Very confused, about the postgraduate entrance examination, well wishers

Don't worry, there are a lot of three-span students in the postgraduate entrance examination now, I am a three-span student, if you are not satisfied with your current situation, you can change your major if you want to. Don't ask us, we are not satisfied with the college entrance examination once, and the postgraduate entrance examination is to make your dreams come true, not casually.

It is indeed an advantage to have good English for the postgraduate entrance examination, but the question type for the postgraduate entrance examination is different from that of the fourth and sixth levels, there is no listening, only reading, translation and writing.

Undergraduate computer science, that is, you have studied mathematics, it is very convenient to learn mathematics, and you should review it well for graduate school mathematics.

Politics go to sign up for a training class, the effect is good, save time, don't read books by yourself, the effect is really poor.

The next is the problem of professional courses, now in the third year, that is, in January 2011, there is enough time to study any professional course, as long as you really want to learn. Professional courses are very important, for three-span students, the problem you face is actually that if you have tried the first time for the postgraduate examination, will you be discriminated against by the profession during the re-examination, frankly speaking, there is indeed this problem, but the postgraduate examination is divided into written tests and interviews, if you are well prepared and have enough professional knowledge, I believe that you can pass, after all, the score is the most intuitive thing.

Finally, I hope you will have confidence and welcome you to embark on the road of graduate school entrance examination.

If you decide to go to graduate school, you have to study hard, and the cross-major and cross-school entrance examination is the most difficult. Are you interested in the economy? If you can study accounting, it is relatively easy for girls to find some jobs.

If you are good at speaking English, you may want to consider transferring to a language major.

But if you go to graduate school? It's hard to say. I was also very confused. The computer major is also not very good. If your parents are good at arranging work. Support employment, now the situation is getting worse and worse, it is better to get a job.

Those who are very professional will definitely not work. You think you can learn accounting well in a short time、??

It's still too late. It seems that the architectural history of Chinese workers can be considered. It is difficult to change majors.

It is recommended to take an economics test! If you're not too bad at math, it's recommended to take the finance test or something! It's been popular lately, and it's good for girls!

Architecture is a relatively professional major, if you don't have a bachelor's background, it is not recommended to take the exam! If you have good English, it is very advantageous for the graduate school entrance examination! But don't take it lightly, because it is recognized that the English entrance examination is more difficult than level 6!

It's okay to learn more about the process of the graduate school entrance examination! If you are going to take the architecture exam, it is recommended to meet more friends who study architecture, I think their advice will help you make a decision! Recommend you to 42719081 a group of Wuhan University School of Urban Design Entrance Examination Group, there are many architecture students, of course, this is not to recommend you to take the Wuhan University, just hope that you can meet some people who take the architecture exam through this, they will give you some advice!

Confident, overconfident. Some students are confident when they retake the exam. That's a good thing, but remember one thing. If you talk too much, you will lose. Some students mumble to themselves during the re-examination and do not give the teacher a chance to speak at all. It seems that I am not interviewing the teacher, but the teacher.

I hope you can understand a little bit. The disadvantage of you is that you have no real scientific experience. Although you are well prepared, you are familiar with what you memorize, but what you said was seen in other books.

After all, it's on paper. Once the teacher finds a loophole and asks you detailed questions, its lethality will directly leave you speechless. Self-deprecation.

Overconfidence is not a good thing, but blind self-deprecation is also a taboo in graduate school entrance examinations. Common examples are "I'm incompetent", "I know I'm not doing well, but I'll try hard in the future", "We are poor in undergrad, but universities are mixed up, but we graduate students will study hard". There is no way for this guru to believe you.

You'll be mixed up for four years in college.

Who can guarantee that your graduate students will not continue to mix in for three years. (William Shakespeare, Hamlet, Faith) is a good thing, but to belittle oneself and admit one's shortcomings in the retest is to "make a head". Self-deprecation often means low self-esteem.

Students who speak quietly, behave unnaturally, are overly nervous, and cannot see the teacher's eyes when they look down during the retest. Overconfidence is not a good thing, but blind self-deprecation is also a taboo in graduate school entrance examinations. Common examples are "I'm incompetent", "I know I'm not doing well, but I'll try hard in the future", "We are poor in undergrad, but universities are mixed up, but we graduate students will study hard".

There is no way for this guru to believe you. You'll be mixed up for four years in college. The disadvantage of you is that you have no real scientific experience.

Although you are well prepared, you are familiar with what you memorize, but what you said was seen in other books. After all, it's on paper. Once the teacher finds a loophole and asks you detailed questions, its lethality will directly leave you speechless.

The disadvantage of you is that you have no real scientific experience. Although you are well prepared, you are familiar with what you memorize, but what you said was seen in other books. After all, it's on paper.

Once the teacher finds a loophole and asks you detailed questions, its lethality will directly leave you speechless.

I think that students who fail the re-examination generally come from two aspects: their own language expression and the establishment of values, because the interviewer mainly looks at language expression and conversation and communication skills during the interview.

Lack of confidence during the interview. I can't do a good job, and I will be nervous when I perform, and I can't play better when I face problems.