a forward-looking concept, if this undesirable thing is discovered, we must deal with it in time.

Yes, if this is the case, you must be vigilant, because there is something in the world that we don't know exists.

Yes. Because with such things, it means that some developments on the earth are uncontrollable, and human life is not guaranteed.

Yes, if such a situation arises, it is necessary to be vigilant and respond to it.

I think we need to be vigilant, because this situation is very dangerous, so we must pay attention to this problem.