Who is stronger in the Chinese and South Korean navies? Is the South Korean Navy strong?

Updated on military 2024-06-02
15 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    Actually, we're all talking on paper, but if you look at the number and size of your navy, you can still roughly distinguish the strength of the two sides. I think the Chinese Navy is slightly stronger.

    PLA Navy arms.

    The Navy has a total of 10,000 active troops, accounting for 10% of the total number of PLA personnel. These include 10,000 naval aviation, 10,000 coastal defense troops, and 40,000 marines. It is divided into five major arms:

    Surface ship forces, submarine forces, aviation, shore defense forces and marine corps. The surface ship unit consists of a combat ship unit and a service ship unit.

    People's Liberation Army Navy ** boats.

    The People's Liberation Army Navy of the People's Republic of China has 29 destroyers, 45 frigates, 26 tank landing ships, 28 medium landing ships, 1 dock landing ship, 54 diesel-electric submarines, 12 K-class attack submarines and 54 diesel-electric submarines, including Yuan-class and Song-class submarines, 7 attack nuclear submarines, 6 Type 092 attack nuclear submarines, 1 Type 093 attack nuclear submarine and 1 ballistic missile nuclear submarine Type 094 ballistic missile nuclear submarine. 45 near-shore missile boats.

    The ROK Navy consists of three fleets: the Navy Headquarters, the Operations Command, the Marine Corps Command, the Quartermaster Command, the Education Command, and the Reclamation Base Command. The total strength is about 60,000 and 10,000 marines. The total tonnage of the ship is 200,000 tons.

    Specific information is missing).

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    If we include nuclear forces, it is obvious that China is the first, and if it is a conventional force, Japan is the first, and the Japanese navy is recognized in the world as a country whose anti-submarine and air defense capabilities are second only to those of the United States. Its 88th fleet is superior to China in terms of quality and quantity (I mean advanced ships), and Japan's conventional submarine force, although small in number, is excellent in performance, and its speed is the fastest in the world.

    As for the South Korean Navy, no matter how it is ranked, it is behind China and Japan.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    I don't know much about the Navy.

    However, I think one is that the size of China's navy is intimidating to South Korea. One is that the Chinese Navy is on a par with South Korea in terms of advanced technologies such as nuclear-powered submarines and other advanced naval forces in the world.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Although the ROK Navy has introduced and equipped many high-performance destroyers this year, the overall scale is still relatively small and its strength is average, which is inferior to that of the Chinese Navy.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Our goal is the US imperialism, don't compare ourselves with a stick, we can't afford to lose that face!

    The lackey puppet troops, who do not even have wartime command, are not qualified.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Sun Yat-sen is theirs.

    Li Shizhen is theirs.

    The Dragon Boat Festival is theirs.

    The space fleet is also theirs. .

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    In a word, the stick is not worthy of being compared with China, except for bragging that it is better than China.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    1l Not only do you not understand, but you also talk nonsense!! China has nuclear submarines, does South Korea have them? How can it be said that it is comparable?

    The ratio of the navies of China to South Korea is like that of the United States and China.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    First of all, the style: have the same equipment as Japan (only the variety, not the quantity); Secondly, the tonnage: they are all a little larger than Japan (they are all caused by comparison); And then there is loading:

    It is about 2 to 3 times that of Japan, which is usually carried by Japan, and the Japanese often can't figure out whether South Korea should be a 24-ring salute at sea or what, and they can't figure out whether South Korea can effectively release firepower proportional to the loading capacity per unit of time, and they can't figure out whether South Korea can achieve an effective war sea speed, and they don't understand how South Korea can sink so many ships; Finally, let's talk about quality: Everyone knows the Tianan, has anyone paid attention to that section? The thing I don't understand the most is because of the high technology in South Korea, I can't understand whether it is Shenma material or whether it is plywood (plywood) like clouds.

    Why does it remind me of the broken plywood decorative door in my hometown?

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Personally, I think it's Japan.

    Why? I list the following personal opinions for the landlord:

    1. Japan is second in anti-submarine and first in minesweeping. How much does he have a stick?

    2. In terms of quantity, Japan completely surpasses South Korea.

    3. Japan has 52 destroyers, and the longest service time is 20 to 25 years, and the degree of localization is high, basically except for the Aegis system on the four "King Kong" ships, the others are all domestically produced. And the destroyer of the stick is also claimed to be domestic, but many systems were bought (among them is the proud Dokdo).

    4. Japan's submarine force is also self-built, and the three AIP Soryu class that have just been put into service have reached the world's advanced level. And the sticks are to be bought.

    5. Japan has the famous 8.8 Fleet, which will soon transition to the 9.10 Fleet. And the Fifth Mobile Regiment of the Stick has just been formed and has not yet formed combat effectiveness.

    In terms of the above points, the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force" South Korean Navy.

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    The gap between the Japanese and South Korean navies is extremely huge, and the ROK Navy is no match for the Japanese Maritime Self-Defense Force in terms of quantity and quality

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    It doesn't make sense to talk about who is strong, it's all armed by the United States.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    Of course, it is Japan that pulls the submarines, and the Japanese submarines do not seek too much refinement, and every few years there are activities of exchanging the old for the new, and in terms of science and technology, they also vigorously support the construction of the navy, thus maintaining the absolute superiority of Japanese submarines, and the ROK has a temporary gap with Japan in both economic and technological terms.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    Korean Stick is definitely not a small Japanese opponent,

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    Half of our country! The number of ships is 200 units.

Related questions
24 answers2024-06-02

To tell the truth, the **rank is a scumbag, and it will only pass through it at the beginning of the season when you have to fight from bronze upwards**, if you really meet a random teammate at the end of the season or **rank, you must change decisively! >>>More

9 answers2024-06-02

It is not certain that Brazil won the first game of the two teams, but each has its own characteristics.

16 answers2024-06-02

A matter of probability! The first team is basically dominated by members of the Dream One team, and it is reported that the level of the Dream One team that year was 20 years ahead of the world! In other words, whoever you fight will win! >>>More

9 answers2024-06-02

The Dutch midfield is very strong, but it has the same fatal weakness as Spain: it is not psychologically mature enough, and it is not very good at playing against the wind, but it still likes the offensive style of play of the Netherlands, which is very enjoyable!

11 answers2024-06-02

Uruguay's attack will be sharper than Germany's, and the effort will be stronger. >>>More