Climbing the high voltage line and committing suicide caused the death of the elderly, why did the s

Because suicide is inherently difficult and terrifying.

If you jump off a building, there will be a police officer to save you immediately, drinking pesticides is too painful, and sleeping pills are still regulated, so it is not surprising to come up with such a way.

The death rate of electric shock is high, because the power of the high-voltage line is very large, and if a person touches the high-voltage line, he will be electrocuted to death instantly, so he will climb the high-voltage line.

He wanted to experience what it was like to be electrocuted, and wanted to know how this way of dying would be, so he climbed up.

A man in Changzhou, Jiangsu Province climbed a high-voltage power pole to commit suicide and "walked a tightrope" for 8 hours. Due to the dangerous situation, the local power supply department pulled the gate to rescue, and finally the man who committed suicide was rescued. However, due to the power outage, an elderly man who was on a ventilator died tragically. Is he an indirect murderer?

Some netizens think,This is indirect homicide, although he did not kill him, but he caused the old man to die because of him, this is why I don't kill Beren, Beren died because of me. For this matter, I don't know whether the man should bear the corresponding responsibility or the power supply company, if so, the three parties can sit down and talk and negotiate.

Some netizens also think,This is not indirect homicide。Indirect homicide refers to the crime of indirect intentional homicide. Obviously, this person did not have the intention of killing, and he didn't even know that the old man's death was related to him, and I believe that the power supply department would not know about it, so whether it was a man or the power supply department, this could not be counted as indirect homicide.

There are also netizens who think,This happened purely by chance, and since it existed by chance, it is an exception。For such a thing, what we can do is to treat everyone with kindness, so that everyone can feel love, even though the old man has passed away, we can negotiate with the man and the power supply company about the compensation, and even negotiate with the hospital, after all, this is the death in the hospital.

No matter how negotiated,I hope it can be in the spirit of humanitarianismThis is a kind of care for men and a care for the families of the elderly。In this way, the matter can be solved perfectly, which is a good thing, otherwise, if such a thing occurs, the family of the elderly will make trouble, which will lead to some bad changes in the incident.

For this matter, the parties did not respond, the lawyer believes that this can be held accountable, but the civil liability should limit the degree of fault of the man, I don't know what the family of the old man thinks, everyone thinks that the man who climbed the high-voltage line committed suicide and caused the death of the old man, is he an indirect homicide?

Not counted. The man did not know that his actions would lead to the death of the old man, and he had intended to commit suicide.

At last. Committing suicide but killing others, and causing the death of others without wanting to live, this is unintentional homicide and homicide.

It should be counted, after all, the old man suffered a catastrophe because of him.

There is a 27-year-old young man in Jiangsu Province, who is about to turn 30 years old, and he is already a middle-aged person. But he was still as naïve as a child, and did a lot of things, which led to some irreparable consequences. I also thought that there were some conflicts with my girlfriend, which led to their breakup,Then he wanted to commit suicide because he couldn't think about it, and then he climbed up a high-voltage power pole.

He climbed up and shuttled back and forth between the high-voltage power lines, and still squatted on them and smokedWhat a significant thing this is, there are a lot of people who have stopped ** This incident has also caused serious traffic jams in the local area. In desperation, the rescuers had to turn to the local electricity bureau to pull down the electric switch, so as not to cause more harm to the surrounding people because he smoked on it.

But after 8 hours of grinding, he spent a lot of time on itHe didn't stop for a long time, and he didn't make any moves, and then he finally couldn't hold on anymore, and still took the initiative to ask the rescuers for help, and needed them to help him save him. But in the 8-hour grind, people did not have 8 hours of electricity, which had a serious impact on their lives.

The most serious thing is that there is an old man nearby during these 8 hoursHis life has reached the point where he needs a ventilator to maintain, and the power outage for such a long time led to the fact that the old man did not use the ventilator and was about to die, and then sent to the hospital for rescue, and after many times of rescue ineffective, the old man finally died.

This matter is also very serious, so the relevant local court arrested him for the crime of picking quarrels and provoking troubles in accordance with the law. His behavior has brought irreparable consequences to the old man's family and the old man, and if he doesn't do this, the old man can obviously live. He also indirectly took the life of this old man, so he will also pay some corresponding price.

Take your own responsibility. Obviously, the responsibility lies with the elderly, and it is clearly stipulated that they cannot climb the high-voltage line, and the old man himself does not listen, so he can only bear the consequences.

The death of the old man who climbed the high-voltage line is the responsibility of the power company. But in fact, the responsibility of the power company is not very large, and the main responsibility is because of the old man, who climbed the high-voltage line without authorization to cause death.

Personally, I think that if you insist on who is responsible, it should be the children, guardians, and the elderly themselves who are responsible, and as the guardians of the elderly, the children have the greatest responsibility.

This is the shared responsibility of the rescuers and the people who climb the high-voltage line, and they should compensate the families of the elderly for their losses together.

In my opinion, the man's subjective fault for the death of the ventilator was de-energized, which is negligent negligence.

Article 233 of the Criminal Law [Crime of Causing Death by Negligence] Whoever causes death by negligence shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than seven years; where the circumstances are more minor, a sentence of up to three years imprisonment is to be given. Where this Law provides otherwise, follow those provisions.