Does Internet Freedom Take Precedence over Internet Control? 5

The novelty of the issue of freedom of expression on the Internet lies in the extent to which the differences between the Internet and the "traditional speech environment" caused by its technical and structural characteristics will revise or change the existing principles and rules, but the constant theme will always be a reasonable balance between the protection of rights and the governance of the Internet.

The issue of freedom of expression on the Internet is also a question of the constitutionality of the laws and measures taken to regulate and regulate the Internet for various reasons -- public interest, governance objectives, inherent functions, etc. Rights are not absolute, but the limits of rights tolerated by the Constitution must be carefully designed and reasoned. Other principles also include that the rights that can be restricted or not restricted should be unrestricted as much as possible, that when speech conflicts with other equally important acts, rights should prevail, and that the market for speech should be adjusted by means other than intervention (such as market discretion and self-regulation, updating of technical means, etc.).

The Internet is growing so rapidly that it is too early to tell whether it is sufficient to lead to the emergence of an independent legal department. However, it is undeniable that the Internet has profoundly changed the structure of freedom of speech, and therefore has also changed the status and appearance of the right to freedom of expression in the face of public power or other de facto authorities, which will inevitably affect the meaning and application of the existing principles and rules of freedom of expression, which deserve continuous observation and study.

As long as the real-name system is real, there is no restriction

Speak freely about the person you associate with, and say whatever you want without being restricted! But don't rely on the network, although it can help us solve some problems in our daily life and solve some troubles, but after all, the network is hidden, virtual, and somewhat unreal, so don't rely too much on the network.

What do you want to play? That's the greatest freedom.

To put it simply, freedom of communication on the Internet refers to the free flow of information in cyberspace.

The so-called restraint is the only way to be free. Although it is said that the Internet has turned the earth into a global village, it is not possible to spread it arbitrarily on the Internet. In particular, China's network control is relatively strict with Western countries, so it can only be called freedom of network communication within the scope of constraints.

Freedom of dissemination within the provisions of the law.

Everything in the world is a lie, whether it is the law or the rules! This is even more true in politics. There are only a few people who really think it's fair.

There is nothing inherently fair or unfair in the world. Look at Afghanistan? Look at Iraq?

Look at the luxurious life of those rich people, and look at the common people who worry about a meal. That's human nature. Don't take everything too seriously.

So! Online speech should be free, this is the truest human being.

The relevant laws on online speech are:

1. Article 221 of the Criminal Law stipulates that whoever fabricates and disseminates false facts, harms the commercial reputation or reputation of others, causes major losses to others, or has other serious circumstances, shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than two years or short-term detention and/or a fine.

2. Article 246 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates: "Whoever openly insults others or fabricates facts to slander others by violence or other means, and the circumstances are serious, shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, short-term detention, controlled release, or deprivation of political rights."

In any of the following circumstances, it shall be found to be "serious circumstances" as provided for in the first paragraph of Criminal Law article 246:

1) The same defamatory information has actually been clicked on or viewed 5,000 or more times, or has been ** 500 times or more;

2) Causing serious consequences such as mental disorders, self-harm, or suicide to the victim or their close relatives;

3) Those who have received an administrative punishment for defamation within two years, and who also slander others; (4) Other situations where the circumstances are serious;

In addition, where the use of information networks to defame others is carried out multiple times within one year without being addressed, and the defamatory information is actually clicked, viewed, or counted cumulatively to constitute a crime, it shall be convicted and punished in accordance with law.

Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Civil Dispute Cases of Infringement of the Right of Information Network Transmission

Article 36 of the Tort Liability Law provides for online infringement.

Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of International Networking of Computer Information Networks

Measures for the Administration of Internet Information Services

Provisions on the Administration of Internet Electronic Bulletin Services".

It stipulates the boundaries of online freedom of expression and the remedies for online infringement.

Of course, there is a legal basis, and if there is an improper law, it is expected that criminal liability will be born.

A new one about defamation is that the number of views reached 5000 ** 500, and there is no special legal provision for the Internet, because it is difficult to determine the jurisdiction and a series of issues such as proof.