Which of the following countries has the strongest populistic ideology?

Updated on society 2024-06-04
8 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    Well, that's the country, choose A

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    Summary. The people-oriented ideology ultimately established a core value in traditional Chinese political culture: people-oriented.

    This ideology asserts that political power should serve the people and that the political system should conform to the needs and interests of the people. The people-oriented thought has a long tradition in Chinese history, as early as the Warring States Period in the "Mencius" has put forward the idea that "the people are precious, the community is secondary, and the monarch is light".

    The people-oriented thought finally established a core value in the traditional Chinese political culture: people-oriented. This ideology asserts that political power should serve the people and that the political system should conform to the needs and interests of the people.

    The people-oriented thought has a long tradition in Chinese history, as early as the Warring States Period, the idea of "the people are precious, the society is secondary, and the monarch is light" has been put forward in the "Hengwei and Mencius".

    What is the sign of the final establishment of people-oriented thought?

    The symbol of the final establishment of people-oriented thought is the concept of "unity of knowledge and action" put forward by the Ming Dynasty thinker Wang Yangming. He believes that only by combining theory and practice can he truly understand the true meaning of life and realize the harmonious development of personal scale and society. This philosophy is still widely used today in education, leadership, and relationships.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    Humanism and democracy are only superficially similar, but they are fundamentally different in substance. 62616964757a686964616fe78988e69d8331333337613233

    First of all, in terms of the origin of the monarch and the people, the vast majority of Chinese people-oriented thinkers believe that the relationship between the monarch and the people is predetermined, and only a very few believe that the king should be freely elected by the people or otherwise elected from among the people. The vast majority of democrats in the West, on the other hand, believe that rulers are born from the people and should be produced by the people through contracts.

    Second, although traditional Chinese people-oriented thinkers generally believe that the monarch is set up for the people, it is to "appease the people" and "support the people". But this kind of soothing the people is the duty of heaven to the king. Therefore, the king is accountable first to the heavens, not to the people.

    In contrast, Western democrats advocate "by the people, by the people, and for the people", believing that the ruler should be responsible to the people first.

    Third, Chinese people-oriented thinkers emphasize that the people are the basic elements that make up the state, and this is mainly from the perspective of political rule. In other words, without the people, the ruler not only cannot rule, but also cannot guarantee his own food, clothing, shelter and personal safety. When Western democratic thinkers say that the people are the constituent elements of the state, their main focus is on the natural composition of the state, that is, the state must have the three basic elements of land, population and sovereignty to become a state.

    Finally, the fundamental difference between nationalism and democracy is that the former presupposes that sovereignty rests with the monarch, while the latter assumes that sovereignty resides with the people. When the populists regard the people as the foundation of the state, they presuppose that the people are the objects of the king's rule, and without them there would be no king's rule. The people are the foundation of the whole body of government, and the king is the sovereign of this body of government.

    Western democratic thinkers not only emphasize that the people are the foundation of national politics, but also emphasize that the sovereignty of political rule lies with the people, not with the king.

    The idea of people-oriented and the idea of democracy are not only substantively different, but also fundamentally opposite. Traditional Chinese people-oriented thinkers often emphasize the "people-oriented" at the same time as the "monarch". Therefore, in terms of its ideological essence, the traditional Chinese people-oriented is also a monarchist.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    The people-oriented thinking is people-oriented, which means that the interests of the people are the priority in everything, and it is not involved in who makes decisions.

    The idea of democracy refers to the decision-making of the people, but whether the people's decision-making is people-oriented or not is not involved.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    "Democratic thinking.

    "Plagiarism" is a cultural product of modern capitalist society. In legal theory, it opposes the feudal hierarchy and pays attention to the equality of everyone. Politically, it denied the "power of the monarch and the gods", emphasized that only the people are the real "masters" of the country, and demanded that the people participate in the political affairs of the country.

    "People-oriented thought" and "democratic thought" are only similar in words, but their essential meanings are different.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    What our teacher is talking about is people-oriented thinking, the subject is the monarch, and the monarch is the master. Humanistic thought is similar to humanism, in that people are the main language and the people are the masters. The ideas of Confucius and Mencius are both people-oriented ideas.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    The people-oriented thought is centered on the interests of the people, and the people-oriented thought is people-oriented, the difference is that the people-oriented emphasizes the whole, the happiness of most people is happiness, the people-oriented emphasizes the individual, and the happiness of the individual is the happiness of all people.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    There is basically no difference between people-oriented, people-oriented, and the governing philosophy of those in power

Related questions
14 answers2024-06-04

Mazda Mazda2: Average.

Authentic Japanese products! Mazda is a good choice if it is a cheap scooter, lightweight, fuel-efficient, cost-effective and good, but if the workmanship and quality requirements of the car are higher, all Japanese cars are not recommended, you can consider American and German cars, I hope it will help you! >>>More

5 answers2024-06-04

is the native language of the United Kingdom.

English is one of the working languages of the United Nations and the de facto language of international communication. English belongs to the Indo-European family of Middle Germanic languages. >>>More

4 answers2024-06-04

1. Deepen understanding and establish a new concept of "benefiting the people and protecting the police". >>>More

6 answers2024-06-04

Use the Yangtze River to compare the life process of the nation; >>>More

5 answers2024-06-04

Known as "the last representative of German classical literature", Heine was born into a Jewish family in Düsseldorf am Rhine, Germany, and spent his childhood and adolescence in the Napoleonic Wars, studying finance and law. >>>More