How to understand that the river rises. The creek is full of water ?

This stems from a Chinese saying: "The big river has water and the small river is full", which means that as long as the big river has water, the small river will not worry, so everyone has to desperately store water for the big river, and the small river can be put aside and left alone. A very ordinary natural phenomenon, but it hides a very paradoxical logic.

In fact, it is the water of the small river that the great river can be full, and the water of the small river does not come from the gift of the great river; On the contrary, the vitality of the great rivers comes from the confluence of thousands of small rivers. Don't you see, it is precisely because the rights of thousands of small streams near the source of the Yellow River have been ignored, violated, and desecrated that these weak and untold small rivers have died out one after another, and finally caused the great tragedy of today's mother river that has been cut off for 260 years a year?

Many times, we always easily believe in a superficial thing, take it for granted, and accept it without thinking, so people are conformist, and going with the crowd is the embodiment of human sociality. Even if you realize that it may be wrong, it will be because most people think so and do it, and then they think and do it, so there will always be a lot of absurd events in human beings, in fact, these absurd logic and events happen all the time, and they are not far away from us!

If you have more water in the big river, the more water in the small river will naturally be sprinkled, and the whole will be satisfied, and the individual will be equally satisfied.

It is about the relationship between collective interests and individual interests.

As the saying goes, "The big river is full of water, and the little river is full; The big rivers have no water, and the small rivers are dry. In the same way, only when the collective interests are rich, can the individual interests be satisfied, and if there is no collective interest, how can there be any individual interests?

Lei Feng's diary.

It means that only if the company develops well, you will have a better development platform.

You can understand that if the leader eats bones, you can drink bone broth. Ha ha.

The big ones can be there, and the small ones can be had.

I remember that tax advertisements were like this before: only if the country has it, the people will have it.

The overall quality has been improved, and the self-employment has been gained a lot.

Of course, we know that others are using this as a metaphor. It means that if the collective has it, the individual will have it; When the country is rich, the people will be rich. It seems that in their minds, the collective and the country are big rivers, while the individuals and people are small rivers.

Leaving aside the illogic view of the collective before the individual and the state before the people, it is obviously incorrect to justify this view by using the metaphor of the big river and the small river. That is to say, the metaphor used reveals the opposite of what they are trying to say. Isn't this a bit like a fool playing with fire and burning himself?

Because according to common sense, we also know that the water must flow from the small ditch and small river to the big river. In other words, the water of a large river is filled only when the water of a small river flows in, and the water of a small river comes before there is the water of a large river. If there is no small river, how can there be a big river?

If we have to explain the relationship between the two, we can only say that it is: "The small river has water and the big river is full, but the small river has no water and the big river is dry", and we must not say the other way around, saying that it is something to say: "The big river has water and the small river is full, and the big river has no water and the small river is dry".

If you really want to say that, isn't it obviously anti-logic, anti-common sense, and anti-natural? In order to prove their fallacies, they even do not hesitate to tamper with objective laws, reverse natural common sense, and turn white into black and black as white. At the same time, it also shows how stupid these people are, even when they are sophistry and nonsense, they can't even use analogies and metaphors.

For example, their purpose is to illustrate the country's first.

First, the people are second, the collective is important, the individual is light, but it is necessary to choose a metaphor of a big river and a small river. Isn't that a bit of a neuropathy, you say?

But, then again, it's a bit of a skew. We believe that although their argument about big rivers and small rivers is absurd, this metaphor of the relationship between big rivers and small rivers proves the correctness of the view that "first there is the individual, then the collective, first the people, then the state". Moreover, it has made the most vivid, vivid, and convincing proof of this view.

It seems that by simply using this metaphor of "a small river has water, a big river is full, and a small river has no water and a big river is dry", we can refute the theory that "the country is important, the people are light, and the collective is the master and the individual is secondary" to be incomplete and unreasonable. Therefore, in a certain sense, we should thank those who put forward the idea that "the big river has water and the small river is full, and the big river has no water and the small river is dry", because it is they who make us think of the fact that "the small river has water, the big river is full, and the small river has no water and the big river is dry", and then reminds us of the truth that the people are more important than the state and the individual is more important than the collective.

"The big rivers have water and the small rivers are full, but the big rivers have no water and the small rivers are dry", this slogan was 1956 nationwide"Cooperative"Later,"It came into being under the political needs of the time and soon became a classic metaphor in rural socialist education".

A metaphor for the connection between the collective and the individual. The collective is like a big river, and the individual is like a small river. The strength of the collective is strong, and everyone in the collective is relatively wealthy; If the strength of the collective decays and collapses, and the individuals in the collective have no income.

This is a principle of life.

The meaning of "a small river with water and a big river is full, and a big river without water is dry for a small river" is that the former sentence emphasizes joint efforts, contributions, and participation, and the latter sentence emphasizes distribution, enjoyment, and domination. The amount of contribution and participation determines the amount of distribution and enjoyment later. It can be seen that these two sentences do not contradict each other, but are opposed to each other and unify the dialectical relationship, but the artistic conception of the representatives is different.

In the previous sentence, the small river has water because of it, and the big river is full of fruits. The original meaning refers to a trickle and convergence into a river, which is a metaphor for the wealth of the common people, the strength of the individual, and the contribution of the individual, so the collective strength will be strong together.

The latter sentence is the cause of the lack of water in the big river, and the dry nature of the small river is the effect. The original meaning means that when the big river runs out of water, the small river will inevitably dry up. The metaphor is that when the collective power is weakened and the collective benefits are gone, then the individual strength will be weak, and the individual benefits will be gone.

Social wealth is created by the masses of the people, and part of the wealth is controlled by the state on behalf of the people, and part of it is controlled by the people themselves. We often say, "A big river is full of water, a small river is full, and a big river is dry without water", and on the other hand, a small river can be full when there is water, and a big river can be dry if there is no water. Only when the wealth of the state and individuals has increased can the country become strong and prosperous, and can it better meet the growing material and cultural needs of the masses of the people.

A big river is full of water, and a small river is full, and a big river is dry without water, an ancient Chinese folk proverb that vividly expresses the relationship between large rivers and small rivers, while also reflecting the delicate balance between them. From the proverb itself, it means that when the water level in a large river rises, the amount of water in the small river increases, and when the water level in the large river drops, the small river becomes dry. Considering the connection between the big river and the small river, we can see many elements through this proverb.

This sentence can be understood as "the big river can meet the needs of the small river when it has water, but the small river itself cannot have a continuous flow of water, and only under the supply of the big river can the small river nourish and grow." In this metaphor, the interdependence between everyone is clearly expressed, the big river is the main leader of the small river, and the small river depends on the water source of the big river to exist.

In social life, the big river can refer to a strong country and a strong group, while the small river represents the weak and helpless individuals or groups in the society. In a normal society, strong countries and groups should have enough resources to nourish those weak individuals and groups, so that they have enough space to survive and develop. It is through this interconnectedness that strong nations and groups are able to flourish and societies become more stable and prosperous.

But there is also a certain risk and danger in this sentence. Small rivers depend on the water of large rivers, but large rivers do not always have sufficient water** Small rivers. If the big river dries up, the small river may dry up as well.

In the same way, in reality, small groups and individuals depend on powerful states and groups, and once powerful states and groups fall into crisis, small groups and individuals may lose the basis for their survival and development. Therefore, the proverb also reminds us that although we are interdependent, we also need a certain degree of balance and a moderate degree of independence to avoid the risks and dangers that come with interdependence.

In short, "the big river is full of water and the small river is full, and the big river is dry without water" is a vivid and vivid folk proverb, which is a profound concept of interdependence, mutual support and mutual responsibility between people. The development and progress of society requires mutual support and interdependence between individuals and groups. But at the same time, small groups and individuals must also have their own independence and self-sustaining ability to manage Gyeongsan in order to achieve their own growth and all-round progress.