Both husband and wife go to work, and their in laws don t take care of the children, and they don t

Both husband and wife go to work, and their in-laws don't take care of the children, and they don't have the money to hire a nanny, what should they do?

First, please ask a reliable aunt nearby.

In some communities, there are a lot of retired aunts. They have no grandchildren to take care of, and their lives are relatively boring. So they are willing to help the community, help the children whose parents go to work, and no one takes them there.

These old people are also not very demanding. Just give more subsidies and send something. And don't worry that these elderly people won't take care of their children, because they are not short of money and just want to enjoy the joy of taking care of children.

In general, they are not subject to child abuse or abuse. Therefore, parents who need this can ask the elderly around them more. However, it is worth noting that a child can only be given to him if he believes in it very much and knows it very well.

Otherwise, people will be separated from each other. If they are not good for their children, it is not good.

Second, ask your grandfather and grandmother for help.

Although many families now have grandparents to take care of their children, they are not obligated to take care of their children. Similarly, grandparents are not obligated to help take care of their children. But then again, many elderly people are very fond of children and don't mind helping them take care of them.

So, if the grandparents don't want to take the baby, you can also ask the grandparents to help see if they are willing to help with the baby. It's like my home.

All the same, my grandparents helped us take care of it. But no matter which elderly person takes care of the baby, they need to give more money. We can't let them take care of the children, and we have to pay for them.

Third, send the child to daycare.

Today's nurseries are quite reliable. A friend once sent his child to kindergarten. At that time, there were less than 15 children and two teachers in the class. All responsible. While taking care of life, we also pay attention to developing the intellect and exercising language organization skills.

After going to kindergarten, it is much better than the children brought by the parents themselves. So, it's also good to send your baby to daycare when no one is really taking it with you. It takes some time to choose a nursery.

Talk to the principal first to see if their parenting theories are consistent with your own. Listen again to see the teacher's true attitude towards the child. If these points are all right, it is quite reliable to send your child to the nursery.

I think that at this time, you should choose to send the child back to your in-laws, or ask your relatives and friends to help take care of it, if the conditions are really not allowed, you can choose one of the husband and wife to resign and take care of the child at home, so as to avoid serious impact on the child.

It is most correct to ask the wife to quit her job and take care of the children at home, because the children are still very young, and if you leave the children at home, they are particularly prone to accidents.

The wife can take care of the children, and the husband goes out to earn money, which is more reasonable.

You can take the initiative to express your thoughts.

If you are a stay-at-home mother alone, then you should ask your husband to pay for living expenses, which is the most basic.

If your husband doesn't give you living expenses, you can go out and work on your own to make money.

Then you should have a good talk with your husband, they all let you take care of the family at home, and you have to take care of the children, why don't you give you pocket money? If that's the case, why don't you go out and work, let them take care of the children, manage the family, and see how they are?

As long as they are ruthless and don't care about the baby, they will be cowardly. The co-authored baby is theirs, you are a free nanny, an outsider, how can the nanny give money, she will be wild if she gives money.

This situation is not very good, you need to spend money to take care of the baby at home, and it is right to ask your husband for money directly.

Let you take the child, and still give you money? What good things have been taken up by the in-laws? So what is your life ** to look at?

Your in-laws are not obliged to help you take care of your children, because the children are your own, and your parents-in-law's obligation is to bring up their own children, as for what you want to do, as for what kind of things you will face, it has nothing to do with him. If you don't help take care of the children and don't pay, your parents-in-law really shouldn't be blamed, because people really don't have the obligation to help you take care of the children, and you must bring it yourself, how can you blame others? If you can't even afford to raise a child, then why would you give birth to him?

Why do you want to get married? Why can't you wait until your financial situation is better before getting married and having children? <>

In fact, there are many contradictions, all because the mother-in-law is unwilling to help take care of the children, so it is like this. The main body of the contradiction is not that we have to ask our mother-in-law to help take care of our children, but because the current society is like this, the pressure is very high, and if only one person goes to work, there is really no way to support the children. Of course, some people must say that if you don't have conditions, don't get married and have children, but there are many people in this world who don't have conditions, is everyone a billionaire?

It's definitely impossible. If someone can help, can help take care of the children, and then the two of them work hard outside, life will be much better. <>

Whenever we mention whether the in-laws are obliged to take care of the children, we will inevitably mention another point, that is, whether the daughter-in-law has the obligation to support the in-laws? What we have to know is that in the law, the daughter-in-law does not have any obligation to support her in-laws, and the in-laws also do not have any obligation to help take care of the children, so these things can only look at yourself, if the relationship between the two of you is very good, if your mother-in-law is willing to help you take care of the child, it is naturally nothing to say, which can reduce a lot of pressure on young people, but if he is not willing to help bring it, then you have no way, even if it is useless to be good to her, people just don't want to. <>

"In fact, from a legal point of view, the in-laws must not have the obligation to take care of the child, even if the parents raise the child until the age of 18, they can no longer take care of it. It is not easy for people to live a lifetime, they have struggled for a lifetime, and when they are old, they want to live for themselves and live a few easy days, which is understandable.

I don't think my in-laws have the obligation to help take care of the children, if you can take care of the children, you should be grateful to them, you really can't give them and you can't do it, and you shouldn't be blamed if you don't help take care of the children and don't pay.

Definitely not, if you have a baby you have to raise it yourself, and I think they will only take care of the child to reduce the pressure on you.

It's true that my in-laws are not obliged to take care of my children, but I think that as a family, I should still have some help in treating my children.

Personally, I am also a woman, married twice, two in-laws, according to my experience, some old people are selfish, neither money nor effort, feel that their son is enough to support his daughter-in-law and grandson, and even find fault with his daughter-in-law, such old people still try to keep their distance, some old people are more than enough and not enough, they do think about their son's family, but also about their grandson, although they have no money, but they will have other expressions, for example, make some small clothes and quilts for children, buy some toys, Or some rural old people will even save eggs for their children, some eggs are even broken and they are reluctant to eat such old people are actually really not easy, my second mother-in-law is like this, the first is Wenzhou, not only do not help, but also everywhere say bad things about the daughter-in-law, just make money hard, the daughter-in-law does not work and the like, I divorced because of this old man.

In fact, our hearts are made of meat, people are good to us, we will definitely feel, as long as the old man is not excessive, or to give the elderly, compared with the traditional virtues of the Chinese nation, we will also be afraid of neighbors and relatives poking the backbone, and the elderly do not live together, young people have to work, it is difficult to take care of children, it is impossible to let go of everything, if there are conditions, hire a nanny, or live in a nursing home, if there is no condition, accompany to the hospital to see a doctor, buy medicine, often call ** greetings I think it is enough.

My parents-in-law didn't help take care of the children, and whether they were daughters-in-law or not, and I think it was all wishful thinking. If the children are filial, then the in-laws will not give the children to support the two old people?

Father-in-law and mother-in-law are not obliged to take grandchildren, and daughters-in-law are not obliged to provide for them, but sons are obliged to provide for them.

Grandparents are not obligated to bring their grandchildren.

Grandchildren are not obligated to provide for their grandparents.

Sons are obliged to provide for their parents in old age.

The daughter-in-law is obliged to provide for her in-laws with her husband.

The son-in-law is obliged to provide for his parents-in-law with his wife.

After the death of the husband, the wife may not provide for the original in-laws.

After the death of his wife, the husband may not provide for his parents-in-law.

In addition to the legal provisions, they are all ethical issues.

Kung Fu father-in-law and mother-in-law have no obligation to help the child, whether the father-in-law and mother-in-law have no obligation to help the child, whether the daughter-in-law is not obliged to provide for the parents-in-law. Unless you divorce his son, if you do. His son.

There is an obligation to provide for the elderly. As long as you have been together, you have the righteousness of providing for the elderly, as long as you have been together, you have the obligation to provide for the elderly, as long as you have been together, you have the obligation to provide for the elderly.

Hello, the parents-in-law are not obliged to help take care of the children, but the daughter-in-law is obliged to provide for the parents-in-law!

These are two concepts, it is a natural thing for children to provide for their parents to provide for the elderly, and parents-in-law have no obligation to take grandchildren, and the law does not stipulate so, but children who do not support the elderly will be punished by law.

Parents-in-law have no obligation to help take care of the children, but the daughter-in-law is obliged to provide for the in-laws, because he raised your husband to give you all the family property, because your husband must have the obligation to support his old man, and you should be my daughter-in-law.

From a legal point of view, the daughter-in-law has no obligation My father-in-law and mother-in-law provide for the elderly, but as a son, he must bear this responsibility, then you, as the other half of the family, so it is best to bear the responsibility of loving the house and Wuma, for the harmony of the family, it is reasonable to provide for the father-in-law and mother-in-law.

I don't think my in-laws have the obligation to take care of the children, and if the daughter-in-law is not obliged to provide for the in-laws, then what's the point of such a family living together? Family members help each other, so it's recommended to communicate well and improve the relationship.

How can you say that there is no obligation to support your in-laws? In this way, the son-in-law is not and does not have the obligation to support his parents-in-law, since he is married, then the responsibility and obligation of the other half is also his own obligation, and the in-laws do not take care of the children, because it has been very hard to take care of their own children since childhood, and it is illegal not to support the elderly.

The daughter-in-law does not provide for the father-in-law and mother-in-law, and the son-in-law does not provide for the father-in-law and mother-in-law.

Parents-in-law are not obliged to help take care of children, is it not obligated daughter-in-law to provide for parents-in-law and mother-in-law? Don't look at your parents-in-law who are not obliged to help you take care of the children, but as a son, you are obliged to support your in-laws.

The children should be brought by themselves, and the in-laws have no such obligation, unless they are willing to bring them, there is nothing to say, but they have an obligation to provide for the in-laws, and it is also a responsibility.

Yes, the son-in-law also has no obligation to provide for his parents-in-law, so the girl is still married.

It can be said that because the daughter-in-law still has her own parents, she has to support her parents, but if the daughter-in-law and her husband love each other very much, she may also take care of her in-laws for her husband, which is an emotion, not an obligation, and providing for the elderly for the parents and the parents to take care of the children are two different things, and cannot be substituted for each other.

It is true that the parents-in-law are not obligated to help with the children. In this case, the daughter-in-law is also not obliged to provide for her parents-in-law in old age. However, if the son must support his parents-in-law, the daughter-in-law can assist in supporting the parents-in-law. Similarly, a son-in-law has no obligation to support his father-in-law and mother-in-law.

Parents-in-law are not obligated to help take care of the children, but daughters-in-law are obligated to provide for their parents-in-law. Under normal circumstances, parents-in-law will help take care of the children, unless they have special circumstances, either their health does not allow it, or they need to go outside to earn money, each has its own difficulties, and we must be considerate of each other.

A daughter-in-law is not obliged to provide for the elderly, but a daughter-in-law cannot prevent her son from providing for his parents.