In Su Xun s On the Passage of Qin , why do you say assassins can t do it ?

Updated on culture 2024-06-11
29 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    If you look at the historical records, you know that Jing Ke is included in the biography, which shows that Taishi Gong has a high opinion of him.

    It's just that in terms of purpose and results, the operation was a failure.

    Instead of saving the fate of Yan, it hastened his demise.

    I understand that Su Xun wanted to rely on the methods of internal affairs and diplomacy, rather than the extreme means of assassins.

    Emotionally speaking, the assassination of the King of Qin is a feat and a fame at home, but when it comes to politics, there will not be so many feelings.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    No, Su Xun didn't mean to belittle Jing Ke.

    I think what Su Xun expressed is that if Jing Ke had not assassinated Qin, the excellent generals would not have died one after another because of discord between ...... countriesThe Six Kingdoms were still able to defeat the Qin State. The assassination of Qin must have made the King of Qin quite angry. The defeat of Jing Ke's assassination of Qin hastened the destruction of the Six Kingdoms by Qin.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    That's not what it means.

    And it should be the Six Kingdoms.

    To make the three kingdoms love their own land, Qi people do not attach to Qin, assassins are not good, good generals are still there, then the number of victories and defeats, the reason for survival, should be compared with Qin, or not easy to measure. "

    Translation: Previously, if the three countries each cherished their land, the people of Qi were not attached to Qin, the assassins did not act, and the good generals were still there, then the fate of victory and defeat, and the truth of survival, if compared with Qin, may not be easy to judge.

    It means that the assassin did not go to assassinate the King of Qin.

    And when it is: if, if it means.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Jing Ke's assassination of Qin was a political mistake (mainly the impulse of the decision-makers), and if it had not been for this move that angered the Qin king, there might have been other ways to defend the country.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Have you ever seen a hero??? The answer is in the heroes, please find it yourself.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    ...Su Xun never wrote the Theory of Qin, he wrote the Theory of the Six Kingdoms, and the Theory of the Qin Dynasty was written by Jia Yi, and Su Xun's point of view is that the disadvantage is to bribe Qin, that is, to exchange land for time.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Dan, the crown prince of Yan State, did not instruct Jing Ke to assassinate the King of Qin, and Li Mu, an excellent general of Zhao State, was not slandered and was killed.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Because none of the other three assassins were famous. Do you still remember a text we recited before, "Tang Ju Lives Up to His Mission"? There is a passage in this that mentions the three assassins except Jing Ke:

    The assassin of the prince is also, and the comet strikes the moon; Nie Zhengzhi's stabbing Han puppet also, white rainbow through the sun; To leave the thorn Qingji, the eagle struck the palace. ”

    Look at the characters in this, how many do you know, who is the king? Who is Han Puppet? Who is Qingji?

    Have you heard of it? I think most of you have heard this name for the first time. As for Jing Ke's assassination target, it was Qin Shi Huang, although he was still a Qin king at the time, but it did not affect the household name of later generations.

    And later, in order to promote Jing Ke's heroic image, in various movies and TV series, the plot of Jing Ke's assassination of King Qin was filmed, and the assassination of the other three assassins was rarely reflected in film and television dramas, so it is normal for ordinary people not to know.

    As for the failure of Jing Ke's assassination, it is not because Jing Ke's ability is weak, in addition to the lack of preparation, inconsiderate consideration, and the fact that King Qin is too witty, the important point is that the purpose of his assassination is not clear. Did Prince Dan want Jing Ke to stab King Qin to death at that time, or kidnap King Qin? I think from what Jing Ke said before he died, it seems that the purpose of Prince Dan should be to kidnap King Qin.

    After all, Prince Dan knew that killing King Qin alone could not stop Qin's ambition to destroy Yan. His original intention may have been to kidnap the king of Qin and then force the king of Qin to sign a treaty with him. This may be the reason why Jing Ke couldn't catch up with King Qin at that time, but he didn't shoot King Qin with the bayonet in his hand.

    Because he still wants to keep the living King of Qin and sign a treaty. In the end, due to hesitation, the opportunity was lost.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    A person can be passed down through the ages, and his story is still talked about today.

    It is mainly the credit of the historian.

    1.The story of the Assassin Qin is legendary through the ages. Although the assassination of Qin failed, whether it was Fan Yuzhi's self-sacrifice of his head, or his interaction with Prince Dan and the farewell of Yishui that has been sung through the ages, they all present such a story for future generations, emperors, heroes, royal families, sadness, friendship, pride, and heroic and uninhibited rangers.

    2.Jing Ke assassinated Qin Shi Huang. No matter how history portrays Qin Shi Huang, he always created the unification of Chinese culture, the unification of writing and weights and measures, and the implementation of the county system have left a valuable legacy for future generations.

    This is where the title of emperor begins. Qin Shi Huang left a strong mark in history, and Jing Ke, who tried to assassinate him, naturally has a place in the pen of historians.

    3.Qin Xing of the Han Dynasty, the meaning of the royal family. Don't say that historians are all about describing the real history.

    Even Tang Taizong has changed history, so as the emperor of the Han Dynasty, he naturally has to suppress the previous dynasty he replaced in the history books to prove that he conforms to the time and public opinion. Therefore, Sima Qian admired Jing Ke on the one hand, and on the other hand, he naturally wrote a lot about the deeds used to challenge the emperors of the previous generation. The history of the history has been passed down through the ages, and the praise of historians and writers has made people familiar with the heroes, heroes, and emperors in the historical records.

    Jing Ke's assassination of Qin is naturally even more famous.

    4.Adaptation and shaping of film and television works. Needless to say.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    It's just a coincidence, don't take it too seriously Assassination, especially the assassination of the royal family, especially the assassination of Yingzheng, there are so many people that it is impossible to describe, in this case, you can still evaluate the four major assassins of the same era, it is really not simple And Jing Ke is the most famous, and he can really only say that he is too lucky!

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Because we have had to memorize 300 Tang poems since we were children, including "The wind is sluggish and the water is cold, and the strong man will never return".

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    The wind is sluggish and the water is cold, and the strong man will never return!

    It was this rhetoric that made him a celebrity in the killer world.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    The first emperor in Chinese history he killed, of course, is famous.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    Upstairs was right, and the second thing was that he failed to assassinate. and his sentence, once the strong man is gone, he will not return.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    Tragedy is the easiest to get people's sympathy, isn't it, and it was the brutal Qin Shi Huang who assassinated Jing Ke.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    Be realistic, because we have learned the biography of Jing Ke written by Sima Qian.

    In fact, among the four major assassins of the Warring States, Jing Ke's own relatives did not die. I went purely to repay my kindness.

    And the general tragedy can be deeply rooted in the hearts of the people, so the failure is more distinct, and the sentence before Jing Ke's death, I want to capture you alive to repay the prince.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    Because the man he almost succeeded in assassinating was too famous (and not a good reputation).

    If successful, it will also have the greatest impact on Chinese history.

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    Because the person he assassinated was currently the most famous person assassinated by the Assassins.

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    Failed, but his spirit was great.

  20. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    Because the person Jing Ke assassinated was too good, the first person to unify China.

  21. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    It depends on who he wants to assassinate, and that's the First Emperor. Of course it became famous 0....

  22. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    Because "Warring States Policy" portrays this person very carefully.

  23. Anonymous users2024-01-20

    He gave up all his sons for the sake of the country.

  24. Anonymous users2024-01-19

    Because Qin Shi Huang is the most famous.

  25. Anonymous users2024-01-18

    He almost made it. Ha ha.

  26. Anonymous users2024-01-17

    Assassin: Refers to a good general like Jing Ke: refers to a general like Li Mu, in fact, it is a pronoun in the text, and does not really refer to a certain person, but generally refers to the assassins and excellent generals used by the Six Kingdoms. For details, you can see Su Xun's "Theory of the Six Kingdoms".

  27. Anonymous users2024-01-16

    Su Xun's "Treatise on the Six Kingdoms" said that Qi was only dependent on Qin, and may have given Qin money, but it was not a land cession. And what Su Xun wants to say is only the disadvantages of land cutting.

  28. Anonymous users2024-01-15

    The State of Qi was attached to the State of Qin and wanted to ally with him, but did not use some material things to the State of Qin.

  29. Anonymous users2024-01-14

    These two ** have their own opinions, analyzing the reasons for the fall of Qin and the fall of the Six Kingdoms from different angles, of course, there are various reasons for the demise of a dynasty or a country, and it is by no means composed of just one reason. Of course, the political reasons cited by the author account for a large part, but there are also a lot of economic and cultural factors in it. For example, in the cultural factor, each country of the Six Kingdoms has its own culture, which has been inherited for hundreds of years, and suddenly people are subordinated to the culture of the Qin Dynasty, and there are many things that people can't accept in their hearts.

    As for the destruction of the Six Kingdoms, it is even more varied, such as the fall of the Zhao State, Su Xun himself said, "It is a pity to use force but not to end".

    In addition, these two ** have the meaning of borrowing from the past and the present, so the author's selection of views has a lot to do with the current situation at the time, Jia Yi was demoted to Changsha, and felt that the emperor was unfair to himself or even unkind, so he said that the Qin Dynasty fell because of benevolence and righteousness, Su Xun was in the era of the Song-Liao war, and the Song Dynasty ceded land and paid compensation, so he said that the Six Kingdoms died because of bribing Qin.

    Hope it helps.

Related questions
14 answers2024-06-11

Jia Yi's theory of passing the Qin Dynasty pointed out that the reason for the decline and fall of the Qin State was not benevolent government, and only relied on force and cruel government to rule the people, which made the people live in hardship and unable to live, so they rose up and led to their demise. >>>More

5 answers2024-06-11

Su Xun was a famous essayist in the Northern Song Dynasty, he and his two sons, Su Shi and Su Zhe were both famous for their literature, and were collectively called the "Three Sus" by later generations. One day when Su Xun was 27 years old, he was flipping through books as usual, and inadvertently caressed Xie An's story about taking up people's time and studying hard. He read it carefully and felt that the story was very vivid, and after reading it again, he felt even more meaningful, so he read it several times, and every time he read it, he had a harvest. >>>More

2 answers2024-06-11

In the "Three Sus" of the Northern Song Dynasty, Su Xun and Su Shi are father and son. >>>More

9 answers2024-06-11

Su Xun: Ouyang Yongshu White Rabbit

Flying eagles fight the plains, and birds and beasts decay the grass. If you are boundless, you will be caught, and you can't protect it if you turn it upside down. The white rabbit can't bear to kill, sighing and loving his old age. >>>More

12 answers2024-06-11

Su Xun (1009-1066) was an essayist of the Northern Song Dynasty. The word is clear, Meishan (now Sichuan) in Meizhou. At the age of twenty-seven, he began to study hard, and repeatedly failed to enter the ranks. >>>More