Tell us why whistleblowers are ostracized.

If whistleblowing becomes a popular culture in a group, the sense of security and trust in that group is gone. People get stuck in a vicious cycle of everyone putting themselves in danger and then exposing each other and protecting themselves. Whistleblowing is no longer an act of integrity, but a tool to exclude dissent and create fear.

The informer's psychology is dominated by jealousy, followed by the psychology of perfectionism, and he likes to make small reports on things or people that he is not used to, and he likes to make small reports, which is called defending the truth, but in fact, he is simply nosy, which is probably why he is excluded by everyone.

I think whistleblowers are generally very jealous, and Lu Yao knows that Ma Ma has been popular for a long time, so he will be excluded. Let them go, in fact, you don't have to care so much in your heart, the clear ones are self-purifying. Just let them perform like a clown in front of people.

In fact, in ancient times, people knew the seriousness of the problem of whistleblowing, and there is such a story in the Analects, Ye Gong told Confucius: "There are very upright people in our place, the father steals sheep, and the son comes out to report and expose it." In Confucius's view, the ethical affection between relatives is more important than the so-called integrity.

Whistleblowers can satisfy a means of revenge, such as we often hear in school that if we don't listen to me, I'll tell the teacher, etc., once we have this mentality, people's personality will become distorted and will be rejected by the public.

People with poor ability will also temporarily gain the trust of managers and make up for the shortcomings of their own abilities, but these often hurt the people around them and will be despised by the public.

Personally, I think whistleblowers are people who are not confident and have poor abilities. They will highlight their abilities by informing their teachers or superiors, and they will feel balanced when they see others being criticized.

Whistleblowing has become a means, trust has become a danger, in a place where everyone is in danger, full of panic, too transparent, people will have a sense of collapse, because people have a lack of and the psychology of seeking advantages and avoiding disadvantages.

People are imperfect, but all individuals will have some faults and handles, which is inevitable. I think that as long as we do not endure serious infringement of our own interests, as long as it is not an emergency where our lives are at stake, we should not use the means of seeing the light to carry out "moral assassination" against others with any purpose, and only by acknowledging people's imperfections, recognizing the weaknesses of human nature, and being less scheming, can we eliminate the soil of everyone's self-danger.

People who love to make small reports are people who want to climb up, people who follow the yang and disobey the yin, and people who are good and good. You can't get too close to this kind of person, he will find a way to step on your head and make you a stepping stone for him to rise.

In fact, I am also more disgusted with the whistleblower, as a class teacher, this behavior seems to bring convenience to my work, but in fact, it will increase the contradictions of the classmates, and the students will reject the whistleblower, and then hate the class teacher.

You can't offend him, he has time to spend with you, and you will be the one who will fall when the time comes. That's why they're ostracized.

Why is it that the environment in which I am living is that the informants are well mixed and the defendants are ostracized? Is everyone a villain?

The big mouth still needs to be restrained a little.

Don't say what you know.

Snitch? How to snitch? Why do I need so many people to tell and watch TV when I fall in love?

Disagreement or even conflict is necessary and very welcome. If there is no disagreement and conflict, organizations cannot understand each other; Without understanding, only wrong decisions will be made. ”

But if you tell the truth because of disagreements, it's a matter of character. What problems can be solved face-to-face. Traitors in wartime never end well.

Under normal circumstances, superior leaders like to whistleblow, but they must be handled correctly, and if the conflict intensifies, it is a problem of leadership ability.

If you're working under a leadership that likes to snitch, you have to be careful. First of all, you can't talk much, but as long as you do the right thing, you must also be upright and fight for reason. But if it doesn't affect the overall situation and occasionally endures, there may be a sea and sky ahead.

Try to keep a certain distance from the person who likes to snitch.

I think the whistleblower you mentioned should be your colleague making a small report to the leader. It's not surprising that such things happen everywhere. For such people, you should stay away, pay attention to what you say and do, and do not ask people to grab the pigtails.

Whistleblowers generally make small reports to the leader to win the leader's like, and it is their hobby to attack others to elevate themselves.

There must always be contacts between people, and there will be contradictions when they come into contact with people. The body is not afraid of the shadow, go your own way and let others say it.

Whistleblowing is usually for personal emotions or purposes, and certainly not for the person concerned. This kind of behavior is sneaky, sneaky, and not a fair move.