The daughter was playing on the Pizza Hut sofa and fell and got 7 stitches, and the mother asked the

Why should I pay? Is she unreasonable or because she can't look at the child? Why are parents so shameless now?

I can't afford to see the child, and there is water on the sofa in the Pizza Hut restaurant? So why don't you rely on the earth to have gravity? How good it is to let the earth compensate you, in the future, your children will not be limited by the gravitational force of the earth, and it will be over if they fly directly into outer space and into the universe, what are you looking for a restaurant for?

One. The daughter accidentally fell down while playing on the Pizza Hut sofa, and after 7 stitches, the parents asked for compensation The bear parents may not educate a bear child, but there must be a bear parent behind the bear child. No, a recent incident in Pizza Hut once again opened the conversation among netizens.

Just because the child fell while playing on the Pizza Hut couch and got 7 stitches,The child's mother asked Pizza Hut to compensate for this, and for a while, netizens didn't even know what words to use to describe the mother, eldest sister, don't you really think about touching porcelain?

The eldest sister had a good reason to claim compensation, she believed that it was because there was water on the Pizza Hut sofa, which caused the sofa to be slippery, so the child would fall and hit the corner of the eye, if it weren't for this, her child would not have fallen down for the stitches. However, in fact, the logic of this eldest sister is the same as falling and the ground is uneven, it is a very normal phenomenon for the sofa to have water, and there is no clause that stipulates that there can be no water on the sofa in the restaurantParents are taking their children out, these details are the responsibility of parents, not the restaurant, in other words, the sofa has water, but who allows the children to run and jump back and forth on the sofa?

Two. Behind the frequent appearance of bear children, who cares about bear parents The first time I saw this news, I actually recalled the many incidents that have occurred frequently in the past two years when bear children and bear parents were angry together. It is more common, like a bear child causing trouble, a bear parent said, you want to be perfunctory when you are an adult and a child.

More seriously, some bear children put hot pot on other people's faces, resulting in severe disabilities, and the bear's parents think that the other party is mainly responsible. What we can see is,Behind every bear child, not to mention 100%, at least more than 90%, there is a bear parent. In other words, as the source of children's education, children's behavior also reflects the quality of parents.

Combined with this incident, I don't know how bearish this child is, but I was deeply shocked by the logic of this parent's handling of itEven he even thinks that there is no problem with his logic, which already represents the mother, in fact, there is also a lack of education. We can attribute the different ways of dealing with different people to personality, but this kind of situation where there is obviously a distortion of values and worldviews is no longer something that can be brushed aside by a single sentence of personality.

There is no need to discuss too much whether or not to pay, and whether or not to pay is a conclusive conclusion, and there is no room for refutation. But what we should discuss is actually whether this kind of bear parents are really qualified to educate their children? What hidden dangers will the children they educate make in this society?

It should not be compensated, the restaurant is for everyone to eat, not for children to frolic and play, and knowing that children are potentially dangerous running around on the sofa, why can't they stop the children in time, let them continue to frolic and hurt themselves, this is because adults do not supervise children, what does it have to do with other restaurants.

The daughter was playing on the Pizza Hut sofa and broke 7 stitches, the mother asked the restaurant to lose money, I think it should be compensated, the daughter was playing at Pizza Hut, and the clerk did not fulfill the obligation to take care of the child, so she must bear part of the responsibility!

I don't think it should be paid. Because the child was injured during the fight, it was caused by the lack of adult supervision, and it has nothing to do with the restaurant.

Personally, I don't think there is a need for compensation, the child fell and injured because of the guardian's negligence, if there is a weapon on the sofa, it must not be out of the matter, but it is only a fall, then it is the guardian's dereliction of duty.

I don't think I should pay for it, and no one wants to see this situation when the child is injured, but I think it has nothing to do with the restaurant, it is the responsibility of the parents.

Obviously, this has nothing to do with the restaurant, which is a place to eat and not a place to play, and besides, the child will fall because the parents are not careful, and the parents should be responsible.

I should pay for it, I fell at your doorstep, and you have to lose money, and I will touch it in the future.

If you don't pay for it, the parents themselves don't take care of it.

Why would this woman ask the restaurant for compensation, it is clear that the restaurant will compensate out of humanitarianism even if it is not responsible.

If your child doesn't look good, you should blame yourself for falling to death.

I just want to know who to pay for, whether the parents are at fault and the party with vested interests, is it a contradiction?

Can a person who has been involved in a car accident on the road find a road builder to pay for it?

The daughter ran crazy and injured 7 stitches in Pizza Hut, and her mother made the restaurant responsible, is it fraudulent money?

03. The responsibility of the child's parents is the greatest, and they should reflect on their own problems. Although restaurants have a certain responsibility, I think the parents of the children are more responsible. Because the child is still young, when he goes out to eat, the parents should take good care of the child, if there is a mistake, the most heart-wrenching is the parents, and the parents should be most responsible for this.

According to the surveillance provided by Pizza Hut, the child's father was next to him at the time, watching his daughter running around on the sofa and not stopping it, and only reacted when he saw his daughter falling. Apparently this father has not fulfilled his duty to watch over his childrenWhen eating in a public restaurant, who will watch if the child doesn't watch by himself? Even if there is no water on the couch, the possibility of running and wrestling is still thereTherefore, they should reflect on themselves instead of blindly talking about compensation!

If in an old factory, with an old sharp machine, although everyone is very obedient to the rules, but there are still many, many people's fingers were pricked off, suddenly one day the machine was optimized, since then the number of injured people began to decrease, after the infrared induction was installed on the machine, and then no one was injured, suddenly one day the girl ran to the construction site and put her hand on the blade of the machine, and the blood flowed for a while, and then the girl's mother found the construction site and said that the machine in the factory had potential safety hazards and should be responsible for the girl. After that, a mother and daughter can spend 10 yuan to eat in a restaurant with 100000000000 yuan, and no matter how much they fight, they will not be hurt.

Rules, self-discipline, technology, and technology will not bring disaster if any of them can reach 100%, I am afraid that I am only afraid.

Isn't this what is fraudulent money? Are there three views? Take the children to the restaurant to eat, in a public place, the parents sit aside, let the two children run and jump on the sofa, not to mention affecting the people who eat next to them, and if they fall, they will find all kinds of things that the restaurant is not like.

If you don't take care of your own children, others should take care of you at all times. If you can't afford to take care of it, don't take it out of the door.

Yes, why don't parents care, you are not as tall as her, not as big as her, or less powerful than her, no, the restaurant is very wronged, the restaurant just can't refuse people with children to dine, otherwise I guess he wants to prohibit children from entering, it's too wrong, and the compensation comes unexpectedly.

Yes, the sofa in the restaurant is used to sit, the child runs on it, and the parents sit on the bottom and don't care, which is obviously the fault of the parents, but it makes no sense for the restaurant to lose money.

It must be fraudulent money, Pizza Hut is a chain, and there must be money to lose. Have you seen the incident of playing with your mobile phone with a suitcase on the subway escalator? Because he didn't take it properly, the suitcase fell and hit the head of the passenger below and immediately went into shock, but the owner of the suitcase told the subway that he couldn't take the suitcase to the escalator.

Honestly sit and eat, will it hurt, the sofa is used to sit, not to step on, and even the most basic rules are not taught to children, such parents are not bad, they are also bear parents.

The girl's mother is the legal guardian of the child, and if she does not take good care of the child and causes the child to be injured, the responsibility lies with herself, and it is a lie to make the restaurant responsible.

It's clear that it's money, which obviously means that I didn't take good care of my daughter, and my mother should be responsible for this, what does it have to do with the restaurant.

Looking forward (money), I am not optimistic, and I am used to making children lose money, and this child is not necessarily a good child when he grows up.

Now people are like this, you see that if her daughter falls and is injured on the road, her family will definitely sue the road administration for compensation. Didn't you see drunk driving and hitting a street light, do you have to sue for compensation? As long as there is money to pay them for their hearts, they can do without it.

It's not money. The restaurant has an obligation to take care of the safety of its customers, and the little girl was hit with a few stitches, and the restaurant should lose money.

My child didn't watch it, it was a place to eat, not to play, and if it ran around and touched the hot water, it was not a joke.

If you don't look at the child and complain about the restaurant, then your child falls down on the road, do you have to complain about the road repair.

I feel that I don't take care of my children and cause problems, and then talk about other people's restaurants, which is a waste of money.

There are tables in the restaurant. Chair. Toothpick. Chopsticks. Aren't plates a must-have item in every restaurant? Don't have a table for customers to eat with plates?

Keep an eye on your kids at home and outside! This parent has a great responsibility!

It's money, her daughter is self-harming, and the restaurant doesn't need to be responsible.

Your child touched the train and wanted to pay the state