Why is it said that it is better to believe in a book than to have no book ?

It is better to believe in a book than to have no book at all.

This quote comes from Mencius. Wholeheartedly". It means that you can't believe all the books when you read a book, you can't blindly believe in the books, you should use your brains more and analyze them carefully.

1.The knowledge in the book is not entirely correct.

Nowadays, there are all kinds of books, many theories appear in books without being confirmed, and some books published by non-authoritative publishing houses are likely to have some small errors that cannot be discovered in time, then we need to discern by ourselves, if you blindly believe, you will go more and more astray.

2.The views in the book may not be comprehensive

The content of the book is written or summarized by individuals, and contains too many personal opinions, perhaps just a one-sided understanding of individuals, which can easily distort the reader's point of view and be more or less affected. And now the requirements for publishing a book are much lower, to put it simply, as long as there is a certain amount of money, anyone can publish a book, maybe it's just a matter of the number of readers. Reading is inseparable from personal thinking at the same time, if you only read, don't think about it is better if you don't read, you should read with a ** heart, combined with the actual careful analysis.

3.Knowledge will change with the times.

The truth is a fallacy one step forward, this sentence has a little truth, maybe the current is just the truth, but we can't guarantee that with the change of the times, he is still indestructible, so we should have a long-term vision when we read books, but I don't mean to let you deny it entirely, some simple and objective knowledge is completely believable, such as one plus one equals two, there is no need to be more true for this.

4.Practice makes sense.

People with a lot of knowledge can easily succeed, but those who don't have a high degree can also succeed, just because they have a lot of experience in life and learn lessons. Able to comprehend knowledge that is not even available in the book. Therefore, storytelling has a great role, but it is not all, and it needs to be combined with practice.

Mencius said: "It is better to believe in the book than to have no book."

Marx said: "It is necessary to look at problems dialectically."

"Faithful" is to make the mistake of dogmatism, to mechanically apply other people's experience and copy other people's methods regardless of the actual situation. "It is better to believe in books than to have no books" admonishes us to break the form of dogma, not to believe in books and rely on books, we must flexibly use the knowledge in books in light of our own actual conditions, and oppose the dogmatic style of rigid dogma. "It is better to believe in books than to have no books", or "to have your own ** house in the book", we must look at the problem dialectically, books can broaden our horizons, expand our thinking, change our temperament, improve our ability, books are the ladder of our growth.

But we must absorb and chew according to our own situation, so that the knowledge in books can become our own nutrients and become things of personal value to us.

We can't believe in books but we must read more, some things we can only experience in books, reading is a lifelong learning process, combined with our observation and practice, we must be able to experience a different understanding.

Books are the best of our knowledge, we learn from books, there are good and bad ones, we can't believe them all, we have to have our own ideas, learn the parts that are good for us.

Most of the thoughts and opinions expressed in the book are other people's thoughts and opinions, and readers should selectively learn from them, not "trust", but always have their own thinking.

Books can only be used as a tool, and they can make mistakes. It just helps us understand better.

Because there are good and bad books, just as there are two sides to everything. Therefore, you must not believe in all the letters, but also have your own thoughts.

The opinions, conclusions, quotes, and even formulas and theorems written in the books are likely to be overturned many years later, and everything must be based on the ideas of practice, development, and innovation, and you must dare to explore it yourself, not just remember the thoughts of others.

Book knowledge is important, but it is also good and bad. In addition, book knowledge is not 100% correct. Applying what you have learned means that optics will not be used and will not work. Must be able to use it. It depends on the actual situation. You can't just use book knowledge and don't know how to be flexible.

With the development of the times, new inventions are constantly emerging, and some books have long been outdated and have long been unsuitable for this era, and we must always be suspicious of books.

Most of the principles in the book are used under special conditions, and it is difficult for ordinary people to distinguish under what conditions these principles are used.

It is good to read more books, but there are also things that can and cannot be read in reading, and you must learn to think independently.

Books are just a reference for ordinary people, and they are still practical for us. Moreover, there are good and bad books, and we still need to discern. Blind faith can only lead us to extremes.

1. It is better to believe in books, than to have no books, a Chinese idiom, which means that reading books should not be confined to books or superstitious books, from "Mencius: Devoted Heart".

2. [Zhuyin] jìn xìn shū bù rú wú shū.

3. [Explanation] Generally refers to reading, do not stick to books or superstitious books.

4. [From] "Mencius: Wholeheartedly": "Believe in the book." It is better to have no book (if you believe in the book, it is better to have no book). I am in Wucheng, and I just take two or three strategies." Song Lu Jiuyuan.

The Principle of Politics is Broad and Fierce": "Woohoo, it is better to believe in books than to have no books."

5. [Example] Is history credible? All we can say is: generally credible. To say that it is completely untrustworthy is to be nihilistic.

But the ancient admonition of -- still has some truth.

1. If you fully believe in the "Book of Shang", it is better not to have "Book of Shang".

2. This sentence comes from the hunger key of "Mencius: Devoted Heart" during the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period.

3. Original text: Mencius said: "If you believe in the book, you will not have the book as if you did not have the book." I am in Wucheng, and I just take two or three strategies." Benevolence is invincible in the world, so that benevolence is unkind, and what is the blood of the pestle? ”

4. Translation of the Bad and Kuanqiao Text: Mencius said: "If you fully believe in the Book of Shang, it is better not to have the Book of Shang."

I only believe in two or three pages of the book "Wu Cheng". Benevolence has no enemies in the world, how can an extremely benevolent person like King Wu of Zhou crusade against an extremely unkind person like Shang Xuan? ”

Zhao Kuo talked on paper.

During the Warring States Period, Zhao Hao, the general of Zhao State, once defeated the invading Qin army with less victories, and was promoted to Shangqing by King Zhao Huiwen. He has a son named Zhao Kuo, who has been familiar with military books since he was a child, and loves to talk about military affairs, and others often can't talk about him. Therefore, he is very proud and thinks he is invincible in the world.

However, Zhao Hao was very worried about him, thinking that he was just talking on paper, and said: "In the future, Zhao will not use him as a general, and if he is used as a general, he will definitely make the Zhao army suffer defeat." ”

Sure enough, in 259 BC, the Qin army attacked again, and the Zhao army insisted on resisting the enemy in Changping, when Zhao Hao had already died. Lian Po was in charge of commanding the whole army, and although he was old, he still had a good way to fight, which made it impossible for the Qin army to win.

Qin knew that it would be detrimental to him to drag it out, so he carried out a counter-plot and sent people to Zhao State to spread the words that "the Qin army is most afraid of General Zhao Kuo, the son of Zhao Hao". King Zhao was deceived and sent Zhao Kuo to replace Lian Po.

Zhao Kuo thought that he was very good at fighting and being cautious, and the provisions on the book of moving troops to death completely changed Lian Po's battle plan after arriving in Changping, and as a result, more than 400,000 Zhao troops were annihilated, and he himself was killed by Qin army's arrows.

The meaning of this sentence is that if you fully believe what is said in the book, it is better not to have the book. The fundamental principle is not to be too rigid about the knowledge in the books, the times are changing, the information is also changing, the knowledge in the books needs to be analyzed when reading, if the situation is different but the knowledge in the books is often not successful. If you don't look at books from the perspective of dialectical materialism, you will become a nerd.

1. It is better to believe in books than to have no books, which generally refers to reading, not to be confined to books, hungry or superstitious books.

2. Source: "Mencius" "Wholeheartedly Chapter and Sentences". Original text of the work:

Mencius said: "Rotten and wide" is better than not having "books". I am in "Wu Qiao Kuancheng", and I only take two or three strategies.

Benevolence is invincible in the world, so that benevolence is unkind, and what is the blood of the pestle?