Why does having a son break the fortune? The basis for giving birth to a son and breaking his fortun

Because he needs to marry a daughter-in-law when he grows up, and marrying a daughter-in-law requires a bride price, a car and a house, and many women ask for a lot of bride price, and what do they need a few gold, anyway, they spend a lot of money, so they will be ruined.

You're saying that too absolutely, aren't you? How can it be said to be giving birth? If you give birth to a boy, you will be ruined? Some have a boy or a chance to continue to make money.

So don't be too absolute, this kind of feudal superstition is unacceptable.

It's just that after giving birth to a son, he may have to make a small fortune, that is, to buy a car and a house for his son, but if his son is angry and makes a lot of money by himself, then there is no need for it, right?

Why does giving birth to a son break the fortune This sentence why giving birth to a son will break the wealth This sentence is too general Why is it born to break the stage There is no such saying at all What tea is broken when you give birth to a son The son can also earn money by himself When you grow up, who said that you will take a daughter-in-law for him You also took and sent a person You give your family a succession Well, well, I came to your house in the morning, and there are young ones who serve the old ones, and such a small one is not considered a broken fortune, and the money is also taken back For our family to live and marry this daughter-in-law, it is worth spending some money.

Why does having a son break the fortune? Because after giving birth to a son, it costs a lot of money for your son to marry a wife, and he has to buy a house with his son, not only to raise his son, but also to spend a lot of money, so it is said that giving birth to a son will break the bank. Everyone says that having a daughter is China Merchants Bank, and giving birth to a son is China Construction Bank.

You have to work hard to make money.

This statement is more general, generally born a son will think about getting married and marrying a daughter-in-law in the future, buying a house and a car, and a lot of dowry, thinking that it is a broken fortune, in fact, it is not like this, some sons can make money when they grow up, and they should be rich, so they can't be generalized.

Sentences that people can't be too kind, people can't be too kind classic words 1, life is always like this, you can't make people satisfied everywhere, don't be harsh on others, don't be too yourself, stay kind, and be sincere.

Think about how expensive it is to have a son now. Not to mention the money spent on raising him, just talk about the money it costs to get married. Now getting married is basically a house and a car, which is a bit stressful for the average family.

Because there is such a custom in many places, after giving birth to a son, you need to prepare some houses and a bride price.

So for them, they feel that having a son is a thing that will go bankrupt, and girls are even more wealthy.

It means that when you give birth to a child, not only can you not bring wealth, but you can also have trouble and unexpectedly break your fortune.

may think that he gave birth to a son and wants to buy a house for his son to marry or something, of course, there is no such thing as a broken fortune!

Who said this, how can there be such an idea, it is good to have your own children to have anything.

It varies from person to person, so don't believe it blindly. If you can't raise a child well, you are a loser.

Don't listen to other people's nonsense, who said that having a son would ruin the wealth? This is superstition, don't believe it!

There is no such thing as this, that is, the child needs to buy a house when he gets married, and the child is sensible, so the parents don't have to worry about it at all, and the birth of children is natural! If the conditions are good, even the daughter is the same, and there are many dowries.

It's not true, as long as the child is educated well, it is equally good to have a boy and a girl.

Definitely not, it's normal to have a son and a daughter.

It's not right for him to hold other girls, but depending on his usual performance, don't cut them all with an axe. True love is not easy to come by!!

Now many people say that having a son is retribution, and the bride price for marrying a wife in the future is too expensive, and you must prepare a house when your son gets married, and buying a house is also very expensive. So many people ridicule that giving birth to a son is a hug.

Why do many people now say that having a son is retribution? I haven't heard so many people around me say this. The birth of a son is all congratulations.

Perhaps very few people have this statement. It may be that it costs a lot of money to get married after having a son. In fact, it doesn't have to cost a lot of money to have a son and get married.

How about the attitude of the parents on both sides? Sensible parents won't. It's the same as selling your daughter, asking for a bride price, asking for so much.

The reason why I believe that some people say that having a son is retribution is that I personally think it should be understood as a ridiculous word, but from another side, we can also see the economic pressure on parents who raise sons.

Because for the parents of those families who raise their sons, their economic pressure is relatively large, so that their sons are brought up, and the consumption of material and energy paid for their sons to go to school is naturally needless to say, when their sons graduate from college, many parents worry about their sons' jobs, and when their sons finally find a job, they are worried that their sons can't find a partner, and when their sons find a partner, they often buy a house for their sons to get married and start a family, and the bride price money for the woman, these things are worried, after all, these things need to cost a lot of financial resources to achieve, and it is a big burden for ordinary working-class families.

And when their son gets married and has children, they have to help their sons and daughters-in-law to bring their children, and sometimes they have to live with their sons and daughters-in-law, and for many mothers-in-law, getting along with their daughters-in-law, sometimes there will be all kinds of conflicts between mothers-in-law and daughters-in-law, therefore, many parents who have given birth to sons will say that the birth of a son is retribution, in fact, for this problem, we should also look at it objectively, whether it is a boy or a girl, As parents, they should fulfill their responsibilities, and at the same time, they should also look at the various problems encountered in the process of pulling their children, and maintain a certain peace and tolerance attitude, so that they can make their lives more fulfilling and their hearts more peaceful.

People often say that having a son is a blessing, especially in ancient times, there were countless people who had this idea in their hearts. This is not because those who give birth to sons are really blessed, but because from ancient times when the patrilineal clans began, people were patriarchal to feudal dynasties.

It also engraved the brand of male superiority and inferiority into his bones.

The ancients believed that men were inherently superior to women, and of course this idea is completely fallacious from a modern point of view. In terms of IQ, emotional intelligence, morality, talent, etc., there is no gap between men and women.

In some places, you have to have a son, even if you are poor, you have to have a lot of children, and you think that the more sons, the better.

It should be the old traditional thinking that blames the people.

There are still many people who have a patriarchal mentality.

You are right, it should be typical.

Sons can carry on the lineage.

The daughter will be someone else's family in the future.

The feudal mentality lasted for thousands of years.

There are still many people who do this.

Especially in remote and backward places.

However, with the development of the economy.

This kind of thinking will get smaller and smaller.

I can't think about it! I still think that having a son can support the elderly, and there are descendants who can take over the household registration book. They all hold this kind of ideology, and they have to have sons when they die poor. But they never thought about what kind of life they could give their children.

Because the son is hope, if he is born well, he will change the status quo of the family, and he can also pass on the lineage.

The result of the idea of the succession of old traditions and the influence of local social mores.

Influenced by traditional concepts, the idea that men and women are the same has not yet taken root in the hearts of the people.

From ancient times to the present, it is the most important thing to pass on the ancestry, there are three unfilial pieties, and no queen is great, so this is a kind of ideological thing, so there is still this kind of thinking until now.

Some places are more superstitious, and there are patriarchal people, who feel that they will have four generations in the same house in the future, and the family will be prosperous, and some family trees will not write the girl's name.

It is because of thousands of years of feudal concepts that raise children to prevent old age, and sons are the descendants, so many people have sons no matter how poor they are.

Because the son is passed on from generation to generation, it is necessary to say that the son is necessary.

Amusing. He had only one son in his life. And he's bored.