Does Chinese law stipulate that a dishonest executor loses power?

As long as the electricity bill is not owed, the judgment defaulter's electricity consumption cannot be cut off. People-oriented is the most fundamental feature of China's current law, even if he is a judgment defaulter, he must be guaranteed the most basic living conditions, and he must never be deprived of the most basic living conditions.

As far as I know, there is no relevant law, and it will not be refined to this extent, but if you owe electricity, the electricity will generally be cut off, because electricity will not be free

According to the relevant provisions of China's law, the enforcement of untrustworthy persons is mainly based on restricting high consumption, such as taking airplanes, bullet trains, and entering and exiting high-consumption places.

There is no requirement for this.

Even if the other party is untrustworthy, it is still necessary to ensure his normal life.

It is impossible to cut off water and electricity.

The untrustworthy person only restricts high consumption, and there will be no power and water cuts.

There is no such regulation, but it is stipulated that the dishonest person cannot participate in high consumption, such as high-speed rail hotel tourism.

Without this rule, everyone has to live. It's just that the power is cut off without paying the electricity bill.

There is no provision that says that judgment defaulters will lose power.

There is no such provision unless you owe money to the Electricity Board.

1.After the suspension of enforcement, it is generally the case that the rubber tremor does not belong to the untrustworthy person.

2.Where there is a need to suspend enforcement, the people's court shall rule to suspend enforcement, and after the suspension disappears, enforcement shall be resumed.

3.After the suspension of enforcement, he has a time limit for lead like socks, and the executor can still apply for enforcement, and he may still become a dishonest executor.

Legal Analysis: No. Where the person subject to enforcement is a minor, the people's court must not include them in the list of judgment defaulters.

The period for inclusion in the Judgment Defaulters List is generally two years. Where violence or threats are used to obstruct or resist the enforcement of the festival, or where there are multiple untrustworthy conduct, it may be extended for one to three years. Where the people's courts actively perform the obligations set forth in effective legal documents or actively correct untrustworthy conduct, they may delete information on untrustworthiness in advance.

Legal basis: Several Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on the Publication of Information on the List of Judgment Defaulters" Article 1: Where persons subject to enforcement fail to perform the obligations set forth in effective legal documents, and have any of the following circumstances, the people's courts shall include them in the list of judgment defaulters, and give them credit punishments in accordance with law:

1. Refusal to perform the obligations set forth in effective legal documents despite having the ability to perform;

2. Obstructing or resisting enforcement by means such as forging evidence, violence, or threats;

3. Evading enforcement by means of false litigation, false arbitration, or concealment or transfer of property;

4. Violating the property reporting system;

5. Violating the order restricting consumption;

6. Refusal to perform on the enforcement of the settlement agreement without justifiable reasons.

1. First of all, judgment defaulters and credit reporting records are matters under the jurisdiction of two different systems, with judgment defaulters under the jurisdiction of the court's judicial system, and credit reporting records under the jurisdiction of the credit reporting system of the People's Bank of China.

2. Second, credit reporting records shall be kept for 5 years from the date of termination of the negative conduct or incident, not 5 years after the court's judgment defaulter information is deleted.

3. The judicial system only has a list of judgment defaulters, and is not responsible for credit records. Persons subject to enforcement who have already completed the performance of the obligations provided for in judicial documents shall be removed from the list of judgment defaulters. In accordance with Article 9 of the Supreme People's Court's "Several Provisions on the Information on the List of Judgment Defaulters", "where citizens, legal persons, or other organizations that should not be included in the list of judgment defaulters are included in the list of judgment defaulters, the people's court shall revoke the information on untrustworthiness within three working days."

4. The credit reporting system is responsible for the preservation of credit information. In accordance with article 16 of the "Regulations on the Administration of the Credit Reporting Industry", "the period for credit reporting establishments to store negative personal information is 5 years from the date on which the negative conduct or incident is terminated; Where it is more than 5 years old, it shall be deleted. This article is the issue of the retention period of credit reporting records, and has nothing to do with whether or not they are included in the list of judgment defaulters by the court.

5. However, the people's courts shall report the information on the Judgment Defaulters List to the credit reporting establishments, and the credit reporting establishments are to record it in their credit reporting systems.