If you have been injured by a thief, please come forward, a thief is injured in burglary

I just lost my wallet yesterday, there are still some cards in my wallet, it's really infuriating, how do you want to hold your breath, you can sell your self-esteem and rely on your own strength to get food, but what about thieves? Betraying one's conscience, not necessarily eating, maybe going chic! I'm mad, they're going to send them and curse them!

If you see a thief in the future, you won't ignore it, and you will be punished severely!

My phone was stolen. I keep it in my pocket and hold it in my hand. But as soon as I entered, I pushed the door open and my hand came out. Wait until I'm done pushing the door and put it back in my pocket. The phone is gone.

I was overwhelmed by the speed at which it was so fast. Sweat.

When I was eight years old, I was painting sand in the park during the Spring Festival, and the thief reached behind my back and took a 50 yuan red envelope and 7 yuan change from my small bag.

I've met twice, I dropped two mobile phones, and I lost two in just one year in the middle, and I was angry. It's only taken less than half a year, and I'm depressed.

Will thieves be punished?

I hated it to the core, and when I got in the car, it was stolen.

The hateful thing is that later the thief called me ** and blackmailed me with my ID card ......

I bought a new ADI bag, the bag has a wallet and a mobile phone, the hateful thief made 3 cuts in my bag, and I have been crying for a month!

My phone was stolen the day before yesterday! Depressed! Curse him!

I feel the same way, hehe, I topped it.

o(∩_o...Ha ha.

Don't say anything.

Ape droppings. One of the two will meet.

My bag is scratched, thief. Damn it.

The thief entered the house and was injured by stealing something, which should be regarded as an act of self-defense, because the thief stole first, and the act of fighting back is also reasonable.

It should be an act of self-defense, because it was he who went first to steal something, and if he didn't steal, he wouldn't have beaten him, this is an act of self-defense, and hitting him should also be, and if you don't hit him, he will steal from you.

Yes, because it was the thief who was at fault in the first place, and you injured him while protecting your property and personal safety, it is an act of self-defense and does not constitute a crime.

It should be considered a reasonable act of self-defense for you to do so, because after all, it is a thief who enters the house and steals something, causing you a certain amount of fright, and you are also to blame for being injured, and you can use legal means to protect your rights and interests.

If the thief doesn't attack you, you shouldn't be acting in self-defense, but if the thief is attacking you, it's definitely self-defense, and the nature of the thief's burglary has changed.

If the thief is stealing and hitting the thief is excessive defense, but if the thief hits him after stealing something, it is the crime of intentional injury.

No, there are some crimes of intentional harm to others, after all, he steals things, does not cause harm to you, and at the same time does not threaten your personal safety.

It can be regarded as self-defense, because when a thief steals something, he will definitely act more excitedly, and it is also to protect himself, so he will mark it.

Of course, this is the right thing to do, and in order to protect yourself from property damage in time, you should not be afraid, the law will not punish you.

Of course it can be counted, because it is the thief who enters your home first, and everything you do can be counted as self-defense.

Yes, because such an act of a thief is illegal in the first place, and he should defend himself after being hurt.

Count, it's because you accidentally injured the other person when you were fighting with them, but you didn't put their lives in danger.

I was doing this as a sign of self-defense, and this self-defense was good, and I reacted well to protect my property.

Of course, forget it, because after all, it is a thief who enters your house to steal something, so it is completely self-defense to say that you injured him.

Forget it, after all, if a thief enters your home, you should take certain measures to protect your own safety.

Forget it, of course. Your actions are justified and you do not need to bear any legal responsibility at all.

Counted. So you don't have to worry about being held accountable. Because your actions are justified in self-defense.

I think it's okay because he's already a burglary, and it's a bad behavior, and he should be stopped.

Of course, forget it, and this kind of behavior is also legitimate defense, otherwise his fate may be worse than his.

It is considered an act of self-defense. Because you are doing this to protect your property, and also to protect yourself.

It should be counted, because in this process, the other party has already posed a certain threat to himself, so it should be compliant.

This is considered legitimate defense, and he will not bear the corresponding responsibility, and he will also be given a certain reward.

If, as you said, it was the thief who provoked and beat your dad first, and your dad wanted to get the phone back, you can tell him on the grounds of self-defense. "Article 20 of China's Criminal Law stipulates that an act taken to stop an unlawful infringement in order to protect the state, the public interest, the person, property and other rights of oneself or others from an ongoing unlawful infringement and causes damage to the unlawful infringer shall be regarded as legitimate defense and shall not bear criminal responsibility.

Where legitimate defense clearly exceeds the necessary limit and causes major harm, criminal responsibility shall be borne, but punishment shall be commuted or waived. "Encyclopedia: You can take a look at this entry.

Fu doesn't fit your dad's situation. Actually, I don't think your dad has to pay any responsibility, but if you go to the Public Security Bureau, you might be able to make a symbolic match, I guess, you can defend yourself on this ground.

Your dad can consider this from the perspective of legitimate defense, at most it can be considered excessive defense.

There should be compensation, and there is responsibility.

Your question is very interesting, of course, it is also a legal issue, I guess you want to find out what circumstances the owner is legally responsible, right? In the opinion of this lawyer, in the fourth case, the owner cannot completely get rid of the responsibility, and the specific situation at the time of each situation can be determined.

It is recommended to hire a local lawyer, it is more beneficial for you not to pursue criminal liability!

According to what you said, you do not have the subjective consciousness of intentional injury, the purpose is only for legitimate defense, as for whether the attack is too heavy, this is not determined by the injury of the other party, but depends on what kind of psychological state you were in at that time, whether it is related to the words and deeds of the person who stole into the house, in order to determine whether the defense is excessive.

According to you, if it is true, then because the state of mind you were in at that time was the most critical, coupled with the lack of light, the thief's behavior made you feel more "if he can still resist, you will have a threat of death", because you may think that he would be carrying a deadly ** (such as a sharp knife or even a pistol, etc.), so as long as he can move, it will make you feel scared, even if you shoot heavily, but in this case, I myself tend to " belong to legitimate defense" and do not need to be investigated for criminal responsibility!

Therefore, it is recommended to find a criminal lawyer to help follow up.