The ultimate fate of the great extinction of the universe has not been confirmed

Updated on science 2024-06-16
7 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-12

    Since you are also awakened, you should understand that the fewer creatures who know about this problem and related information, the better.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    I believe that many people have pondered this question: does the universe have an end like human life? If the universe has an end, what does its end look like? Is it all over forever when it's dead?

    According to current physics, there are three possibilities for the ultimate outcome of the universe, one of which is slightly more optimistic than the other.

    Let's take a look first, why do we say that the universe will also end?

    The main basis for this speculation is that the universe is expanding at a certain rate, and that it is expanding faster and faster.

    And the reason for this expansion is the dark energy that we have not found until now.

    Albert Einstein also thought about dark energy, but he thought it was ridiculous. However, most astronomers and physicists now agree on the existence of dark energy and its impact on the expansion of the universe.

    But the problem is that no one has ever seen dark energy, and they don't know what its properties are, so physicists have made all kinds of brain supplements on it.

    Based on the nature of these brain formations, they deduced three possibilities for the death of the universe.

    The first way to die is called a big tear.

    Since the universe has been expanding since its inception, the Great Rift theory holds that there will be more and more space in the universe, and therefore more and more space between matter.

    At the moment, it seems that there is not enough space to be frighteningly large, so galaxies can still rely on gravity to maintain their existence.

    But at some point, the expansion of the universe will outweigh the effects of gravity, making it impossible for galaxies to come together again.

    That's when the universe begins to die.

    In the beginning, galaxies such as the Milky Way would be torn apart by space; Then, black holes, stars, and planets will disintegrate and die.

    Eventually, space expands faster than the speed of light, so much so that atoms begin to disintegrate. At this point, there are no more particles in the universe that can interact with each other.

    After the Great Tear occurred, there were only countless particles left in the universe that would never be seen again, hovering alone until "forever" (although time no longer exists).

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    Yes, the ultimate outcome of the universe is the big **, which will destroy everything in this universe, including galaxies and human beings.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    I think this is still for us to go**, because our knowledge is limited, whether it is silence or not we don't know.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    It is an inevitable end, and this is the result of the universe as long as it comes to an end.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Life exists to know the universe! In fact, human beings have not explored the entire universe, the scope of human exploration is the total galaxy, the total galaxy is not the universe, and the universe will not necessarily die out in the end, because this is the result of only considering the principle of entropy increase! The law of entropy does not agree, only the law of the future.

    Did the ancient believe that the earth was round? They thought that Fang's mistake would become right, and no one dared to object. What is later is left to the people who come after to look at the present.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    I don't know, although there is such a saying now, but the world changes every day, and as for what the end of the universe is, no one can say exactly.

Related questions
10 answers2024-06-16

The current radius of the universe is about 46.5 billion light-years, with a diameter of 93 billion light-years. However, 93 billion light-years is only the diameter of the universe that we can observe, and since the universe is expanding faster than the speed of light, we cannot know how big the universe really is if we only observe the universe from Earth, which is still an unsolved mystery.

7 answers2024-06-16

The universe is divided into large universes and small universes, the boundless ones are called the big universes, and the boundless ones are called the small universes, and the large universe is composed of a vast number of small universes. >>>More

15 answers2024-06-16

This is the problem of gravitation, there is a gravitational attraction between any two objects, and the reason why there is an atmosphere around the earth (the difference between vacuum and non-vacuum is whether there are gas molecules in a particular space) is because of the attraction of the earth to the atmosphere (the greater the mass of the object, the greater the gravitational pull). The mass of the Sun is greater, so it can attract the 9 planets around him, and the mass of the Earth is smaller, so it can attract the Moon around him. And stars (such as: >>>More

11 answers2024-06-16

A pair of twin fetuses, one is a farmer with only a Chinese degree, the other is a doctor with a graduate degree, two people with different destinies, the same birth conditions, at least in the objective conditions from birth to early childhood, but why is the result so different? Ma Zheshang said that man's destiny is the result of the combined action of one's own choices and objective reasons. This example is a very good proof of this sentence, I see that the problems you mentioned, it seems that the understanding of this sentence is not deep enough, not enough attention is paid to the influence of people's subjective selectivity on objectivity, it seems to pay more attention to the role of objective to subjectivity, people's destiny must be restricted by objective conditions, but the transformation of people's subjective selectivity on objective conditions cannot be ignored, so the transformation of people's own destiny can not be ignored. >>>More

8 answers2024-06-16

The concept is wrong, a black hole is a star, not a "hole", and there is now a considerable scientific theoretical explanation. The "white hole" is a hypothesis put forward when the "black hole" has just been discovered and has not been clearly studied, and the "wormhole" is also the hypothetical channel connecting the "white hole" and the "black hole" at that time. At present, the existence of "white holes" has not been scientifically confirmed, and there are still many scientific theories about "wormholes", which are theoretically channels connecting the past, present, future and other universes.