Behind the tide of rent surrender, why do peasants prefer wasteland to large enterprises?

Behind the wave of rent withdrawals, why do farmers prefer to leave their land barren rather than transfer it to large enterprises? On the one hand, it is because many peasants simply do not know that it can be transferred to large enterprises, and some peasants do not trust large enterprises enough and dare not transfer them to large enterprises. In addition, there are also some customs influences, such as some farmers think that their own land should be kept for themselves, and if it is given to others, it is equivalent to betraying their ancestors, etc., which will be explained to you in detail below.

1.Many people don't know that land can be transferred to big businesses.

There is an information gap in this, for some places, everyone may know that their land can be transferred to large enterprises, but there are many farmers, and some places may not know that there is this news at all, so some people go out to work, even if the land is barren, they will not transfer the land to large enterprises. <>

2.Many people don't dare to believe in big business, and they believe in their own people even more.

After all, large enterprises are outsiders, and for rural people, they believe more in their own village and the people around them, and dare not trust these outsiders. I don't understand contracts and the like at all, and I transfer the land to large enterprises in a timely manner, and I can't make hundreds of dollars a year, so I don't take this risk. <>

3.Some peasants are afraid of trouble, so they don't want to transfer their land to big enterprises.

If you want to transfer land to large enterprises, it is inevitable to sign contracts and the like, and some contracts are more than ten years. There are a lot of processes that need to be experienced in the middle, and for farmers, they can't make much money by transferring land, and it's so troublesome, so many farmers don't choose to transfer land to large enterprises.

All in all, the reason why many peasants prefer to leave their land deserted rather than transfer large enterprises may be because they simply do not know that they can transfer large enterprises. It is also possible that they do not trust these outsiders, and in addition to that, they are afraid of trouble, they do not make much money themselves, and they may take more risks.

Because the annual wages of large enterprises in rural areas are very small, but the work is very tiring, even more tiring than farming in rural areas, but the wages are not as much as farming, so they do not want to go to work.

After the lease was surrendered, the land received by the farmers themselves was already rambling and barren for a long time, which was not very suitable for planting, and if it was to be planted, the cost of planting would be higher.

Because of the current prevalence, it is easy to transfer land and it is difficult to get it back, and it is as easy to get the land back as it is to transfer it out, and we should not hinder the peasants' right to get the land back just because it is convenient for enterprises to manage.

Because the peasants see that the land will be higher in the future, and the benefits given to the large enterprises that are now transferred are not satisfactory, the peasants would rather waste land than large enterprises.

Pay the rent first, the contract is notarized or notarized, and the people are not afraid! As long as you give the money first and then hand over the land.

Because the circulation of this matter is not a simple few acres of land, in addition to rent, but also machinery and equipment and other expenditures, the investment is very large, and there is no agreement between enterprises and farmers, and there will be trouble in the future.

My family's 60 acres of land are waiting to be paid to quit, I work outside for a month, more than 13,000 land, basically for the neighbors to plant, the year before last to go back to see a good guy is too panicked, and then I didn't go out to work, I'm afraid that I will go back in two years, Artemisia is higher than the house.

Land circulation is an empty glove white wolf. If you go out, you will bear the consequences. Once the land is transferred, it is impossible to confirm the rights. Decades later, the old one died, and the younger one didn't even know where his home was.

Farmers are more conservative in their thinking, and they need to be patient to explain and revitalize the new countryside so that farmers can change their thinking.

The circulation to large enterprises is not independent, the original circulation income is not much, as long as you do it yourself, the annual income is at least 2 times that of the circulation.

If the rent is not paid, the land will not be paid. It's better to let it be deserted

The peasant mentality and consciousness that the gold in the hand is not as good as the copper in the hand.

Grow a little and eat it yourself? Turned? What do we eat?

Yes, no one wants to make money, and no one wants to do something that doesn't make money. Now agricultural products are cheap, agricultural products are expensive, and large farmers may not make money, so they all surrender the land to rent.

Yes. Because of the impact of natural disasters in recent years, the crop harvest has become worse and worse, resulting in the economic level of the peasants getting worse and worse.

Yes, because now many farmers are starting to stop farming.

Yes, so many young people in rural areas have gone out to work, leaving behind some elderly people at home, and the prospects for farming are getting worse and worse.

The wave of returnees has ended, and there has been a large-scale wave of rent surrenders in the countryside. A lot of people don'tRent seedsland too

Our country has a large population and complex terrain, although everyone is allocated land according to the number of acres

According to the corn that is very common in the north, seeds, fertilizers, pesticides, and then add some labor time costs, one acre of land may earn hundreds of dollars

However, the current market environment makes people feel that no matter how much effort they put in, they can't make too much money by planting land, but they spend time and energy in vain, and people naturally choose to give up, rent land on a large scale, and choose to work in the city.

As soon as the "wave of returning to the hometown" ended, there was another "wave of rent surrender" in the countryside, so why did the big contractors quit?

In our cognition, large land contractors have always been very profitable, why are many people reluctant to do it now?

Because the surrender of the lease will cause many large contractors to suffer great losses, so these large contractors are unwilling to do this.

Contractors come to contract fields to make money, but now a lot of grain grown in rural areas is not high, and there are risks, resulting in large contractors not wanting to do it.

A household signed a contract with several cities, corn cob for 4 yuan**, rented 400 acres of land, rent 400 acres, hired people to plant corn, the result of the cob planted is big, small, old, some too tender, not much in line with the supermarket standards, plus freight, labor compensation.

Why don't you do it, because, worry, bother, and exert your strength. Not only did he not make money, but he also lost a lot of money. It's sad for a year. There are no preferential conditions. Who's going to do it. If you don't retreat, what do you keep for?

Because of this year's epidemic, it is too serious, so the wave of returning to the hometown has just ended, and there is a wave of rent surrender in the countryside.

Teacher Ye Shengtao was very prescient, and he wrote more than three or five buckets now, more than half a century, Ye Lao is really amazing.

They are all doing business at a loss, and the principal is gone, so how can the big rural planters continue to go down, and what do they do, of course, it is better to choose not to do it.

Opportunists shouldn't be able to make money!

There are a lot of big contractors, and it's obviously too stupid.

Demand for higher import tariffs on agricultural products!!

Food prices are low, agricultural materials are expensive, agricultural infrastructure is lacking, and whoever rents loses money

In fact, sometimes those people who contract a large area of land every year also bear a lot of risk, if this year's harvest is not good, they have to pay for some of the contracted land, sometimes they may not be able to bear such a big pressure in their hearts, and naturally they are unwilling to contract these land. In fact, when they do something, as long as they can stick to it, and then add a national policy, I think it's still very good.

Contractors can't make money, no one can do it, this is the current market**.

The capital chain is broken, which relies on subsidies and loans to set up funds to run agricultural land, it does not rely on the land to grow crops to make money, but only uses it to cheat money, and when it can't be cheated, it will naturally give up.

The reason why large-scale planting does not make money, the cost of agricultural machinery and labor is too high, and the crops are not valuable, which leads to the reason that land contracting does not make money, and even pays on credit.

Because there is too much money invested and a lot of labor is needed, the profit of profitability is simply not enough for the cost.

Many contractors come to contract the soil with a kind of wealth in mind, and there are not many who really know how to plant and can find the best of the best. Many people will choose some cash crops, but these crops are often unstable in the market, and as long as the market falls more, these large-scale planters will lose money. As a result, some people who followed the trend of contracting quit the lease after two years.

The main reason for quitting is that you don't make money, and then there is that the expenses of workers are too big, and you have to pay for it, so you have no choice but not to do it.

As soon as the "wave of returning to the hometown" ended, there was another "wave of rent surrender" in the countryside, so why did the big contractors quit?