Which phone is good? E61 E61i N76

I've been paying attention to Nokia's mobile phone recently, but what I can tell you is that the N76 will lose paint, and the problem has not been solved yet, I am personally optimistic about the E65, although I also like the N76, you can go to the mobile phone ** network of the Pacific Network and Zhongguancun Network to see their evaluation of several mobile phones, which should help you.

I've just been using e71 for a week and it's great.

First of all, the system is very fast, and the configuration is not much of a disadvantage compared to 72. The speed of operation is satisfactory.

Secondly, the battery standby time is ridiculously long. I've only charged twice in a week until now!

Expandability is also acceptable, I installed an 8G card. It takes a while to get used to keyboard input, but typing is very fast after installing Sogou Pinyin!

The appearance of the real machine is also very outstanding, and the keys feel good, but the key spacing is small, and it is easy to make mistakes.

Overall, I think it should be the most cost-effective phone now.

If you buy parallel goods, there are Wi-Fi and 3G functions. So the difference with the E72 is even smaller.

Girls are very suitable.,There's a white one.,Pure white.,It's very bright to look at the real machine, I almost bought the white one, hehe, and the red one.,It's also very cute.。

As for the buttons, I think it's the coolest phone button I've ever used, it's just that the spacing is too close, so it should be fine.

I bought 1700 for water, which should be the lowest price. Okay, 2100, there can be no change before the year. After the year, it is enough to choke, I heard that the parallel goods may drop to 1500 after half a year, but I can't wait, so I will buy it to play first. But it feels like it's worth it.

I hope my experience has been useful to you.

1.Neither of them is good, I use garbage n75, n75 buy a bag and you regret it, n75 reacts slowly, love death, etc.

2.And the E61i

Advantages: The size is acceptable, and the full keyboard can be operated with one hand.

The call sound is okay, not very big, and it is the level of a general mobile phone.

The screen is clearly visible in strong sunlight, which I haven't encountered before with a PPC phone.

The fuselage is strong and fall-resistant, the back shell is rusty and the steel is very thick, so it will not easily fall out of the pit, and the rear upper cover is plastic, which can be sacrificed here if necessary.

The call is instantaneous, there is no PPC delay, the mobile phone is powerful, and the humanization is strong.

Symbian software is relatively small and easy to install and remove.

The automatic switching of packet data exchange is easy to use and saves power.

The standby and battery life are not comparable to PPC phones.

The responsiveness and determinism of the keyboard is what touchscreens can achieve.

The non-rich level of Symbian software is still quite good, better than originally thought.

Disadvantages: The screen is smaller, the resolution is too poor, and it is very inconvenient to see the web page.

Scalability and intelligence are much worse than PPC, after all, PPC is better than PDA.

The hardware configuration is slightly poor, such as the Bluetooth speed is not ideal, and the running memory is small.

There are many operations that are difficult to achieve on the non-touch screen, such as graffiti, handwritten notes, etc.; Web browsing is inconvenient, etc.

The same software as PPC basically has fewer features than PPC.

I suggest you buy 6120c, 5320xm, 5230, these three are only about 1000.