Musk said that Apple s advertising commission is too high, is Apple s commission reasonable?

The charging policy is very unreasonable, and it will also cause bad harm to others, so it should be subject to certain sanctions.

Apple App Store.

The charging policy is an obvious overlord clause.

Despite many applications.

Developers are strongly unhappy about this, but many have had to choose to pay a commission accordingly. For those apps that are launched on the Apple App Store, app developers are required to pay a certain percentage of the Apple tax, which can even reach 30%. In this case, many countries and regions have expressed strong dissatisfaction with Apple and issued corresponding fines to Apple.

Many public figures.

It also said that Apple should not charge for the so-called I sleep. <>

Elon Musk. said that Apple's apple tax belongs to the Internet Global Tax. As for his personal opinion on the Apple tax, he believes that Apple should not collect commissions from the Apple App Store, because the essence of such commissions is that Apple taxes taxes on the global Internet.

At the same time, Musk believes that Apple.

The proportion of the apple tax levied is too high, and the actual tax rate may only be about 10% of the apple tax. The charging policy that the Apple App Store knows is meaningless. This is mainly due to the fact that no system collects commissions from app stores, only Apple does. <>

At the same time, Apple's actions will cause many small and medium-sized app developers to struggle to make ends meet. The so-called Apple App Store fee deduction itself belongs to the forced purchase and compulsory ** of Apple, which is not recognized by most app developers. <

For those apps that are launched on the Apple Store, the developers of the apps not only have to bear the corresponding development costs, but also pay a certain commission for the duration of the use of 100 users. Although Apple believes that this behavior can help the Apple Store screen apps, many people do not approve of this model, and even some regional markets have directly issued corresponding fines to Apple.

I don't think Apple will compromise the basic rights of consumers, especially excessive withdrawals from consumers. Science and technology are constantly advancing, especially in our daily lives, and the progress of science and technology can bring many benefits. However, we can also find that with some technology products, we often pay a lot of price, but for the average consumer, the cost of using technology products is high, but it will have a big impact on our lives.

Musk said that Apple is worried: the increase in advertising, advertising is too expensive.

In an interview, Musk talked about Apple's development prospects and said that Apple's development prospects are worrying. Musk made this point based on an agreement between Apple and software collaborators. Musk believes that Apple has increased their improper payments from advertising.

In particular, the increase in the financial burden on advertisers may directly lead to the cancellation of relevant cooperation between advertisers and Apple. Apple's development and progress are useless.

It will not hurt the consumer.

Especially for Apple users, we buy the same items as Android users, and Apple users should spend more money. This directly leads to a very unfair situation for Apple users, and in essence, their most basic rights and interests are compromised. Consumer.

It is completely unreasonable for Apple to unilaterally impose high fees on software.

The following developments should be taken into account.

So, given the upcoming developments, I don't think Apple will be able to overcharge unilateral advertising and software producers. More importantly, consider the real-life experience of Apple users. Excessive software mining can lead to disgust with Apple users, and Apple's future development will bring huge obstacles.

I think we should have the same agreement with Android phones and charge the same fees.

Musk expressed his doubts about this, and Apple does take a high commission for advertising. The next step will be made by the market regulator to make reasonable rectifications.

Apple's main profit point is to give users a good experience in some of its features.

Apple's main profit point is its brand awareness, and some of its configurations are very smooth.

This is very unfair to the Internet industry, because it directly means that Apple charges 30% tax on the Internet industry.

For Apple, Apple's Apple Store is indeed very secure, but it also has a certain degree of closure, and Apple will also be responsible for its own Apple Store. For users, users naturally like the security of the Apple Store, but this is not enough to justify the Apple Store charging a 30% tax on app developers. To some extent, this 30% tax is not conducive to the development of the Internet industry.

Musk expressed his opinion about the 30% commission charged by the Apple Store.

For Musk, Musk believes that Apple should not charge up to 30% of the app commission, because this behavior is not conducive to the ecological development of the Apple Store, and there are also suggestions that the rights and interests of app developers are infringed. Musk believes that this kind of behavior is very unfair to the Internet industry, because this behavior is like charging a 30% tax on the Internet industry, but a company is not qualified to collect taxes from Internet companies at all. <>

This is very unfair to the Internet industry.

The reason for this is that only Apple will do so as long as it is because other companies do not charge app developers such a harvest. For Apple, Apple said that this method can further ensure the safety of users, but the app developer does not need to pay for this behavior, which is equivalent to the exploitation of the Internet industry. <>

What is my personal opinion?

In my personal opinion, the Apple system does have a certain amount of security, but there is no reason for Apple to directly charge a high commission of 30% to app developers. Especially for those small and medium-sized developers, the apps developed by developers are not profitable in themselves, and Apple's actions will further stifle the development enthusiasm of many app developers, and I personally think that Apple should ban this commission model. <>

It is very unfair because the profits of the Internet industry are low, and Apple is closed, and the profit margin is lower, so it is unfair to the industry.

This approach is too unfair to the Internet, so it is very unfavorable to the development of the whole and **, so in the future, other people's business difficulties will not be able to continue to do it.

Such an approach is particularly unfair to the Internet industry, and it is also particularly unreasonable, and should be resisted.

I agree. Because Apple's payment for Congda services has always been relatively expensive, and has formed a serious monopoly in the market, it has become a serious impact on other industries, and their economic return is very high, which has exceeded the basic market regulations, so Musk's statement is also correct.

Approval. It is particularly correct, and there must be some basis and evidence to prove it, so I very much agree with this person's statement, and I think it is very correct to say that the reputation is very correct.

That's true, and I agree with it, and I feel like it's really super reasonable. It's a very good practice.

Apple's recent planning for advertising is a little incomprehensible, and it has begun to go further and further in the principle of making money without a bottom line.

Even Elon Musk, the richest man, thinks that Apple is a bit excessive, not only adding a round of advertising in the system, but also taking a 30% advertising cut on social **.

A few days ago, Apple just announced a new payment policy, requiring users and advertisers to use Apple's "in-app purchase" channel when buying "promoted" posts on social media such as Instagram, and charge up to 30% commission from it.

Musk thinks the commission is a bit too high.

It is reported that in the past month, Apple has rejected Spotify's app three times, saying that its newly launched audiobooks violate Apple's rules on "how developers can communicate with customers about ** purchases".

Spotify said that this process not only hurts consumers, but also authors and publishers, who are completely suppressed by Apple.

Spotify founder Daniel Eck said, "Nothing will change if decision-makers don't take action." There's no way I'm the only one who sees such a ridiculous act. ”

Subsequently, Musk replied to Ek's post, saying: "(Apple) is worrying. ”