What to do if the grain is cheap and hurts the peasants, what is the next sentence of the grain and

The idea is simple: farmers don't make money growing grain, so they will naturally go to other industries to work for high incomes. But in ancient times, the migration of peasants was illegal, and the trade could hardly be changed. Therefore, the situation of grain cheapness and injury to peasants is determined by the system that it is impossible to solve.

The institutional obstacle in contemporary China in this regard is the urban-rural duality.

We can learn from the United States to provide subsidies to agricultural laborers, and at the same time carry out the consolidation and integration of agricultural planting, reduce the number of growers, expand the scale, and improve the level of mechanization, so as to reduce costs and increase profits. However, China's surplus labor force is a big problem, which can strengthen the development of agricultural and sideline products processing enterprises, increase the added value of agricultural products and expand the demand for agricultural products, thereby promoting the increase of agricultural products, and at the same time absorb the surplus labor transferred from the agricultural sector.

In order to stabilize prices, the state has carried out a policy of suppressing grain prices and subsidized enterprises that use large quantities. I think that since the state can give subsidies to grain enterprises, why can't it also give some subsidies to farmers, mainly not to suppress them, but to increase support and encourage consumption.

Establish a minimum protective price for grain purchases, and plant abroad with a high level of mechanization and technology, and farmers can get a lot of subsidies from the state. It is best to link China's grain prices with world food prices, which is obviously not conducive to China's food security and social stability. Therefore, the method of minimum purchase price is adopted.

It means that if the grain is high, the farmer will sell the grain, and he will starve; If the grain is low, it will hurt the enthusiasm of farmers to plant grain.

It is a classic problem of economics that the grain is cheap and hurts the peasants. The traditional view is that the profit that farmers get from ** grain depends on two factors: output (q) and grain price (p), and profit is the product of the two; However, these two variables are not independent, but are interrelated, and their correlation is determined by a downward sloping line of demand for food, and the two are negatively correlated.

Response

The first is the support and protection of the first, the current direct subsidy of grain, comprehensive subsidies for agricultural materials, subsidies for agricultural machinery, the minimum protective price of grain, the development of agricultural policy insurance, etc.

the second is to develop characteristic agriculture; Generally speaking, intervening in the grain market is the mainstream opinion in China, but this is not conducive to the healthy development of China's grain industry in the long run.

The real key question is how to maintain the efficient functioning of the food market. Only a well-developed market is in the best interest of all parties, whether farmers, consumers or intermediaries. In terms of protecting and realizing the interests of farmers, farmers' cooperatives are organized.

is the way to achieve it. One of the essential differences between cooperatives and corporations is that the profits obtained are returned to the farmers according to the transaction amount.

The high price of grain is not good for the people of the people, and the low price of grain is harmful to the farmers, so it is necessary to take into account the interests of both the farmers and the people of the people.

by Li Kui, 400 BC, was a politician of the Wei State in the early Warring States period.

It is a classic problem of economics that the grain is cheap and hurts the peasants. How much a farmer can sell his grain after harvesting depends on two factors: the output and the price of grain, which are the product of the two.

But these two variables are not independent, but are interrelated, and their correlation is determined by a downward sloping line of demand for food. That is, the lower the demand, the greater the demand; **The higher it is, the less demand it will have. It should also be noted that the food demand line lacks elasticity, that is, the demand is not very sensitive to changes in **.

When the price of food is **, the demand for food increases, but not by much. The basic truth lies in the fact that food is a necessity, and the demand for food is mainly determined by the physiological demand for food. In addition, the proportion of food spent on food is now small and will continue to grow for most people, making people insensitive to changes in food prices.

After understanding this characteristic of the grain market, it is not difficult to understand the following phenomenon: When grain production increases by a large margin, peasants can only compete to reduce prices in order to sell the grain in their hands. However, due to the lack of elasticity of grain demand, farmers can only sell their grain after a significant reduction in grain prices, which means that grain prices are often large when grain is harvested.

If the percentage of grain prices exceeds the percentage increase in grain production, there will be a situation in which the increase in output does not increase or even decreases the income.

Therefore, it will generally support the development of agriculture, increase grain prices, purchase surplus grain, and then increase farmers' incomes.

Regarding the issue of the economy, it is necessary to pay attention and think about it constantly, and it is recommended to go to a **, which will definitely help.

This year is another good year of bumper harvest and bumper harvest, and the grain market is more than the previous year. But food **** has also caused widespread concern about food security in society. Ensuring the stability of grain prices and getting out of the vicious circle of "cheap grain hurting peasants and expensive rice hurting the people" is of great importance to ensuring national food security.

The proportion of market-oriented acquisitions continues to increase.

Since the autumn grain went on the market, the grain market has been hot, and the continuous rise has made many farmers reluctant to sell. At present, the grain tends to be stable, with the current market to sell grain, planting income is better, more and more farmers change the mentality of reluctance to sell, began to actively sell grain cash, the northeast and other major producing areas of corn, rice, soybeans have begun to increase. According to the data of the State Food and Material Reserves Administration, as of October 31, the enterprises in the main producing areas had purchased a total of 21.63 million tons of autumn grain, an increase of 950,000 tons year-on-year.

Farmers should try their best to achieve a balanced and orderly sale of grain, neither blindly cover up grain and reluctant to sell, nor pile up to sell grain, and avoid centralized grain sales. The grain that has not been ** should be ventilated off the ground, and go upstairs and stacks to avoid losses caused by mildew.

"Grain cheapness hurts peasants" refers to the phenomenon that when the wind and rain are good, the peasants' grain income increases, but grain prices fall, and the income from selling grain is lower than in previous years.

1) The fundamental reason for the phenomenon of "grain cheapness hurting farmers" is that agricultural products are often commodities that lack demand elasticity.

Under the effect of the inelastic demand curve, the equilibrium ** of agricultural products decreases from P1 to P2, and the equilibrium quantity rises from Q1 to Q2. Because the decline in the equilibrium of agricultural products was greater than the increase in the equilibrium quantity of agricultural products, the total income of peasants was finally reduced. The decrease in total revenue is equal to the difference between the areas of the rectangles op1e1q1 and op2e2q2 in the figure.

2) The role that can be played in the field of agriculture.

Because agricultural products are inelastic commodities, the harvest of agricultural products will reduce the income of farmers, which will reduce the enthusiasm of farmers to produce, so it is necessary to take measures to ensure the income of farmers

**Protective price acquisition. That is, in the agricultural harvest, in order to avoid a sharp decline, the purchase protection price of agricultural products is set, which ensures that farmers can use higher agricultural products, so that the farmers can also obtain higher income when the agricultural products are harvested, and ensure the enthusiasm of farmers in production.

Subsidies for agricultural production. ** It can take the form of direct subsidies to provide financial subsidies to farmers who carry out agricultural production, which substantially reduces the cost of agricultural production. Farmers will not lose their income because of a bumper harvest of agricultural products, which ensures that farmers are motivated to produce.

1."Cheap grain hurts peasants" and a bumper grain harvest will actually bring about a decline in peasants' incomes, and this is a phenomenon in which the amount of grain harvested by the peasants increases, but the income from selling grain decreases. The economic logic is that when other conditions remain constant, the bumper grain harvest will cause the grain ** to decline, and the degree of grain ** decline is greater than the increase in grain production and land infiltration.

2.Economic Analysis of "Grain Cheapness Hurts Farmers" - The fundamental reason for this is that agricultural products are often commodities with elastic demand, illustrated by the following figure.

The demand curve D for agricultural products in the figure is inelastic. The bumper harvest of agricultural products shifts the supply curve from the S seat to the right to the S'Under the effect of the demand curve lacking demand elasticity, the moral equilibrium of agricultural products has decreased from P1 to P2 by a large margin. Because the decline in the equilibrium of agricultural products is greater than the increase in the equilibrium quantity of agricultural products, it finally leads to a decrease in the total income of farmers, and the decrease in total income is equivalent to the difference between the area of the rectangular OP1E1Q1 and OP2E2Q2.