Please think of an example of a contradictory situation

In fact, to put it mildly, our education system is contradictory. Quality education is contradictory to the almost fateful college entrance examination.

Spear and shield The Chu people have a shield and a spear, and the reputation says: "My shield is strong, and things can't be trapped." He also praised his spear and said:

The benefits of my spear are all trapped in things. Or say: "With the spear of the son, the shield of the trap, what is it?"

Its people can also respond to it.

Translation: A man in the state of Chu who sold spears and shields praised his shield and said, "My shield is so strong that nothing can penetrate it."

He flaunted his spear and said, "My spear is so sharp that it can penetrate anything." "Someone asked:

How about poking your shield with your spear? "The man didn't come out.

Offense and defense on the football field are the relationship between spear and shield. Emphasizing the offensive, the more troops that must be put into the offensive, the defense will inevitably be weakened; On the contrary, if the emphasis on defense and the large number of troops that must be put into defense, the offensive will inevitably be weakened. Good offense and good defense are relative, that is, the spear and the shield are relative, and we cannot take extremes, otherwise, we will "contradict ourselves" and go to failure.

Life is full of contradictions, and the so-called contradictions are a dialectical relationship of opposition and unity.

For example, the relationship between Internet access and learning, the two are both opposite and unified, if you are too addicted to the Internet, learning will definitely not be good; But if you just "believe in the book" and immerse yourself in hard reading, then you will definitely miss the rich knowledge on the Internet; Therefore, grasping and resolving the contradiction lies in your subjective initiative, that is, the problem of "degree", which is the key to solving the problem.

On the fourth floor, the gentleman refers to an upright person.

It's not that there are no people who love and hate.

The most famous is the ancient Chinese story of "attacking the shield of the son with the spear of the son".

I think the sentence that a gentleman takes revenge, ten years is not too late, is very contradictory! Since you are a gentleman, how can you hate a person for ten years?

If he holds a grudge against a person for ten years, how can he be called a gentleman?

This is an example of the more extreme. FYI.

You said in the morning that you went to a friend's house last night, and in the afternoon you said that you went to accompany a client last night, aren't you contradicting yourself, what are you doing?

The idiom "contradictory" means to pierce one's own shield with one's own spear. Parables of their words and deeds contradicting each other.

Sentence formation: What he just said is contradictory, and others don't know how to understand it.

The Chu people have a seller of shields and spears, and they say: "The strength of my shield is that things can't be trapped." He also praised his spear and said: "The benefit of my spear is all in things." Or say: "With the spear of the son, the shield of the trap, what is it?" Its people can also respond to it.

I think Avanti said Great King, I can't trick you out of the palanquin, but I can trick you from the ground to the palanquin. "At this time, the king was already on the sedan chair, which means that the king was deceived by Avanti, so he had to get off the sedan chair, of course, so he just fell for Avanti!

I have a box of colored pencils, and I use it to draw a beautiful today: draw a red circle, which is the fiery sun. Draw a green square, it's a green grassland.

Draw a colorful semicircle, which is a beautiful rainbow after the rain. Draw an upright cuboid, that's our home.

I have a box of colored pencils, and I want to paint tomorrow's ideals with them: I paint colored skies in order to make the world beautiful. I draw children with wings so that we can fly together.

I painted bread falling from the sky in order to put an end to famine forever. I draw tall buildings in order to pick a beautiful star.

I have a box of colored pencils that I use to paint beautiful today:

Draw a blue circle, which is white clouds drifting across the blue sky.

Draw a yellow square, which is an endless rice field.

Draw a green semicircle, which is a forest on the horizon.

Draw a red triangle with fiery maple leaves floating in the mountains.

I have a box of colored pencils.

I use it to draw tomorrow's ideal:

I paint transparent starry skies in order to see the mysteries of the universe.

I draw the red moon to make the night brighter.

I paint a desert full of green trees, so that there is no more wind and sand.

I draw children who will fly spaceships in order to soar in the universe.

1. All students are good students. True.

None of my classmates were good students. False.

Some of the students are good students. True.

2. It contains the following syllogisms.

Premise: All those who want to take the postgraduate examination are studying foreign languages.

Small premise: I am not going to graduate school.

Conclusion: I'm not going to study a foreign language.

This syllogism is incorrect because it violates the rule that "what is not extended in the premise cannot be extended in the conclusion", and makes the logical error of "expanding the big term".

3. It is incorrect, violating the rule of "the middle term is extended at least once" in the syllogism, and the logical error of "the middle term is not extended".

4. It violates the "law of contradiction" in the law of logic, that is, it affirms two contradictory ideas at the same time. "Only if Xiao Li goes to Shanghai, Xiao Zhang will go to Nanjing" and "Xiao Li will not go to Shanghai" can be true at the same time, but they cannot be the same as "Xiao Zhang goes to Nanjing". If the first judgment is a necessary hypothetical judgment, and the second judgment negates the antecedent of the first judgment, and if both are true at the same time, the third judgment should be a negation of the posterior of the first hypothetical judgment, and the third judgment is an affirmation of the posterior of the first hypothetical judgment.

Therefore, if we cannot agree with the truth, and at the same time affirm the idea that we cannot agree with the truth, we have committed the logical error of "self-contradiction".

5. A valid syllogism, if the conclusion is a negative judgment, there must be a negative judgment in the two premises (according to the conclusion of the negative judgment, there must be a rule of negative judgment in the premise). If the premise is a negative judgment, it naturally cannot be an i judgment. If the minor premise is a negative judgment, the major premise must be a positive judgment (according to the rule that two negative judgments cannot lead to a conclusion), if the major premise is an i judgment, then the major item is not thoughtful in the premise, and the conclusion is a negative judgment, and the major item is circumferential in the conclusion, which violates the rule that "what is not considered in the premise must not be extended in the conclusion."

Therefore, the major premise cannot be i-judgment.

I studied logic last year, and I learned it well, but I did it at the time, but now I forget about it. Wait for the master.

The law clearly stipulates: Where laws and regulations provide otherwise, follow those provisions. Of course, it is not possible to calculate overtime pay according to special regulations when compensatory time off is not available. And Article 16 stipulates a minimum standard, which does not limit you from increasing the amount.

Where laws and regulations provide otherwise, follow those provisions.

If you work on a rest day, you will be paid the actual daily wages of the person who works on a rest day. The calculation base of overtime pay for other hours shall not be lower than the salary standard agreed in the labor contract.

Lingering lineage, long-term lineage, Song lineage, self-lineage, Gui lineage, family lineage, language family, hanging system, galaxy, non-lineage, reining lineage.

Phantom lineage, Yi lineage, sitting lineage, Detention lineage, Flooding lineage, Paternal lineage, Feng lineage, Upper lineage, Chi lineage, Aid lineage, This lineage, Attachment lineage, Large lineage, Phyletic.

Han system, river system, pan system, plagiarism system, scorpion system, private lineage, collar system, literary system, apprentice system, compilation system, posterior system, occupation system, transfer system, heel system.

Rank Department, Blood Department, Vain Department, School Department, Running Department, Sub-Department, Examination Department, Second Department, Infant Department, Holy Department, Supervision Department, Zhan Department, Poor Department, Impeachment Department, Levy Department.

By lineage, matrilineal, surname, light, managed, rong, xiang, shan, clan, yuan, ju, xian, official, migratory.

Relationship, Connection, Connection, Connection, Continuity, Inheritance, Inheritance, Affection, Prison, Faction, Connection, Capture, Machinery.

Straight lineage, lock lineage, collection lineage, restraint lineage, 縻 lineage, 匏 lineage, family lineage, technical lineage, grasp lineage, root system, water system, lodging system, ancestral lineage.

Bundle Department Department Discipline Department Parasitic Department Prohibition Department Litigation Department Resume Department Prison Department Noble Department Grievance Department Cable System Closed System Long Department.