Does a person have an obligation to have children? Is it a woman s duty to have children

I don't think it's a human obligation to have a baby, but a natural thing. Humans, like animals, need to reproduce。So I think the act of having a child is a very normal behavior for people.

If you don't have children, you won't be able to reproduce and pass on your ancestors. But everyone knows this, and many people know that having a baby is a necessary thing. But I don't think it is necessary to say that people have the obligation to have children, and some people may think that this is an obligation.

We have to admit how important it is for us to have children.

If you don't have children, you can't pass on the bloodline, that is, the bloodline relationship will end in your life. Anyway, we just know that having children is necessary. As a woman, this is one thing that cannot be escaped.

I think most women are happy to have children. I even feel that having a child is a happy thing. If a family does not have children, is it still considered a complete family?

When we have a child and then watch him grow up healthy and lively, we will surely also have a sense of accomplishment as successful parents.

There are also a small number of women who are infertile, and they also complain about the unfairness of fate. This shows how much they want a child. Having a child is more of a product of wanting to build a happy family.

So I think having children is very important for a family.

All in all, I think that having a child can actually be said to be an obligation, but more often than not, many people feel that having a child is a natural phenomenon or even behavior. I don't think there's any need to dwell on that.

As for the subject's question, I think so: reproduction is the basis for the survival and development of human beings, and it is also an important topic in life, but it is not an obligation.

It is undeniable that having children is a very important thing, whether in a husband and wife relationship, children serve as a bond and a bridge; Or in social relations, children are the future and hope of the motherland. If human beings do not reproduce and do not have children, then human beings can surviveReproduction and developmentWithout the foundation, it will be difficult for society to develop. In the long run, humanity will inevitably perish.

In my opinion, although it is important to have children, having children is not an obligation, but a shouldIt is a natural and natural choice in the development of the relationship between husband and wife。Couples choose to have children, not just for an obligation, but as a crystallization of love, as a continuation of life. In the family, children can act as a bond that brings couples closer together.

However, if a child is born for the sake of having a child, then, the arrival of the child is also unfortunate. If you are not ready to be a parent, it is better not to have children.

If people have the obligation to have children, then should we keep giving birth? In fact, the current society is no longer the society of raising children and preventing old age in the pastIt is the same to give birth to children and daughters, and you can't give birth to sons under the banner of reproduction. As long as you raise them well, daughters are as good as sons.

If you have too many children without education, you will not only fail to contribute to society, but will also increase the pressure on the population.

With the progress of society and the progress of human concepts, many people in big cities have married and had children later, and even many people have chosenDink。For them, having children is not an obligation, nor is it the ultimate goal of life, they have their own life that they want to pursue. Nor can we impose our own views on others.

Giving birth to a child"Like a person drinking water, he knows how cold and warm he is".

It is a woman's right, not obligation, to have children. Women have the right to choose to have children freely or not to have children if they are quietly prepared.

At its source, the rejection of ideas such as "having children is a woman's obligation" is a resistance to the conundrum of the long-term oppression of women's influence, and not only because having children is related to the obligation.

In the past, women relied on giving birth to boys to gain influence and rely on giving birth to children to provide services for the elderly, which created a feeling that "women can only complete their responsibilities when they have children". But now the laws and regulations.

Women have the freedom to conceive and not to conceive. With the development of the times, having a child should be more of a choice than an obligation, and the child is no longer a continuous incense candle to the world in order to put it bluntly, but just as a happy family, it is a gift from God to every home.

Personally, I think that rights and obligations are complementary. Giving birth to a child and giving birth to a new life is a great thing, and it is also a skill that women have more than men. Because men can't have children, women can, so the great thing of having children can only be done by women.

In fact, in a marriage, children are not only the continuation of our pure life, but also the crystallization of love, so in a marriage full of beauty, there will be children.

Legal analysis: The law does not stipulate that women are obliged to have children, but only that women give birth to children voluntarily and physically allowed.

Legal basis: Law of the People's Republic of China on the Protection of Women's Rights and Interests

Article 51: Women have the right to give birth to children in accordance with relevant state provisions, and also have the freedom not to have children. Husbands and wives of childbearing age shall follow the relevant provisions of the State in family planning, and the relevant departments shall provide safe and effective contraceptive devices and techniques to ensure the health and safety of women who undergo birth control surgery. The State implements a system of premarital health care and maternal health care, and develops maternal and infant health care.

People at all levels shall take measures to ensure that women enjoy family planning technical services and improve women's reproductive health.

Article 36: The state is to ensure that women enjoy personal rights equal to those of men.

Legal Analysis: Both husband and wife have the obligation to practice family planning. However, under family planning, whether or not to have children is a personal choice of citizens, not an obligation. The obligation to meet the national family planning requirements exists only after the intention is to have a child.

Legal basis: Article 49 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China Marriage notices, families, mothers and children are protected by the State. Husbands and wives imitate friends and both parties have the obligation to practice family planning.

Parents have the obligation to raise and educate their minor children, and adult children have the obligation to support and support their parents. It is forbidden to undermine the freedom of marriage and to abuse the elderly, women and children.

It is both a right and an obligation.

On the social stage, people cannot play roles as they like, and there must be a definite process for the assumption of roles, and the determination of roles is completed in long-term social interactions. Whether the determination of a role is effective or not is ultimately determined by society, but it is also inseparable from the activities and efforts of the individual. For women, her gender role is a pre-assigned role, while the mother role is a self-inflicted role.

Human beings are both cultural and natural creatures. For human beings, the mother is irreplaceable, because it not only fulfills its social responsibility, but also fulfills its biological function.

His wife argued that "having children is a woman's right, not a man's ground for divorce".

If it is a right, then it is clear that a man cannot use it as a ground for divorce, because civil rights can be waived, and the renunciation of rights certainly cannot be used as a ground for suing. If, as his wife claims, it is only a right, and that having children as a woman has the ultimate veto, it must be in a very disadvantageous position vis-à-vis a man - he cannot ask his wife to have children, and he is declared to have no legitimate children.

Therefore, I think that giving birth to children is an obligation of women, and the moment they agree to marry their husbands, to be exact, is the moment when the marriage certificate is registered and sealed, in fact, it is at this time that women give up their absolute reproductive rights to their bodies and agree to accept the obligation to reproduce the next generation for the family. Therefore, it can be seen from the above that third parties, lovers, etc. do not have the obligation to give birth to the next generation for you.

It is of course a woman's right to have children, but if you give up this right, it will also harm your husband's right to have children. But you can't give up your right to your body for the sake of your husband's right to procreate. People must first satisfy the right to free disposition of the body, and then talk about the right to procreation, which requires the cooperation of many people.

Therefore, in fact, it is of no practical significance to discuss whether it is a right or an obligation to have children, and two people must form a family together, and their outlook on life and worldview must be the same.

According to the Marriage Act, it is a woman's right and duty to have children.

It is difficult to give a simple answer as to whether marriage and childbearing are a necessary thing. Because this issue involves moral, cultural, religious, family, social and other aspects. Everyone's situation is different, some Divine Nuclei may very much want to get married and have children, while others don't care too much.

Here are some of the factors that can influence people's decisions:

First of all, the influence of family and culture is significant. In some countries in Asia, the Middle East and Africa, marriage and childbearing are seen as essential. In these cultural contexts, stress and expectations have an impact, leading many young people to believe that marriage and childbearing are a necessary task.

For some families, having children is also a way to continue the family bloodline, which increases the influence of the family.

Second, personal background and life experiences can also influence people's decisions. Some people are born into an environment where they are married and have children, and they take it for granted. On the contrary, going through some life experiences, such as the divorce of a relative, the singleness of a friend, etc., may make people feel that this way is okay.

Age is also a consideration, and after a certain age, you may feel that it doesn't matter if you don't want to get married and have children.

Third, social and economic factors can also have an important impact on people's decisions. With the progress of society, more and more attention has been paid to the professional and personal pursuits of individuals. Childbearing also has a very big impact on the work and career of an individual, especially for nomadic women.

Some people believe that if they get married and have children, they need to give up some opportunities for career advancement, which is a terrible path.

To sum up, marriage and childbearing is a very personal matter, because everyone's situation and background are different. However, no matter what environment and situation you are in, you need to respect your own decisions and choices, be free from the influence of society and others, and make the best decisions according to your own wishes and interests.